This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.
# Population (source) Distance
1 utahn-white (1000genomes) 4.28
2 n-european (xing) 5.29
3 utahn-white (hapmap) 5.61
4 british (1000genomes) 5.97
5 french (hgdp) 7.01
6 orcadian (hgdp) 8.67
7 hungarian (behar) 9.76
8 slovenian (xing) 11.18
9 ukranian (yunusbayev) 17.41
10 spaniard (behar) 19.24
# Population Percent
1 North_European 42.6
2 Atlantic_Med 39.75
3 Caucasus 8.56
4 Gedrosia 7.51
Lang wrote:Isn't England first settled by phoenicians? That could be an explanation for the meds or the spaniard genes.
And what is Gedrosia?
The Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype is the most common Y-DNA signature of Europe’s most common Haplogroup, R-M269. Simply put your ancestors have experienced a dramatic population explosion over the past 10,000 years, probably since the end of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM-that’s Anthropology-speak for the last Ice Age) that covered most of Europe beginning 20,000 years ago and lasting for 10,000 long cold winters.
R1b, and its most common Haplotype (yours), exists in high or very high frequencies in all of Western Europe from Spain in the south to the British Isles and western Scandinavia in the north. It appears that approximately 2.62% in Western European males share this most common genetic 12 marker signature and because of its very high frequency we always suggest that for genealogy purposes people in this group should only use our 25 or 37 marker test for their genealogy.
Anthropologists have been describing for many years that only a select % of all the males in past societies did the vast majority of fathering, while other males lost the opportunity to pass on their Y-Chromosomal genes.
On a lighter note it’s clear that R1b’s Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype has contributed much more than its ‘fair share’ in populating Western Europe.
If the proto IE carrying R1b M269 or R1b L11 really originated around the Black sea area we would expect a higher rate of Caucasus component than the Gedrosia one for the British or Basque people for instance. But the Irish in the Dodecad project have 1,5% of Caucasus and 9,5% of Gedrosia and the French Basque have 0,1% of Caucasus vs 7,6% of Gedrosia.
As we know, the Basque do have really low frequencies of "neolithic haplogroup" such as G2a, EV13, J1, T etc. we can conclude that the Caucasus component (only 0,1% among French Basque but 22,3% for Otzi) only represents the neolithic legacy of men carying G2a, EV13, J1 etc.
So we have the caucasus admixture related to Neolithic farmers and R1b somewhat related to the Gedrosia admixture in Northwestern Europe (and in the Basque country).
It really looks like R1b men came to Europe directly from an area East of the Caspian sea without settling around the Black sea area (Maykopp etc) .
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/27 ... f-R1b-M269
Lang wrote:Isn't England first settled by phoenicians?
David raised it to pre-eminence over the tribes and the nations. He is the first king of the Judah-Pharez line, and he did not appear for seven hundred years. Was there and is there an older line of royalty? The answer is, Yes. The Judah-Zerah [line] was royal from the beginning. The two royalties are now merged and have been for centuries in the British [Covenant people] royal house. And how long shall we have royalty? ‘Until Shiloh comes.’ [The future] Shiloh came to Bethlehem, the first Advent, and will come again [as Shiloh] at the end of time, the second Advent. Royalty is eternal. The throne of David is everlasting. There is no royalty in Europe but descends from Judah.
http://emahiser.christogenea.org/three-tribes-judah
wmfinck wrote:Visser has been calling this the "no devil" camp for months, if not longer, in direct contradiction to everything that I present concerning Scripture. He evidently cannot stand the fact that Mark and I can get along so well in spite of our differences of opinion on some scriptures. Therefore he resorts to slandering me. He has no concept of true fellowship in Christ. Neither does he realize that Christ and race are actually more important than labels and politics.
Filidh wrote:if he's preaching universalism rather than denying his wife whom he falsely believes to be a bastard (most DNA tests are complete unscience, that's all there is to say and there's no nice way of saying it so there it is.), then wouldn't the easiest way to win him back over be to convince him of the proven fact that DNA tests are bullshit?
universalism is evil, but i'd rather see a universalist come to dualseedline than for that universalist to continue believing in universalism because of an unscientific test that proves absolutely less than nothing.
in other words, what if he really loves his wife and is unwilling to give her up because he knows in his heart that she's white even tho the unscientific falsetest says otherwise.
i don't know anything of the situation other than what's in this thread, so i may be entirely in the wrong, but it's worth a shot at least, i figure.
edit: said most dna tests are false instead of all
Return to Christian Identity Directions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests