forum.christogenea.org

Pretty much.

But try sharing this with your average white American and they'll deny it, proudly pointing out their family members who fought for 'freedom' and 'democracy' in WWII against the 'evil' Nazis.

Watching the news at this time of year is hilarious.


"Look at all the brave soldiers who fought against the evil Nazis, they fought to keep our country free, they gave us freedom, they kept us free from being invaded...."


"In other news, thousands of arab child molesters continue to swarm into this seaside resort...."

What is the difference between NS diversity and babylonian diversity?

(This is an image WN use)

Joe wrote:What is the difference between NS diversity and babylonian diversity?

If you read Mein Kampf, the difference is borders. But you are correct, that a sort of egalitarianism in the supposed right of other "peoples" to exist in their own countries was presumed, even by Hitler.

I won't argue with that Bill, however I want to clarify my angle.

In-line with Staropramen's idea:

We are supposed to trust Yahweh and be a separate people but WNs would rather gather together all the non-whites against the jews!

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=8107&p=23997&hilit=duke#p2399

Ultimately, I believe this is why God allowed NS Germany to fail. Sadly, they too were victims of centuries of bad theology - that of universalism. We cannot make civic or military covenants, agreements, etc. with non-Israel people, no matter how much it might be to our own advantage.

MichaelAllen wrote:Ultimately, I believe this is why God allowed NS Germany to fail. Sadly, they too were victims of centuries of bad theology - that of universalism. We cannot make civic or military covenants, agreements, etc. with non-Israel people, no matter how much it might be to our own advantage.

Foreign relations were expressed biblically by Presidents Washington and Jefferson who said we should have peaceful and honest commerce among nations, but we are to avoid any and all entangling alliances, never acquiescing to foreign influence. "Thou shall make no covenant with them [non-Israelites], nor with their gods. They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against Me" Ex. 23:32-33. And if the stranger is in our land, "Ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves" Ex. 34:13. "And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt not make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them. Neither shalt thou make marriages with them" Deut. 7:2-3.

Mark

Joe wrote:What is the difference between NS diversity and babylonian diversity?

As repugnant as diversity is, I think it's a stretch to suggest that National Socialism was Babylonian. Babylon is the opposite of the Kingdom of God. Germany had a spiritual awakening that given the amount of time they had to prosper spiritually, was phenomenal. Had they not been ganged upon by the real Babylonians, they would have had the luxury of time to figure it out. A more poignant question might be: what was the difference between German logistics and jewish tactics? It's easy to armchair quarterback WWII, but what to do when the world is opposed to your existence? Roll over and play dead? It's not that I'm giving Germany a free pass, they most certainly failed to tear down the Baals within her own borders, as do we and therefore will suffer the same fate and perhaps worse for embracing diversity. Well, we already are right?

Mark

Very true, thanks Mark.

But WN today do have an advantage that NS Germany didn't, and it is so-called neo-nazis who I think are falling short. I also think they are misrepresenting NS by doing this, even if NS did have similar views (in very different circumstances). They should be prepared to rectify that error.

After posting this I realized that I had made a mistake in saying 'NS diversity' rather than 'WN diversity'. The point I am making is not unfamiliar to anyone on this forum, I usually call it 'mongrel nationalism' and Staro has called it 'grey nationalism'. It is an idea that I think both Staro and I developed from Bill. This is an area I like to hammer on for propaganda purposes.

'Borders' is certainly a difference that I will accept from WN, but ultimately I still think WN is about finding a place for whites in babylon. And then there is the problem of establishing those borders with the sheep on one side and the goats on the other, ultimately Christ will set the borders between life and death.