Jews are NOT Judeans!
I know this matter has been well explained at Christogenea and elsewhere in CI. However, I thought I would add it here just in case non-CI folk are reading through this thread.
The question of whether those claiming to be Judeans today are genetic descendents of the Judeans of the Scriptures has been addressed at length on the Christognea site, and within Christian Identity. Overwhelming evidence shows that those claiming to be racial Judeans today are in no way racial Judeans. However, Judeo-Christians claim that they are. Indeed, this is the basis for the very term “Judeo-Christian”, as the term describes the Jew / Gentile dogma.
In no way at all are those claiming to be Judeans actually racial Judeans. Judeo-Christians preach of a dichotomy of “Jews and Gentiles”, whereas the correct interpretation of Scripture is Judeans and Nations, that is, Judeans and Adamic Nations (racial Judeans being also an Adamic nation).
A critical starting point is the fact that the Sciptures are express in the position that to be an acceptable descendant of Adam before Yahweh (as Shem was), and therefore a member of the Nations to which Yahweh’s Covenants are made with, one must be a racially non-mixed descendant of the progenitor pair of Adam and Eve. Jews today are of mixed heritage, proven to be just the same as Arabs genetically.
(
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/ne ... ds-1.75273).
This should be sufficient evidence for any person to conclude that those claiming to be Judeans (or by heritage Shemitic/Semitic), are simply NOT. For those Judeos reading this…just think about it…the Hittites and Amorites, Kenites etc (descendants of Cain) existed after the flood yes?...It is written so. Thus, these Hittite, Kenite etc bipods must exist in today’s populations somewhere, yes? The Scriptures show (as well as history shows) that these bipods conquered and mingled with many nations in Mesopotamia ( Noting here that the Isrealites went North (Jeremiah) and the Judeans were to keep away from the Jews and other races (Christ, et al)). If those claiming to be Judeans today are the same or very similar racial stock to the present Arabs in Mesopotamia, then they ALSO are simply in part descendants of the Hittites, Amorates, Kenites, Edomites. The only difference is, as will be shown below, that those claiming to be Judeans today were brought into the Judean society in the century or so period before Christ, then they proceded to usurp that society, and eventually falsely claimed for themselves the identity of Isreal itself. Then they moved into the Khazarian mongoliod territory, converted them to Judaism (which is their Babylonian traditions, after they had also usurped the original white Babylon), mixed with them, then on into Eastern and Middle Europe.
Not only are these facts not understood by Judeo-Christians, but even in the so-called “White Nationalist” movement these facts are overwhelmingly misunderstood. For example, the person that took over the Northwest American Territorial Imperative idea from Pastor Butler, in complete disrespect for Pastor Butler, still refers to those claiming to be Jews as “Hebes”, ie Hebrews. This is completely poisoning for the White peoples message, as any white person who is racially aware, but still stuck in Judeo-Christianity (and lets face it…this describes the majority of racially aware folk in the US) will not follow such a movement as he/she knows that God chose the Isrealites/Hebrews as His people. Such person will in the best case simply not get involved with such an imperative, and in the worst case be likely willing to fight a war against such an imperative. This is why I personally believe the litmus test for whether a person is sincere in the “Movement” is their position on the racial identity of those today that claim to be Judeans. If one cannot name the true identity of those today claiming to be Judeans, then such a person has no place in White Nationalism, Christian or not. It is simply a matter of historical accuracy.
Some argue that notwithstanding some non-Judean blood existing in Jews, Jews still have a racial connection to the Judeans of the Scriptures. As outlined above, such claim is ridiculous given firstly that this question must be first and foremost underpinned by the scriptural law for Adam Kind of not mixing with other ethnicities, a law that has never been revoked, not by Yahshua Christ, Paul of Tarsus, or anyone else.
Even though Israel largely lost the knowledge of who they were and largely followed pagan deities, they still held onto the racial laws, and family and community structures. Those Israelites that did not hold on to the racial laws simply ended up mixed (erub/Arab), as we can see today in lands that were formerly inhabited by the Adamic race, such as the Middle East, the Asian Sub-Continent, North Africa.
The main points to focus on in this topic are the following:
1. Edomites, the mixed race line of Esau, were absorbed into Judea at the time of John Hyrcanus’ defeat of them around 130BC. Hyrcanus permitted them to stay in the newly conquered lands if they followed Judean laws, customs, and beliefs, which they did.
"John Hyrcanus conquered the whole of Edom and undertook the forced conversion of it's inhabitants to Judaism." (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews XIII 9,1) (Note: the use of the term Judaism here by Josephus is incorrect, as the laws and customs of the Judeans to this period were not known as Judaism as such, as it is a latter employed term to describe the laws that the Herodic / Edomite dynasty infused into the territory and its inhabitants.)
“As for Judaea, its western extremities towards Casius are occupied by the Idumaeans (Edomites) and by the lake. The Idumaeans are Nabataeans, but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with”. (Strabo: Geographies: Book 16, Chapter 2, Para 34)
"Thenceforth the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people." (Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol 6, pg 378 [1971])
According to I Maccabees 5:3-8, the nation of Edom (Idumea) ceased to be in 126 BC when John Hyrcanus completed the conquest began in 163 BC by Judas Maccabeus, forcing the Edomites to be circumcised. According to Josephus - thereafter these Edomites were considered nothing other than Judeans.
Summary of Point One: The nation of Judea absorbed the neighboring Edomite peoples when the Judeans conquered Idumea. Therefore, from that point on Edomites were part of Judea. It follows that it must be analysed whether or not racial separation remained between the racial Judeans and the Edomites for the last approximately 2000 years. There is no evidence of this, therefore, they must be one mixed racial group. Which they are proven to be. Nothing more than Arabs, but with most having some Mongoloid blood infused with their mixture also with the Khazars.
2. The Herodic Dynasty rulers of Judea were racially Edomite. The Herods were not Judeans.
It was the Edomite Herods who ended the Judahite Maccabean dynasty and its Hasmonean high priestly family. It was the Herods who then appointed the high priests (including Annas), and took over the government of the Judeans, and finally lined up with Titus in the siege of Jerusalem.
“But there was a certain friend of Hycranus, an Idumean, called Antipater, who was very rich, and in his nature an active and a seditious man; who was at enmity with Aristobulus, and had differences with him on account of his good-will to Hyrcanus. It is true that Nicolaus of Damascus says, that Antipater was of the stock of the principal Jews who came out of Babylon into Judea; but that assertion of his was to gratify Herod, who was his son, and who, by certain revolutions of fortune, came afterward to be king of the Jews, whose history we shall give you in its proper place hereafter. However, this Antipater was at first called Antipas, and that was his father's name also; of whom they relate this: That king Alexander and his wife made him general of all Idumea, and that he made a league of friendship with those in Arabians, and Gazites, and Ascalonites that were of his own party, and had, by many and large presents, made them his fast friends. [11] But now this younger Antipator was suspicious of the power of Aristobulus, and was afraid of some mischief he might do him, because of his hatred to him; so he stirred up the most powerful of the Jews, and talked against him to them privately; and said that it was unjust to overlook the conduct of Aristobulus, who had got the government unrighteously, and ejected his brother out of it, who was the elder, and ought to retain what belonged to him by prerogative of his birth. [12] And the same speeches he perpetually made to Hyrcanus; and told him that his own life would be in danger, unless he guarded himself, and got shut of Aristobulus; for he said that the friends of Aristobulus omitted no opportunity of advising him to kill him, as being then, and not before, sure to retain his principality. [13] Hyrcanus gave no credit to these words of his, as being of a gentle disposition, and one that did not easily admit of calumnies against other men. This temper of his not disposing him to meddle with public affairs, and want of spirit, occasioned him to appear to spectators to be degenerate and unmanly; while Aristobulus was of a contrary temper, an active man, and one of a great and generous soul”. (Josephus, Antiquities Book 14, Chapter 1, Para 3)
(Note the mechanisms of deception used by Herod to gain power: using the good and friendly nature of the racially pure Judean to intimidate and deceive).
“Herodes had now a strong army; and as he marched on, Antigonus laid snares and ambushes in the passes and places most proper for them; but in truth he thereby did little or no damage to the enemy. [400] So Herodes received those of his family out of, and the fortress Oresa, and then went on for Jerusalem. The soldiery also that was with Silo accompanied him all along, as did many of the citizens, being afraid of his power; [401] and as soon as he had pitched his camp on the west side of the city, the soldiers that were set to guard that part shot their arrows and threw their darts at him; [402] and when some sallied out in a crowd, and came to fight hand to hand with the first ranks of Herodes's army, he gave orders that they should, in the first place, make proclamation about the wall, that he came for the good of the people, and for the preservation of the city, and not to bear any old grudge at even his most open enemies, but ready to forget the offences which his greatest adversaries had done him. [403] But, by way of reply to what Herodes had caused to be proclaimed, and this before the Romans, and before Silo also, said that they would not do justly, if they gave the kingdom to Herodes, who was no more than a private man, and an, i.e. a half Jew, whereas they ought to bestow it on one of the royal family, as their custom was”; (Antiquities, Book 14, Chapter 15, Para 2)
Overall, one must view the question of race in the context of the Adamic family. If one is of mixed race, then one cannot be part of the Adamic family, as Yahweh’s racial laws prohibit race mixing, and there is no such thing as evolution to account for the multitude of races.
Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Matthew 7 16-19 KJV
