More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

[Lang]

I didn't know she was a race-mixer. All I knew is a lot of people on SF talk about her because she wrote a book on Hitler, and said he was the 7th Avatar or something like that, lol.

[Les]

Savitri Devi "The Lightning and The Sun" is a great book.

I am surprised to hear she was a racemixer, since her book was recommended to me by National Socialists and sympathizers from the WWII era.

[Joe]

Her 'husband'. Kind-of discredits everything she says. I think some white women have non-white 'husbands' as part of their rebellion against God. Idolatry/race-mixing.

[Lang]

Once a NS pagan had a half indian girlfriend and told me she was metaphisically blonde and blue-eyed, and she had a great connection to the gods and had an aryan soul. This is the only bad pagan Ive known personally though. My personal experience with pagans is not bad. Most of them that I know follow all aspects of the Law due to logic and common sense, except they don't believe in God. Far better than both jewdeo christians and liberals.

[SwordBrethren]

There seem to be a lot of desperate losers on SF, textbook omega/beta males.

A reasonable/successful/normal guy explained he was on a date with a woman and she casually [yet seriously] declared that she and her brother used to torture and shoot/kill cats and dogs when they were teenagers. He said he immediately ended the date and got the hell out of there.

One of the losers, username Analyst, then commented that it would "take a lot more than that for me to lose interest in a woman."

Only a complete desperate loser would be content to continue associating with a woman who just seriously stated that she has a history of torturing and murdering animals.


The absolute worst is that guy LetsGoBlues who is in every other thread in the singles section asking for advice, getting the same advice [crappy advice from feminist men and women about women like "nice guys" and then reasonable advice from the few people on SF who seem to understand female hypergamy and its implications for men], disregarding the advice, and then going off like a broken record with the same crap. He actually wants people on SF to write his lines for him so he can send an email reply to a "hottie" he met online. People are telling him to "be yourself" but that clearly isn't working because he's a creepy desperate loser and he communicates it in every single post.

Desperate loser men who accept women that are unworthy of attention/affection/dating/mating/marriage, contribute greatly to the problems caused by feminism. No matter how bad women misbehave, there is never any shortage of desperate men ready to accept them and their atrociously poor behavior.



Lang and I were discussing this on skype-


[7/23/2014 10:17:20 PM] SB/ME: blacks are very forward with women

[7/23/2014 10:17:22 PM] SB/ME: especially white women

[7/23/2014 10:17:29 PM] SB/ME: most White men won't even approach a White woman to say "hello"

[7/23/2014 10:17:48 PM] SB/ME: blacks will hover around them, "can I get yo number? yo number girl, you got it going on, damn girl you fine, what yo number?"

[7/23/2014 10:18:00 PM] Lang: lol!

[7/23/2014 10:18:08 PM] SB/ME: White men can barely even say "hey" to a woman

[7/23/2014 10:18:20 PM] Lang: this is true for most part

[7/23/2014 10:18:46 PM] Lang: white men nowadays have become shy

[7/23/2014 10:19:03 PM] SB/ME: women gravitate towards criminals, gangsters, and bank gangsters

[7/23/2014 10:19:04 PM] Lang: basically all young men of SF are shy/get bullyied in school

[7/23/2014 10:19:07 PM] SB/ME: because they take what they want

[7/23/2014 10:19:09 PM] SB/ME: they decide what they want

[7/23/2014 10:19:11 PM] SB/ME: and they take what they want

[7/23/2014 10:19:19 PM] SB/ME: most of the people on SF are whimps

[7/23/2014 10:19:20 PM] SB/ME: pansies

[7/23/2014 10:19:37 PM] SB/ME: one guy on there, LetsGoBlues, absolute loser, he said he was trying to talk to a girl in a gym and a "taller/bigger" guy told him to get lost

[7/23/2014 10:19:39 PM] SB/ME: f**k that

[7/23/2014 10:20:24 PM] SB/ME: I was on my own , in a computer lab, on campus, in my undergrad college, and 6 Mestizo/Romanian Gypsies/mongrel freaks [5 men 1 woman] were making noise, throwing hard candy at each other, throwing a ball back and forth, dry humping the Roma girl, throwing spit wads at people, singing

[7/23/2014 10:20:24 PM] SB/ME: etc

[7/23/2014 10:20:41 PM] SB/ME: I finally SCREAMED, "THIS IS A COMPUTER LAB! PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO WORK! TAKE IT OUTSIDE IF YOU WON'T BE QUIET!"

[7/23/2014 10:21:03 PM] SB/ME: one of them leapt from his seat, ready to rush me, but the leader of the pack smacked him in the chest, said, "don't you know who that is? sit down and shut up"

[7/23/2014 10:21:06 PM] SB/ME: and he sat back down

[7/23/2014 10:21:33 PM] SB/ME: if the guy had advanced on me, my plan was to pepper spray him in the face and stick him with a knife that I had concealed behind my back

[7/23/2014 10:21:46 PM] SB/ME: a few minutes later they all left the computer lab, after I had yelled at them

[7/23/2014 10:21:54 PM] SB/ME: so what if there were 5 boys

[7/23/2014 10:21:55 PM] SB/ME: f**k that

[7/23/2014 10:22:11 PM] SB/ME: LetsGoBlues won't even stand up for himself and tell one guy in a gym to "get lost"

[7/23/2014 10:22:21 PM] SB/ME: does he really think some random idiot in a gym is going to assault him for talking to a woman?

[7/23/2014 10:22:37 PM] SB/ME: I gave it about an 80% chance that at least one of the mongrels was going to rush me, it didn't stop me from telling them all to calm the f**k down

[7/23/2014 10:23:32 PM] SB/ME: worst case scenario he gets roughed up at the gym and he can file an assault lawsuit against the thug and then a negligence lawsuit against the gym and pocket 20-50k

[7/23/2014 10:23:48 PM] SB/ME: worst case scenario with those mongrels, the first one charges me, gets sprayed and stabbed and his friends scatter [and then the action has to be defended in court].

[7/23/2014 10:23:50 PM] Lang: its good to be strong/know how to fight before doing this though. the gym case however was idiotic, no woman will like him if he let people talk to him like that

[7/23/2014 10:24:20 PM] SB/ME: another time when I was on campus, leaving the cafeteria, walking on my way out, going by a table, there were 6 white kids [preppy, whigger, etc] sitting around

[7/23/2014 10:24:31 PM] SB/ME: they were clearly laughing at me, probably my large hands-free head set on my cell phone

[7/23/2014 10:25:41 PM] SB/ME: so I walked over and called out to the obvious leader, "say, what's so funny? are you laughing at me? What are you laughing at? Tell me, I want to laugh to, I like to laugh, so tell me, what's so funny? is there something wrong with me?" and he started to stutter, he looked over at one of his friends, and I said, "don't look at him, look at me, I'm talking to you, look at me when I'm talking to you, what's so funny? you're not laughing anymore, what was so funny?"

[7/23/2014 10:25:56 PM] SB/ME: and he shook his head, "Nothing, nothing, I just thought you had a neat looking head-set for your phone, that's all"

[7/23/2014 10:26:05 PM] SB/ME: and I said, "oh okay, thanks, it is pretty neat, isn't it?"

[7/23/2014 10:26:14 PM] SB/ME: and then I left

[7/23/2014 10:26:26 PM] SB/ME: not a single one of them had balls

[7/23/2014 10:27:50 PM] SB/ME: but now that I have trained BJJ for about 4 years and I carry a pistol with me everywhere I go, I don't approach as****es, even if they are laughing at me, not worth the risk of escalation into a lethal situation

[7/23/2014 10:28:10 PM] SB/ME: but I am comfortable and confident in the knowledge that I can probably destroy any common street thug with hand-to-hand/grappling

[7/23/2014 10:28:13 PM] SB/ME: and if not, I have a pistol

[7/23/2014 10:28:28 PM] SB/ME: carrying a gun you have to learn to ignore idiots laughing at you

[7/23/2014 10:28:38 PM] SB/ME: but I would NEVER be told to "get lost" by some random guy if I were talking to a woman

[Joe]

Those whigger kids are the ones who have to worry about women and their future, they probably don't have any conception-of or plan for the future. Just stumbling through life, like the bastards, like wandering stars.

With your ability, you, God willing, can succeed at whatever you endeavour to accomplish. If a woman wanted to put you in the 'friends zone', that is a joke. Personally I would just laugh and walk away. That means she wasn't in your league to begin with. Now you know, she told you herself. Good women are rare, you have to go through much to find a good one. It is natural, the bad-ones are all too common.

Why worry about female hypergamy with a mind like yours? ...dumb, fat, balding, short guys have to have something a woman seeks, and even then it would only be the lower class women and whores generally. Women who can not aspire to better things but iPhones and magazines. But you can set your own standards. You decide.

I keep focused on what I want to do. Women will sort themselves out, for their own good. So that they can have good babies. lol.

One time a nigger challenged me to a fight after I said his stupid fake diamond earrings were something my Grandma would wear. My immediate reaction was to laugh heartily and sincerely. It knew it couldn't win, it was enraged but couldn't do anything lol. Then I told it, anytime. I wish I knew what I know now, there are times when I was all-too-kind to bastards at my own peril.

God Bless.

[SwordBrethren]

Those whigger kids are the ones who have to worry about women and their future, they probably don't have any conception-of or plan for the future. Just stumbling through life, like the bastards, like wandering stars.

With your ability, you, God willing, can succeed at whatever you endeavour to accomplish. If a woman wanted to put you in the 'friends zone', that is a joke. Personally I would just laugh and walk away. That means she wasn't in your league to begin with. Now you know, she told you herself. Good women are rare, you have to go through much to find a good one. It is natural, the bad-ones are all too common.

The best way to deal with the much-dreaded "friends zone" is to simply crush the attempt as soon as it is unleashed.

When a woman says, "let's just be friends" you need to instantly retort with something along the lines of, "I already have enough friends, no thanks." Because being friends with her will NEVER lead to anything more, anything meaningful. She will just drain you emotionally, financially, and spiritually, having you clean up her messes involving other men.

[Joe]

^No worries.
I know that is what men generally say to do.

Personally, I have never had any woman say that to me, I usually know when a woman likes me, those are the women I am honestly most attracted to.
I don't want to apply pressure (this is needy in my view), it might be a test, I don't care. It is funny. I laugh and she thinks about it (either way, I win, she repents, I win). It's my way or no way. I don't want endless talking, I don't want a friend, I don't need her for anything. I probably won't change my mind. I don't want a girl who doesn't like me or is manipulative. I don't want to chase her. She will end-up trying to prove that she is a good girl to me.

One girl was rude when I met her (like many dumb girls), I just ignored her every-time I spoke to her friends, just 'ok' then keeping talking to others. She wanted me to escort her to her car and other nonsense ...I just called the security guard to do it. "What if the security guard doesn't come". lol. She kept trying. She ended up running away crying and never came back to class. I am not trying to be an ass or arrogant, but she did learn her lesson. I didn't say or do anything mean (another girl heard what she was saying to me and said something mean to her).

I really did learn much about PUA when I was young, I really don't want to read about it anymore. I don't want to 'game'.
I am not trying to sound stuck-up. But I know what type I want. I'd rather be alone than be with a dumb girl. Truly. As I am. I am not very social.

I still don't understand why you'd be worried about hypergamy, are you aware that many PUA's go out of their way to show that they can take a woman out on a bus while living in a cheap apartment...
I mean I don't care what PUAs say, but you seem to be following some of those ideas...

Don't you think your articulate nature and mind kind of sets you above the ignorant masses. You are in a higher caste anyways. I am not trying to elevate you, I am just saying that a classy girl will recognize that, and if she can't ...well then she'll never know you/understand you. What kind-of relationship would that be. a classy girl would fear/respect her man, just as we fear God. She would look for a principled man.

I think direction, knowing where you're going, being a decision-maker is thus much more attractive to women than hypergamy. My brother told me this too.

[bahr]

While the most of us always see problems like feminism through moral and ideological (or legal) perspectives, which is good in itself of course, maybe we tend to forget that we are in the empire of the merchants, which means that ALL things are money for them, souls included (Rev 18:11-13). So I find it very interesting that some intelligent people amongst what we generally call "left wing" begin to see the lies in which they themselves believed not so long ago. Here is an excerpt from a paper titled "Who is Ted Bundy?" by Miles Mathis (http://mileswmathis.com/bundy.pdf). Of course, he talks about military intelligence, CIA and all that, but we know who run these institutions.

...
Communism had been destroyed domestically—everybody knew that—so they needed a different way
to create general fear. One of the ways they decided to do that was with manufactured bogeymen of the
Manson, Bundy type. Manson's bogeyman was created as a hippie in order to destroy the hippie
movement, and he was incredibly successful in his role. But by 1975 the hippie movement was also
dead, so the bogeymen no longer needed to be of that mold. They now wished to demonize the good-
looking white guy. Why? Several reasons. First of all, the charismatic, college-educated white guy
was still the most dangerous person in the eyes of Intelligence at that time, since in 1975 he still had the
most real power. The good-looking white guy had been the biggest thorn in their side during the hippie
movement and the war protest movement. They had been the high-profile speakers with the most
bravery, tenacity, and the greatest ability to sway a crowd. Therefore, Intelligence wanted to recruit all
the charismatic white guys they could into their agencies, and hog-tie the rest.

Intelligence also wished to create as much sexual dissatisfaction as they could, because they found it
helped sales in all areas. The dissatisfied bought more drugs, more liquor, more guns, more magazines,
more newspapers, watched more TV, and were generally easier to propagandize on all issues. And this
time, the focus was on women. If Intelligence could make women fear all men—especially the good-
looking ones—they would immediately create huge levels of sexual dissatisfaction. These women
would then watch soap operas and read pulp romances and join feminist groups, where they could be
further propagandized. They would suffer from a thousand forms of anxiety and all the mental and
physical effects of that anxiety, which would require a million forms of drugging and therapy, legal and
illegal. And as the women went, so did the men. If the heterosexual women could be driven nuts, the
heterosexual men would be taken down with them. The sexual relationship is like that: if you destroy
one half of it, the other half falls as well.

Of course this is still the program, and it seeds Oprah's empire as well as half the hospitals. It seeds the
pharmaceutical industry, the porn industry, Hollywood, the cosmetic industry, radical feminism,
women's studies, men's studies, postmodern art, and a thousand worthless TV channels.

If you or the CIA wonders why I am researching these things like a fiend, it is because my life has been
ruined by these programs. In previous papers you have seen how the CIA's (now admitted) control and
destruction of art during the 20 th century would affect someone like me, but these sexual destabilization programs are also ruinous, and I take them personally. Like the rest of the heterosexual male population, I have been forced to try to date these women who have been brought up on a constant fare of planted stories of the Manson, Bundy type. I can point to many specific instances with real women where Manson, Bundy, or one of the other mainstream figments was brought up in conversation as a source of their anxieties. And it continues up to this day, with the manufactured events we see in the papers daily, many of them aimed directly at young women.

The government has been manufacturing tragedies year by year for decades, and we are now up to
several a month, just to keep the patient properly traumatized. It used to be that one fake serial killer
every couple of years would do the job, but in this as in everything else, the patient develops a
tolerance. After 911, the audience became more difficult to startle. In addition to your daily dose of
shootings, maulings, rapes, suicides, crashes and molestations (most of them also manufactured for
your viewing pleasure by the Intelligence agencies), you are now privy to at least one mass shooting or
bombing every two or three months. It was found that the serial killer story took too long to unwind, so
they ditched that. You don't get serial killers much anymore. It is mass shootings instead, since they
happen all at once. The American public no longer has the attention span required to follow a serial
killer. Think about that, please. Don't you think it is convenient that crazy murderers decided to quit
the serial thing and go in for the mass thing instead? So nice of them to change with the times,
scripting their madness to fit the demands of the media!
...

[SwordBrethren]

I still don't understand why you'd be worried about hypergamy, are you aware that many PUA's go out of their way to show that they can take a woman out on a bus while living in a cheap apartment...
I mean I don't care what PUAs say, but you seem to be following some of those ideas...

Hypergamy is a problem because even if you think you're on the top, there is always somebody above you.

A millionaire has to contend with a multi-millionaire, a multi-millionaire has to contend with a billionaire.

If you're a paramedic with a steady job dating a nurse you have to contend with a doctor.

A minor league athlete has to contend with major league athletes.


Female hypergamy is such that women are almost always looking for a better deal, looking to trade up. They always think the grass is greener somewhere else.


A lion has only a short amount of time to mate and make sure his cubs can make it to adulthood before he is challenged and dethroned. It has been said that a lion who is an alpha male in a pride has at most three years before he is successfully challenged by new-comers.

When you're on the top in your situation, there are always plenty of people looking to take what you have or to dethrone you, and you're never going to be where you are indefinitely.

There is always somebody who is going to be smarter, stronger, quicker, more energetic, more determined, more cunning, etc.


The key to avoiding female hypergamy is to realize that women are largely replaceable. I don't mean to denigrate or demean them and suggest they are replaceable in the sense of, "I got tired of that one, I'll get a new one" but in the sense of, "I am secure and happy in life, if the woman leaves me, so what, I won't let it upset or derail my life, I can get another woman, there are plenty of women around, life goes on."

A man's life can never revolve around a woman, he has to be his own man. A woman is replaceable, she can walk out on you on a moment's notice and your life should still go on. The tragedy is that today a woman tries to throw the man out of his house and take his stuff. A woman, as a feature in a man's life, is easily replaceable, his house, his car, etc, those are not as easily replaced, because those things represent years of the man's productivity and toil and he can not easily get those back, he can easily land another woman.


When a man puts a woman on a pedestal above himself he will struggle to be able to attain her because he has placed her above himself, and if/when he does attain her, he will never be able to satisfy her because she will see herself as above him and everything he does will be inadequate and it will be heavily criticized. Never elevate a woman above yourself. Plenty of Israelite kings fell hard because they were focused on chasing women or playing games with women.

What was it that one movie said, "if you build it, he will come."

If a man builds himself a life, women will come. "If you build it, she will come."

I would advise men to stop chasing women, stop trying to play games to get women, be the man you want to be, be your own man, build your life, and women will gravitate towards you. Women are drawn to success and confidence like a moth to a flame.

That is my main gripe with PUA game lifestyle [aside from being opposed to empty fornication on moral grounds], it is a validation of female supremacy in the sense that it teaches men to seek validation by how much attention they can garner from women by putting on an act and jumping through hoops, going through motions, to get female attention. Basically the man has to become an actor, learn a script, and play a role, to get attention from the woman. In this sense "getting the woman" is the object of the "game" and the woman is the prize.