forum.christogenea.org

In regards to the jesuits and their jewish roots to offset the protestant reformation, I am also aware the extreme jesuit oath contains an anti jew stance. I was wondering if anyone could explain why this is the case when clearly there is a jewish control of the jesuits. Thankyou.

IMHO, and from what I have read in sources such as Luther, the converso-jews are the most extreme of the anti-jews in rhetoric, while at the same time they pollute Christianity with jewish ideals.

The Jesuits were Christians-in-name-only who sought to destroy all that would not bow to their god the pope. That way they could control all.

So converso-jews are all about labels and appearance, and nothing about Love and Christian substance.

disciplemate wrote:In regards to the jesuits and their jewish roots to offset the protestant reformation, I am also aware the extreme jesuit oath contains an anti jew stance. I was wondering if anyone could explain why this is the case when clearly there is a jewish control of the jesuits. Thankyou.

Marxist dialectics controls the thesis and antithesis, thereby controlling the end product (synthesis). That really puts the mystery in Mystery Babylon, a consortium of jews, catholics and judeo-Christians.

Mark

Good answers to those questions. I just wonder now if the Jesuits are an institution to still be reckoned with as they were around the protestant reformation?
My thoughts are that the jesuits have accomplished their plans by maintaining catholic strength as well as infiltrating protestant churches to turn them over to judeo and zionist values. But does that go as far as their intended plans? Or are the jesuits essentially complete in their mission? Obviously the Pope is a jesuit, so I wonder if there is any significance there?