THE FOUR WORDS: ATHEISM CANNOT DEFEND RACE

[Filidh]

The Northwest Front itself is something that I've already given my word to, and my word is good so I'm sticking with it. But Covington is someone who I don't agree with. Therefore I'll work under and with the NF in recognition of the fact that Covington isn't the NF and the NF isn't Covington.
[clarified this post below]

[Kentucky]

The Northwest Front itself is something that I've already given my word to, and my word is good so I'm sticking with it. But Covington is someone who I don't agree with. Therefore I'll work under and with the NF in recognition of the fact that Covington isn't the NF and the NF isn't Covington.

But you said, "Diversity is weakness, whether racially or faithfully. Many faiths fighting side by side will fall in turn, because diversity is divisive." Covington is a part of NF, which makes it diverse. Regardless of how people within the NF feel about it, the public perception is that it's Weird Harold's baby! Ask anybody outside your organization: whose name comes to mind when they hear Northwest Front?


Mark

[Vandal]

The answer to Harold Covington's fantasy is found in Exodus 18, 1 Chronicles 27:1, 1 Samuel 22:7, and of course, Chronicles 29:6. We are called to build the temple alluded to there. It is a temple made without hands, not polluted by any tool, a house of "living stones."

"If ye have faith even as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, 'be cast into the sea,' and it shall be so." The mountain is a power, empire, etc. "Ye" is plural, not the singular thou.

The thousand years that Christ ruled with his princes was the Danelaw / Common law era when much of Europe was organized as hundreds, with captains over the hundreds (see bible references above). Although there were monarchs, they were not dictators during much of this time, rather martial rulers to secure the state while the people governed themselves.

Covington's idea of just drafting up a constitution that is not based on a former law, is doomed to failure. A constitution is a religious document, just ask the Romans. Con + stituare, "bind together." Do you want to be bound together under a central state that makes no reference to our ancestral law and inheritance? Also, the idea of organizing a violent revolution when mere speech would accomplish the separation, is madness. The zeitgeist of our time will only tolerate isolated official violence; it will not allow massive violence, and your own brethren would suppress you. But they cannot suppress the preaching of the good news. They can only persecute the messengers, which will strengthen the message. Violence is not the answer. A grounding in the law of our fathers is.

Z.O.G. is not stopping groups of ten or fifty or one-hundred white families from meeting together to break bread and form their own constitution. Yet nobody in the pro-white "movement" has done so to date. Imagine even just ten families pooling resources, running a business or two. Imagine 100 families in one accord, and the collective bargaining power they would have in society. Now imagine a network of ten hundreds, the resource allocation they could achieve, the collective bargaining they could wield, the clout they could have in their local communities. Yet nobody will do this. Instead, they err in thinking they can appoint one leader and use violence to change the whole world instead of focusing on realistic changes of their own families and communities.

But alas, in "da mooment" people can't agree on anything because they really don't want to work that hard. People like Covington know this, and are either wasting their time on the wrong audience, or making lists of names.

Jurisdiction is about your right to speak. Since people do not assemble together in one accord, they have no jurisdiction to address the clowns who pretend to rule over us, and the clowns know it.

[Filidh]

I'm still able to agree with the concept of the Northwest Territorial Imperative and reject Harold and the standard NF model. It existed before him and will exist after him. I'm able to go about Northwest activism while rejecting Harold's idea, not associating with him and the people who are about him, and still maintaining the idea of a Northwest homeland.

To put it blatantly: I dislike Harold strongly and disagree with him on a huge number of things, and I've grown a flat-out distrust for him.

But I've already given my word that I would work towards the Northwest Territorial Imperative and I'm unable to go back on my word as such.

I see the Northwest Homeland idea as something that isn't violent. I'm not going to prepare for violence or advocate it at all. I don't agree with the NF constitution and program. The NF just popped up a few years ago and the concept of a Northwest Homeland can grow without having anything to do with the NF as it is, but still draw in members from the NF who have been duped into believing in Covington.

The Northwest is a great place to begin planting the seeds for Israelite identity. Not for everyone necessarily, but for me. I've made a commitment to this part of the land and I'm sticking to it. To go back on it would be to nullify my word, if it still means anything.

I agree with the Northwest Homeland. I reject the NF as it is.

I should've more properly stated that before rather than using the term 'NF'. In the future I'll more carefully review my words before posting.

But again, so there can be no confusion on the matter: Nevermind Covington! He very well may be a fed, but either way I'm not touching him with a ten-mile pole. I'll organize the concept of a Northwest Homeland in the coming years as best as I'm able to without the NF as it is and without the paganistic trash that permeates it.

Vandal and Mark : I agree with you. Earlier when I said "the nf isn't harold and harold isn't the nf" I should've said "the northwest homeland isn't the nf/harold and nf/harold isn't the northwest homeland".

[Gallowglass]

Northwest front? I heard many times that area is full of liberals,even more than in other states. To me sounds like a bad idea.

NF area in short:

[Kentucky]

Northwest front? I heard many times that area is full of liberals,even more than in other states. To me sounds like a bad idea.

NF area in short:

I was born and raised in Washington state and can testify that there is an extreme polarity between left and right with the leftists slightly having the edge. It is most pronounced, comparatively speaking, between the big cities and the rural country folks and between western and eastern Washington separated by the Cascade mountains, where there is a strong secessionist movement to form a new state. There are several counties or areas that want to form their own counties from King county, which is Seattle. Seattle is infested with communists; in fact, the Univ. of WA in its main plaza is called Red Square. The cultural divide is quite defined and both sides are engaged in a cultural war. If people move to the Northwest, they should have a firm grip on the demographics and know where to move and where not to move.

Mark

[Vandal]

"The common enemy of the white race is all antichrists, including Harold Covington. There is no compromise or
cooperation with atheists and nonbelievers."

[ source: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UnitedAry ... 3?o=1&d=-1 ]

What most in the "white movement" have not learned is simple, and I will say it, and I know I would probably be hated for stating it. This is not only a racial conflict. This is a war of darkness versus light, or a war of a dark race against our Father and God, with us in the middle, being pulled in whichever direction we want to go. All, regardless of race, who stand against the word of our Father, are anti-christ. "Christ" is "the tree of life" and he, in person, personified himself as the ultimate symbol of our race, i.e., our race are branches in the tree of life. To be anti-Christ is to be against the root of our tree, and all that it implies. Harold, and some of his comrades, have made public declarations of their rejection of Christ. To be seen as associated with him and his "front" can only have negative consequences. His violent rhetoric is unneccessary. We do not need violence; we need truth, and whatever violence the truth does to the minds of liars is enough to make their fruit manifest in due season. Harold Covington cannot see the truth, and that is all I need to know about him.

We will have an all-white homeland. We already do. The non-whites here will all either kill each other or go away when we're no longer able to feed them off our industry and economy. We should go about our business and work CONSTRUCTIVELY, not violently, not revolutionary, until Christ comes. There is nothing wrong with building organizations and groups, but if they don't conform to common sense and Yahweh's word, they will either fail or bring harm to people. If we are too focused on the evil plans of the anti-christs, it can incapacitate us. Let the things of tomorrow take care of themselves, for the evil of the day is enough.

If you want a true Northwest Front, to build a true proto-nation, you have to follow scripture. You must organize people by one Lord, one Faith, and one Baptism. You can't do that unless Yahweh motivates it. You must have totally autonomous assemblies who come together to solve problems when needful. You must all agree on one unalterable Law, and enforce it in your own houses, or it will fail. This is not something you can do on the internet. This is not something you have a huge podcast or rallies for. This is not something that is open to public view. It is something that leaders of families simply are able to do, but won't do, because there's football, bingo, casinos, TV, nascar, etc. I seriously doubt it will happen until Yashua returns to clean house. But if someone has the juice to get ten thousand families organized under the identity message let me know, and I'll revise my opinion.