This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.
Les wrote:You maybe wonder why some of us drink?
The old story.
To drown our sorrows.
Les wrote:You maybe wonder why some of us drink?
The old story.
To drown our sorrows.
Kentucky wrote:The argument is not really drunkenness, it is who is going to decide where you draw the line between moderation and drunkenness. And, of course, that is left up to the individual, not God....
Kentucky wrote:The Fall of Adam and Eve was due to the fact that they could not remove from their own mind any and all thoughts of indulging in that forbidden fruit (it really doesn't matter whether it was sex or an apple or whatever); they crossed the line and spoiled their glorified bodies. The curse has been with us ever since. I don't want to pop your bubble, but the principle of removing or banning or destroying the idols of the heart, which is the ultimate source of sin, is not without precedence in the Bible....
Kentucky wrote:Honestly, what was the higher good of Prohibition? Was it not saving lives? Or were these Christians just party poopers?
Luke 11:46 wrote:And [Jesus] said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Kentucky wrote:If you like statistics, I think during that era, you will see a decrease in alcohol-related deaths, not to mention the misery and tragedies that accompanied a wet society, which the nation reverted to after repeal....
Kentucky wrote:One last thing, as I said earlier, I'm not bashing any of my friends in this forum who indulge in recreational drinking and know how much is too much. I am simply stating truths as I understand them for myself and for the edification of one and all; one is free to take it or leave it. But, please don't take it personally. It's just a subject that needs discussion.
Kentucky wrote:If there is no alcohol (booze), then there is no lives destroyed from it.
Kentucky wrote:Why did Yahweh accept strong drink offerings,
From my understanding of Numbers 28:7, it was the best of the best liquors (perhaps figs or some other fruit) and not wine of the grape; and according to Exodus 30:9 drink offerings were not to be poured upon an altar of incense (no doubt it would douse the ember), but the drink offering could be poured on the lamb, the altar of burnt sacrifice. “A fourth of hin” in my margin note says that was about 6 quarts, which must have been a sizable quantity of the good stuff. Perhaps God thought it better that they pour it on the lamb than pouring it down their throats.and why was alcohol not barred in the Law?
Probably because it would have conflicted with medicinal purposes for the elderly sick and as an anesthetic for those about to die (Prov. 31:6-7). Although I've seen some with hangovers who look like their dying lol. Was “barred” a pun?
Kentucky wrote:and why was alcohol not barred in the Law?
Probably because it would have conflicted with medicinal purposes for the elderly sick and as an anesthetic for those about to die (Prov. 31:6-7). Although I've seen some with hangovers who look like their dying lol. Was “barred” a pun?
Mark
Genesis chapter 14 wrote: 18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. 19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth.
Luke 22:18 wrote: 17 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves: 18 For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.
Nayto wrote:All things being held constant, sure. The reality is that much has changed since the Law was given. Alcohol is much more readily available to people now. I won't pretend to know exactly the situation then, but I don't think anyone could have gotten up, walked to the store and blown their paycheck on alcohol.
wmfinck wrote:Nayto wrote:All things being held constant, sure. The reality is that much has changed since the Law was given. Alcohol is much more readily available to people now. I won't pretend to know exactly the situation then, but I don't think anyone could have gotten up, walked to the store and blown their paycheck on alcohol.
Actually, access to alcohol probably has a lot more to do with environment than economics. On a farm or in some other rural setting, it would be easy to have constant access to alcohol, which would not require a paycheck. All you need are some grapes and a barrel.
We should be able to distinguish the concepts of alcohol consumption and alcohol abuse. Drinking wine or beer does not lead to alcoholism any more than owning a gun leads to murder.
I am certain that nobody here would ever promote alcohol abuse.
But alcohol consumption is something which God Himself did not deny, and even created the circumstances for it as a natural part of His creation.
So we should teach moderation and self-control, and not prohibitionism and state control.
1 Corinthians 5:9-13 wrote:I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
Nayto wrote:I grew up with two alcoholics and maybe I'm more sensitive to its affects on the lives of others both financially and emotionally.
Nayto wrote:If we advocate self control, then what are the protocols for dealing with drunkards? If Paul said drunkards are not allowed into the Kingdom of God, doesn't that at the very least have implications on the company we ought to keep? To me that means we need to shun drunkards in the same way we might shun thieves, murderers, race mixers, etc.
wmfinck wrote:This is a freaking epidemic! We have to ban water!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests