"I'm A Pedophile, Not A Monster"
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2016 10:33 amby brucebohn
Re: "I'm A Pedophile, Not A Monster"
Posted:
Sun May 22, 2016 12:38 pmby EzraLB
If the shoe fits...
Monster (n.)
Early 14c., "malformed animal or human, creature afflicted with a birth defect," from Old French monstre, mostre "monster, monstrosity" (12c.), and directly from Latin monstrum "divine omen, portent, sign; abnormal shape; monster, monstrosity," figuratively "repulsive character, object of dread, awful deed, abomination," from root of monere "warn" (see monitor (n.)). Abnormal or prodigious animals were regarded as signs or omens of impending evil. Extended by late 14c. to imaginary animals composed of parts of creatures (centaur, griffin, etc.). Meaning "animal of vast size" is from 1520s; sense of "person of inhuman cruelty or wickedness" is from 1550s. As an adjective, "of extraordinary size," from 1837. In Old English, the monster Grendel was an aglæca, a word related to aglæc "calamity, terror, distress, oppression."
Re: "I'm A Pedophile, Not A Monster"
Posted:
Mon May 23, 2016 9:29 amby wmfinck
Most of the reporting on paedophiles in high places has been relegated to alternative and "conspiracy" websites. It rarely breaks into mainstream media, from what little I see of the MSM. How long can they keep it contained? This story just ran yesterday in Australia:
Hollywood’s evil secret: pedophiliaAnd early this morning in Newser:
http://www.newser.com/story/225506/elijah-wood-hollywood-is-hiding-pedophile-scandal.htmlHow long will the major networks ignore this? Oh, the paedophiles are their bosses...