Sign of black blood or not?

[Lang]

Its a common fact that people with coloration on the joint of the finger, elbows and knees have black ancestry. Now, have you noticed that some white people have a tiny coloration spot on the tip of the finger, right below the fingernails?

Most people have it red/pink, and others have it normal colored. A few white people have it a lil bit darker than the regular skin though, almost like an inflamation at the base of the nail. In some its very small, in some its a bit bigger, but never reaching the first joint of the finger. But its such an insignificant thing, that I'm not sure its an evidence of black blood by itself.

What do you people think?

I'll annex two pictures as examples. I circled the area I'm talking about.

[Kentucky]

Its a common fact...

Please provide some common scientific proof.

Mark

[Lang]

Its a common fact...

Please provide some common scientific proof.

Mark

I don't specifically have scientifical evidence on that. There may be some, but none that I'm aware of. I said that based on practical experience with black and mixed people, and also based on common knowledge between another racialists and some National-Socialists with practical experience with mixed-race people. So, this is common knowledge. I'm sure someone here who have seen lots of mixed-race people can confirm what I'm saying. I'm sure a racial anthropology website would confirm it as well. Unless some white person have these traits due to some medical condition. But these parts of the body naturally colored are a trait not uncommon to find among bastards.

[Kentucky]

Well, I've never heard of it before. A couple of years ago somebody was saying that if you don't have blue eyes, you're not White and had absolutely no scientific evidence to back up his claims. By posting a picture of lily white hands with only a gradient of tone, everybody is going to be looking at their fingers based on your unscientific assumptions. By the way, what is the source of the picture?; where did you get it?; was it related to your premise? Let's not cast aspersions and stick with known scientific traits of hybrids. Otherwise you're creating an unnecessary canard when there's bigger fish to fry. Or if you can provide proof, we don't have to spend our time spinning our wheels in the mud (pun intended) with a whirlwind of opinions.

Mark

[Lang]

If you look at black people's joints, its always darker than their regular skin, and if you look at nordic people's joints, its always in the same color, or reddish. But as I said, I have no knowledge of a scientific book speaking of it, its just characteristics racialist folks observed in practice. The pics are random pics to examplify. About the coloration at the base of the fingernails, I didnt say its sign of blackness, I asked it, as I'm not sure. Ive spoken to Bill earlier about this issue, he advised me to create a thread and see what people know about it. Lets wait and see if someone here has something to add.

The question about the coloration there is not a wild guessing of mine, by the way, its something Ive noticed some racialist people speaking of, and Im 100% positive one person in this forum spoke of it (can't remember now, it was in the last year I think).

[Fenwick]

It's funny you should say that actually, I'd thought the same myself. Obviously there is some variance but I would say you can see in mixed people whose skin is mostly white, they often have brownish skin around their finger joints and on the cuticle and on the backs of their hands, leaving a noticeable colour difference between the back and their palms.

Like this but a bit lighter:




But again, I must stress that this is my observation in a country with limited sunlight where a person's skin is usually its natural colour and even minor differences are very noticeable. I wouldn't want you to start rejecting people based on the limited evidence of cuticle discolouration. There are quite a few small factors that people claim can determine nonwhite ancestry, but the fact is they're never 100% foolproof and there will always be some who are diluted so much you can't see it.


And as a rule I wouldn't worry about reddish skin anywhere. It's when the discolouration is brown that you want to worry.

[Lang]

But again, I must stress that this is my observation in a country with limited sunlight where a person's skin is usually its natural colour and even minor differences are very noticeable. I wouldn't want you to start rejecting people based on the limited evidence of cuticle discolouration. There are quite a few small factors that people claim can determine nonwhite ancestry,

As I said, these black hands have darker spots in the joints of the finger, and if you pay attention, a tiny coloration at the base of the fingernails. I haven't seen a white person with brown joints yet, but I've seen some with light-brown coloration near the nails, as I said. Do you think there are other factors involved that can make it look like this?

but the fact is they're never 100% foolproof and there will always be some who are diluted so much you can't see it.

Exactly, I'm not ready to judge based on such a tiny thing, that is why I asked here.

[Staropramen]

Many years ago I had a _________ [I forget exactly] deficiency that caused my knuckles and finger joints to harden and become spikey. If I accidentally grazed you or myself it would draw blood. Good thing that got cured. These days I'd be arrested for carrying a weapon Lol!