Israel elect and Adamic man

[Arabel]

Thanks for clearing that up for me. And trust me, I'm rooting for them to all get destroyed too. I cant even stand the site of Asian people either.

[Staropramen]

I've actually wondered this myself, Because their are a lot of black Christians. I alway's wondered what the outcome would be for a murdering, Thieving, ghetto Black person as opposed to the Christian Black person. I mean do they really suffer the same consequence. Wesley Swift was asked this question but gave kind of a mixed answer.

I've never met a black christian. I have encountered blacks that go to churches and go along with judeochristianity but can you blame them? They don't worship the Jesus of the bible who, for example ignored the black woman of Matthew 15:22 and only granted her request after she acknowledged that she was a beast. How many church niggers have you met that acknowledge that they are a lower life form? Wesley Swift taught that the niggers came from outer space with the fall of Lucifer. He cites ancient Sumerian[?] texts that speak of the "dark and curly headed ones" that came from space as well as African folklore of similar thought. Regarding the differences between Tyrone the rapist and the church nigger are either truly to blame for what they do? I think not. The rapist nigger rapes humans because the white man allows niggers in his midst. He's an animal only doing what animals do. The heightened level of savagery that is the result of how jewry has manipulated his brain is also the white man's fault for allowing kikes in our midst. Wesley Swift taught that there will be a restoration of all things. If that is true for blacks than that will be in the future after they have spent some time in the Shekinah Glory [Lake of fire] and have been brought into proper adjustment with God. This is not our concern today and sending any nigger packing for another dimension where they can no longer infect humanity is morally acceptable.

[Fenwick]

I saw a street preacher in town a while back, an old white guy, speaking out of a microphone. I listened to him but i still didn't have a clue what church he was from. The gist of his speech was that God loves us, Jesus died for us, and also that God hates us and wants us to go to hell. This took about 20 minutes for him to say.


Standing behind him all the while was a negro with a negro child in its arms. At the end of the speech, the negro took the microphone and began warbling some unintelligible song. The owner of the coffee shop came out and asked them to stop, their christianity was scaring the customers.


I don't think the negroes are some magic demons with any spiritual future. God tells us "you alone have I known". Death for the nonelect is just that. They're all either mundane beasts or blasphemous hybrids.

[wmfinck]

The grafting of the wild olive branches is taken out of context even by many Identity Christians. First, Paul was writing to Romans, not to anyone who happened to read the epistle. Second, his message to the Romans was different in this respect than to anyone else he had written to. For instance, Paul told the Corinthians that their fathers had been baptized in the clouds and the sea. Paul told the Galatians that the law had been their tutor for Christ. In all three events, Paul was talking to dispersed "lost" Israelites. Yet to understand the differences in his messages to them, one must understand the ancient history of all three peoples. That the message of Paul and the history of the peoples correlates so well validates both Paul's ministry and Christian Identity beliefs.

The Galatians were Israelites descended from those of the Assyrian deportations. The law was certainly their tutor, since its precepts would have been handed down through history in their tribal practices, even if over the centuries their identity as Israelites lapsed from their consciences.

The Corinthians were Dorian Greeks. Their ancestors left Dor in the ancient land of Manasseh and migrated into the Peloponnese circa 1100 BC. Being Israelites, their ancestors certainly were with Moses in the Exodus.

The Romans were descended from the Trojans. Their ancestors left the main body of Israelites in Egypt before the Exodus. They never had the laws handed down at Sinai. Therefore they were Israelites, but they were wild olives, as opposed to cultivated olives.

Men can guess at Romans 11 all they want, but this interpretation, I would insist, is the only true interpretation. All other interpretations are merely stabs in the darkness. I think I added it to the end of my Trojan-Roman Judah podcast, and if not, then I should have.

If you don't your history, the Bible will always be a mystery.

Hope this helps!

[Filidh]

James,

Type into youtube the following terms:
"welcome to croatia"
"werde unsterblich"
"die demokraten bringen uns den volkstod"
"heroes of roa"
"werde aktiv"
"pastors judenrepublik npd"
"lindgrenn"
"truthwillout1001"
"nationaler sozialismus"
"volkstod"
"jobbik kampanyfilm 2010" (or just 'jobbik')
"autonomous nationalists"
"autonome nationalisten"
"kosovo is serbia"
"junge nationaldemokraten"
"tag der deutschen zukunft"
"dresden 2012" (or whichever year you wanna see a march of)

and so on.