Maybe Nayto, being a good communicator, can get through to Lang.
I am not the best communicator, I tried to get Lang to understand that it doesn't matter how much money you have, how many people (the masses) are on your side, what system or technology you have ...you cannot fix the white race or preserve them. I would rather have faith in God, then some delusion.
Lang would completely miss the point and continue to talk about economics and shared his new view on racial purity, which is not racial purity at all, but is a compromise made to accept mongrels.
I left him to his proud delusions.
Here I will let people decide on Lang's words for themselves, this is fairer than me giving my interpretation of it. But I do think I made a reasonable assessment. I think some clever WN have swayed his view bit by bit Nayto.
We don't have the technology to establish a country with an exact, scientific 100% purity, technically speaking. And I don't believe it would be doable or rational to do so. Genetics is much more complicated than we know. But it is totally possible to have a country in which every individual look, acts and feels like one, in practice. If science is driven towards study on genetics though, we could manipulate the next generation's reproduction genetically to pre-select their genes and make them born with almost perfection, even creating a new species of super whites. Like selecting their traits to be good athletes, sharp minded, etc. But this is way ahead in the future.
A generation of super whites who are possibly mongrels and don't care about God.
Regarding genetics, there is a reasonable approach, and a dogmatic approach. The first deals with what I call "european 100%", the second deals with what I call the "absolute 100%". Let's take Portugal for example. First the rational approach - the programme would make the population be Portuguese, and motivate Germanic/northern settlers to come in if possible, to contribute with their genes. But that aprox. 20% part of Portugal that is clearly mongrel, that part would be sent off, so you have in the worst of situations at least a Portuguese Portugal. However, certainly a few non white genes here and there would remain in their population, evidently. Impossible to take it all off. That would be hard to spot, because there would be no difference between one to other. So they would progress from there, aiming for infinite betterment. If there were need to advance technology enough to test the crap out of people, because otherwise no one would spot difference, then in that case it would be futile and superficial, without a rational justification. This is the rational approach. The fathers of America applied this approach, and all the english world and segregationists as well. You had to prove you was a european 100%, not absolute 100%. An european 100% is a guy with all his roots in Europe, as long as you can know. The absolute 100% deals with everything that happened, even before Europe, since the last ice age. Even some proeminent Reich figures would probably be eliminated by such a system.
Now lets go to the dogmatic approach, the absolute 100%, which would be like in Christian Identity, where a person would have to be perfectly untainted since the last ice age at least. If we would go on this direction, however, we would find our selves with a huge, not to say impossible task, and if possible, we would be in a dilemma of killing or sending off extremaly productive, beautiful, intelligent and honorable people that we would never slightly suspect of. It would happen because we would have a 100% european population, and the testing would serve to search in the bottom of the box anything wrong from the ice age, hundreds of years of immigration from India to all of Europe and north africa, plus the indigenous populations in europe and north africa, etc, etc.
So the european 100% is the only realistic system actually. It takes human quality into account, and has a strong eugenics approach. In this system you can't have any admixtures of indian, black or asian, in each ones known history. The absolute 100% is rigid and totally disregards human quality, people start getting paranoid and eventually you start catching lots of european people. Critical areas are Russia, Finland, all of the Mediterranean and the areas of old Yuguslavia, Hungary and Bulgary. It won't ever be doable on earth, and if we managed to do it, we would have made more harm to ourselves than the jews had, lol. I support the european 100%. I must see a person who is white in looks, mind and spirit. All his/her immediate family members have to be normally white. And he/she must be willing to sacrifice for the race. If all these requirements are met, I'm okay with such person, that is enough for me, I won't go paranoid anymore about this matter. I used the absolute 100% in the past, and I got paranoid about everyone I met including me, as you remember. You start analyzing a people's traits, coupled with heritage, and imagining lots of theories... that is pointless. Using the absolute standard, you would have things happening like 15-20% america being sent off, large portions of Canada, half Europe, etc.
And I don't believe in the holiness of white people and much less of mankind. I don't care if a person is perfectly 101% white, that is like praising a lion merely because he looks like a lion, stupid. I don't care for the white thing, I care for the Aryan thing, meaning, a person needs to be white AND willing to sacrifice, willing to give his best energies, years and nerves to the betterment of our race. Otherwise, he belongs to the mindless masses, and I'm starting to hate the masses, lol. Only if someone is Aryan, in the true sense of the word, then I believe there is holiness attached to him, and he's a special creation.
CI does not teach that white people are holy of themselves, CI teaches that true Israelites fear God.
...and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.