by wmfinck » Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:30 pm
From the Christogenea New Testament:
"XVII 1 And after six days Yahshua takes Petros and Iakobos and Iohannes his brother and brings them up onto a high mountain by themselves. 2 And He was transformed before them, and His face shined like the sun, and His garments became white like light. 3 And behold! Moses appeared to them, and Elijah, speaking together with Him. 4 Then responding Petros said to Yahshua: 'Prince, it is good for us to be here! If You desire, I shall make here three tents, one for You and one for Moses and one for Elijah!' 5 Yet upon His speaking, behold! A bright cloud overshadowed them, and behold! A voice from the cloud saying 'This is My beloved Son, in whom I am pleased. You hear Him!' 6 And hearing it the students had fallen upon their faces and feared exceedingly. 7 And Yahshua came forth and taking hold of them said 'Arise and do not fear!' 8 Then raising their eyes they saw no one except Yahshua Himself only.
"9 And upon their descending from the mountain Yahshua commanded them saying 'Tell no one of this sight until when the Son of Man has been raised from the dead!'"
The word is "sight", not "vision" which in modern times, as you infer, implies something not real. The Greek word is ὅραμα hopama, and it means "that which is seen, a sight, spectacle", which is how Liddell & Scott have the word defined. The Greeks had another word which they used to describe the sort of "vision" which you suppose this to be, and that is φάντασμά, phantasma, which actually does appear in the context of an unreal vision at Matthew 14:26 and Mark 6:49. But the apostles did not see a φάντασμά, they saw an ὅραμα, a sight, not a vision, on the mount with Christ. Peter did not want to put up tents for apparitions, and Christ was not talking to apparitions. So your reasoning fails miserably.
John 8:56 (CNT):"Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see My day, and he has seen and is delighted." Where does this say anything about forethought? And if Abraham saw it in forethought, why would he need to "rejoiced that he would see", if he had already seen? Why do you add words to Scripture, and then make your own doctrine? Again I suggest to you, to go read the paper I wrote last week on Biblical exegesis, because your methods are entirely wanting.
Matthew 22:32, (CNT): "'I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaak and the God of Jakob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living!'" Abraham and Isaak and Jakob are living indeed. So are the rest of our race, which is why at 1 Peter 2:18-20 we read (CNT):"18 Because Christ also suffered once for all errors, the just on behalf of the unjust, in order that He may lead you to Yahweh, indeed dying in the flesh
but being made to live by the Spirit. 19 At which also going He proclaimed to those spirits in prison, 20 who at one time had been disobedient – when the forbearance of Yahweh awaited in the days of Noah’s preparing the vessel in which a few, that is eight souls, had been preserved through the water." Those "spirits in prison" were the dead who passed even before the flood!
Saul spoke to Samuel after Samuel had died. Paul talks about the existence of the consciousness independent from the body. There are many other places I can go with this. You deny the spiritual world. If you deny the spiritual world, that would make you a modern-day Sadducee!

If a jew is moving his lips, he's lying. If you see a rabbi, there has already been a crime!