Gaius wrote:It starting to seem like that to me, too, Staropramen.
This individual's whole demeanor spoke of "winning an argument" and "lording it over" rather than a discussion among Bible-believers to see if these things are so, as the Bereans did.
This fellow from my wife's church that I met had the same attitude. It was all about winning the argument so as to lord something over me. He even had a "bible study" which attempted to elucidate how scripture forbids honest discussion amongst Christians. Every single scripture employed was misappropriated, taken out of context or flat out twisted to say something entirely different. In response to my quoting the Berean passage he proclaimed that the Bereans never debated the meaning of scripture with Paul and therefore that passage doesn't refute his "no debate" doctrine but rather supports it. My explanation that the Bereans lack of need to confront Paul about his teachings only proves that Paul's doctrines were sound fell on deaf ears. He apparently was incapable of understanding that Paul could teach something about teachers without being himself guilty of the offences that he was teaching about. But yet this clown is teaching people scripture! Unbelievable!
