More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

[SwordBrethren]

I can't remember who said it in this thread, but men are allowed to remain emotional teenagers far too late into their lives, only having to be accountable for their lives in their twenties. Marriages must necessarily begin earlier because given teenagers' proximity to each other, rampant hormones and the frowning on of early marriage, we actually have an incredibly unfair system which actually promotes fornication! It is so completely backwards and the damage it does is evident.

This ^. Exactly what happens today.

I think most men look around and decide that women who have had dozens of partners are not worth committing to, and when men do not want to commit to women and lose interest in that, they have little need to work 50-60 hours per week, they have little need to obtain high-paying professional employment, because they can provide for their own immediate needs working 30 hours per week and then use the rest of their time to do whatever suits them.


Women control sex, men control commitment. Women decide when sex happens, men decide when commitment happens. If men are not committing to women it is NOT the fault of the men, the men have measured the women and found them wanting in one or more categories, in other words the men have evaluated the women and found them unworthy of commitment.

[Lang]

I think most men look around and decide that women who have had dozens of partners are not worth committing to, and when men do not want to commit to women and lose interest in that, they have little need to work 50-60 hours per week, they have little need to obtain high-paying professional employment, because they can provide for their own immediate needs working 30 hours per week and then use the rest of their time to do whatever suits them.


Women control sex, men control commitment. Women decide when sex happens, men decide when commitment happens. If men are not committing to women it is NOT the fault of the men, the men have measured the women and found them wanting in one or more categories, in other words the men have evaluated the women and found them unworthy of commitment.

Back in time when women tried to be sweet and innocent instead of super hot like they do now, when they tried to be as much virtuous as possible, when they counted on us as their providers and loving husbands, men felt totally responsible for them, and treated them in the best way possible, as princesses. In those days romantism, chivalry, etc, was a common thing. Now, when they decided they don't need men anymore, they will work and "date" whoever they want to, and do whatever they want to, when they tried to be free of their counter-parts, automatically men stopped caring for them and all romantism died. Men started seeing them as sexual objects, because that is precisely what they wanted to be. The end of committment and romantism in the part of men happened because women dismissed it. You can't want to be both "independent and do whatever you want" and at the same time demand full commitment and romantism, that is called worship.

[Lang]

There is a music which reminds me of what we are talking here. Here is the lyrics,very fascinating:

Your great-great grandfather cleared the earth
Your great-grandfather laboured on the earth
Your grandfather turned a profit from the earth
Then your father sold the earth to become a bureaucrat

Now you, my little man, you don’t know what to do
In your little three room apartment – too expensive and cold in the winter
You want something to call your own
And you dream at night of having your own little piece of earth.

Your great great grandmother, she had 14 kids
Your great grandmother had about as many
Then your grandmother had three, that was enough for her
Your mom didn’t want any, you were an accident

Now you, my little lady, change partners all the time
When you screw up you save yourself by aborting
But there are mornings you awake crying
When you dream in the night of a large table surrounded by little ones.

Your great great grandfather lived the Great Misery
Your great grandfather collected used, dirty pennies
Then your grandfather became a millionaire
Your father inherited some of it and put it into RRSPs

Now you, my little youth, owe your ass to the government
No way to get a loan from a financial institution
To aleviate your desire to hold up a bank
You read books about voluntary simplicity

Your great great grandparents knew how to celebrate
Your great grandparent danced the night away
Your grandparents saw the birth of Rock'n'Roll
Your parents, it was discos, that’s where they met

Now you, my friend, what are you doing with your evening?
Turn off your TV, can’t stay locked inside
Happily, some things in life never change
Put on your best, we’re going out tonight dancing!

[Joe]

I guess most men 'commit' to women at the drop of a hat, women abuse this to get what they want. I think that standing by my principles is important. That is where authority and direction comes from.
Men with authority won't be forsaking their principles to 'commit to'/impress some whore. Men with principles will ignore whores, stand-by their principles and hold-back their commitment to meet one who meets their terms. Women seek attention/validation from authoritarian/masculine figures.
Most PUA's work by submitting to the whims (chaotic psychological traits) of women. This cannot be good long-term ...you would need to find a different whore every week. lol, I guess they have found a 'solution' that works in these times. Women made the PUA, I guess you could say ...by controlling sex in such a way.

Good lyrics Lang. I don't know how true they are, I don't know what our great grand-parents were like.

@Nayto
Edit: Of-course I think the man should support his family and wife. But in the past I think it was almost assured that a young man would be able to do this, there wasn't so much focus on money or excessive materialism. Women were probably more concerned with finding a good-match. Like in the Third-Reich, as long as the man had a good job and some time at home; they could live very happily. And I am sure they did.
Most men who wanted to work, could work. These days there is no job security and work is not even assured for young men who are fit and healthy. When I was poor, it was not because I was lazy ...I was working and studying. I had potential lol. My parents married poor because my father took a break from work to ride around Australia. lol.
These days many men are lazy, so perhaps women are more paranoid about such things. I don't think most women seek a rich guy. I am sure a good white girl, a Christian girl especially, would choose right. In my country there are some famous women with -zero- skills married to old rich guys. This is deplorable. They get what they deserve. A good marriage is more valuable.

[Staropramen]

Our race is screwed up. Male and female.

[Lang]

Men with authority won't be forsaking their principles to 'commit to'/impress some whore.

Savitri Devi once said that she could never love a man who loved her more than he loved his ideals

[Staropramen]

Prepare to be sick;

http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/yourcommuni ... sters.html

[Fenwick]

"Now that the New York Times has officially declared beards to be a trend, that trend is, by necessity, over," wrote Scott Christian.

"See, Times trends stories are like a quantum physics paradox, where, by examining the existence of something, they cause it to no longer exist," he continued.

Liberals worry about such weird things. Racial degradation and childkilling don't raise a flicker of interest, but OH NO TIMES IS TALKING ABOUT BEARDS

[NicoChristian]

Men with authority won't be forsaking their principles to 'commit to'/impress some whore.

Savitri Devi once said that she could never love a man who loved her more than he loved his ideals

I'm not trying to start an argument or anything, but Savitri Devi was a race-mixer and a Christian hater. I once read one of her books praising Genghis Khan, while denouncing Charlemagne as the Saxon-slayer, as well as other nonsense. She married some filthy brown Indian while supposedly promoting White purity. I'd prefer not to quote such an individual.

[Staropramen]

Men with authority won't be forsaking their principles to 'commit to'/impress some whore.

Savitri Devi once said that she could never love a man who loved her more than he loved his ideals

I'm not trying to start an argument or anything, but Savitri Devi was a race-mixer and a Christian hater. I once read one of her books praising Genghis Khan, while denouncing Charlemagne as the Saxon-slayer, as well as other nonsense. She married some filthy brown Indian while supposedly promoting White purity. I'd prefer not to quote such an individual.

Greetings Nico, glad to see you posting again. Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't know who this woman was but I recognized the name from somewhere. Then it occurred to me that it was on SF that I used to see her name pop up now and then. Looking at the Wiki article I can see why she has fans over there. White pagans will glady embrace such a person before they would embrace a true Christian.

Lang: the substance of the quote is a good one but may I suggest in the future if you feel that it's contextually appropriate to quote such a person it's probably a good idea to also add a statement of disassociation for folks that might perhaps otherwise get a wrong idea about such people.