forum.christogenea.org

G'day fellow Israelites I have heard a few times now within white nationalism that swearing is a niggerish form of communication. I dont exactly know if they mean that they condemn all use of dirty 4 letter words as I suppose in some circumstances it is necessary for expression however they do make a good point when they say white people use those words very casually and I can see how it is a niggerised form of behavior.
I would love some input and even the older generation can answer regarding how white folk used to communicate back in a better era. Thankyou.

depends on what is "swearing" ?
I read that word "dung" in the Bible is exactly the same as "shit" in these modern days, which is pretty mild.

The "F" word should never be used in the presence of your elders, as well as other sexual / vulgar terms.
If they are "worldly", then you will know how far you can loose your tongue, but beware, it might be a test.
for example,
Employers used to offer cigarettes or alcoholic drinks to potential employees at interviews to weed out who were the " bad ones".

Personally, I have ALWAYS felt offended and weirded out , especially when Anglo-looking actors say what I consider blasphemous , yelling "Jesus!" or "Christ!" when angry or shocked in a movie, , when not needed.

To me, it seems forced, because NOBODY AROUND ME in Toronto in the 1970s-2000s ever said that out loud when I grew up. This seems to be a Hollywood /Jewish thing.
if anybody on the forum ever heard this,. spoken out loud in person, when growing up, I am very curious.

I think lying is worse than swearing, this can be shown in the Bible. Don't swear in front of women who deserve to be respected as women (not feminist). This is according to tradition, but I think it is good.

I just remembered,sort of triggered by the last post by Joe.
It is not about using foul language, but swearing oaths

Matthew 5:34
But I say unto you, swear not at all: neither by Heaven, for it is God’s throne;

If you are ever taken into court,
do not put your hand on the Holy Bible and "swear to God to tell the truth".
You have the right to tell them and say, "I wish to affirm"., which they will tell you weighs the same as if you swore.
(yeah right).

Generally, from my observation, intelligent Whites tend to swear with a purpose while niggers swear indiscriminately as a matter of course out of a simple inability to intelligently use the language.

And niggers have been given the green light to use that type of language from jews, who, historically, have been known to be rude and crass. It was probably the jew "comic", Lenny Bruce, who brought pointless obscenity into popular culture. As with guns, niggers have ruined the pointed use of "bad words" for the rest of us.

In his discussion on Ephesians, Bill addressed the issue of "bad words" using Paul's words as a reference point:

29 You must not let any corrupt word go out of your mouth, but if anything good is of use for building, that would give delight to those listening.

Bill explains,

"The corrupt words to which Paul refers are not simply words which we do not like, which may by some be considered to be bad words or words which are imagined to be dirty or unseemly. A word is a tool used to express an idea, and the word itself cannot be good or bad. Rather, it is the constructed thoughts which the words are employed to represent which may be good or bad. But a particular word may be acceptable in one context, and if the same word is used in another context, the thought it represents is unacceptable. AND IF Here Paul is not speaking of merely bad words, but rather he is speaking of lying and falsehood, which is the context of this chapter. Therefore it is these things which are corrupt communications."

For the full explanation of this issue of "naughty" or "ribald" language, you'll find it in the podcast, The Epistles of Paul - Ephesians, Part 5: Speaking The Truth With Love...

http://christogenea.org/podcasts/pauls- ... truth-love

Generally, from my observation, intelligent Whites tend to swear with a purpose while niggers swear indiscriminately as a matter of course out of a simple inability to intelligently use the language.

Concerning swearing oaths and more generally abstract thinking and beasts:
https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

That's obviously another good reason for having nothing to do with non-Whites! Unfortunately, modern men have become completely dis-educated thanks to the jews and their lies...

Generally, yes. We should refrain from swearing as much as possible. But often enough I just cant help it, there's just so much to swear about these days.

[quote="bahr"]Concerning swearing oaths and more generally abstract thinking and beasts:
https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/[quote]

I've read this essay before, and while it is true that africans surely do not have the capacity of abstract thought, I don't believe this is the true reason why africans do not share our understanding of ethics and morality.

To illustrate that fallacy all we need to do is look at jewish behavior. Jews certainly are capable of abstract thought; however, whatever internal "moral" compass they may have does not function much differently from africans. With their seeming intelligence they are able to appear to behave morally, but in reality all they are doing is working around our White codes of conduct. And unlike niggers, they are clever enough to change what we consider moral behavior to allow for their immoral behavior to become normal and acceptable.

As the article points out about a particular nigger, "[H]is views may reflect a common understanding among blacks of what morality is: not something internalized but something others enforce from the outside."

Jews are no different, as they see our Christian morality, which is written in our hearts, as something enforced upon them from the outside, by the dominant White culture. Jewish "morality" is summed up in the Talmudic concept of, "Is it good for the jews?" or "Don't do it if it brings unwanted attention on the jewish community". Jews use whatever abilities they have in abstract thinking to work around any moral barrier that stands in their way of what they desire.

Jews are merely clever niggers, nothing more.

EzraLB wrote:Bill explains,

"The corrupt words to which Paul refers are not simply words which we do not like, which may by some be considered to be bad words or words which are imagined to be dirty or unseemly. A word is a tool used to express an idea, and the word itself cannot be good or bad. Rather, it is the constructed thoughts which the words are employed to represent which may be good or bad. But a particular word may be acceptable in one context, and if the same word is used in another context, the thought it represents is unacceptable. AND IF Here Paul is not speaking of merely bad words, but rather he is speaking of lying and falsehood, which is the context of this chapter. Therefore it is these things which are corrupt communications."

For the full explanation of this issue of "naughty" or "ribald" language, you'll find it in the podcast, The Epistles of Paul - Ephesians, Part 5: Speaking The Truth With Love...

http://christogenea.org/podcasts/pauls- ... truth-love

Wow, I made another boo-boo, LOL

Where the "AND IF" appears in all caps in that paragraph, it should have been removed before I posted the paper. Sorry!!! I am glad EzraLB quoted this, because I just spotted the error here.

Actually, while presenting a podcast, I often add thoughts in that were not in the original notes. So, sometimes, on the fly I type something in to remind me to go add the thought to the paper after I am done with the program. Occasionally I miss one of these when I edit the notes, and this was one of those occasions. Especially when I am talking in the chat server while editing.

Now, of course, I do not remember what I said, but maybe later I will check the audio and fix the page again.

EzraLB wrote:

bahr wrote:Concerning swearing oaths and more generally abstract thinking and beasts:
https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

I've read this essay before, and while it is true that africans surely do not have the capacity of abstract thought, I don't believe this is the true reason why africans do not share our understanding of ethics and morality.

To illustrate that fallacy all we need to do is look at jewish behavior. Jews certainly are capable of abstract thought; however, whatever internal "moral" compass they may have does not function much differently from africans. With their seeming intelligence they are able to appear to behave morally, but in reality all they are doing is working around our White codes of conduct. And unlike niggers, they are clever enough to change what we consider moral behavior to allow for their immoral behavior to become normal and acceptable.

As the article points out about a particular nigger, "[H]is views may reflect a common understanding among blacks of what morality is: not something internalized but something others enforce from the outside."

Jews are no different, as they see our Christian morality, which is written in our hearts, as something enforced upon them from the outside, by the dominant White culture. Jewish "morality" is summed up in the Talmudic concept of, "Is it good for the jews?" or "Don't do it if it brings unwanted attention on the jewish community". Jews use whatever abilities they have in abstract thinking to work around any moral barrier that stands in their way of what they desire.

Jews are merely clever niggers, nothing more.

Wow, I just wrote about this topic for tonight's program, but not so verbosely.

There must be a reason why White, Right and Light all rhyme, LOL
The point I made is that there is no morality without racial integrity, for much the same reasons.