This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.

More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Discussions about anything whatsoever.

More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby SwordBrethren » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:29 pm

A German "princess" got drunk, stripped naked, ranted about killing Muslims [which makes her OH SO ATTRACTIVE to the SF posters], and then assaulted several medical technicians [head-butting one]... YEAH, this is the sort of behavior that makes for a great wife... *sigh*


Then the inevitable posting by fools who talk about how "hot" jewess Kate Middleton is. Middleton's jewish ancestry is already well-documented.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1049427/



Only recently did we reach such a low point that some men amongst our people actually will give the time of day to a woman who behaves in such an absurd fashion.

Can anybody imagine a German princess staggering around drunk, naked, and ranting about killing Muslims, and then assaulting a police officer or a medical technician in 1905 Berlin? She would be disgraced and probably disowned by her family. She wouldn't have suitors lined up around the block.


Feminism basically teaches that women should be free to do whatever they want as long as it provides "fulfillment" for the woman in question. Male approval for a female's drunken outburst is a form of feminism.
Revelation 18:
Und ich hörte eine andere Stimme vom Himmel, die sprach: Gehet aus von ihr, mein Volk, daß ihr nicht teilhaftig werdet ihrer Sünden, auf daß ihr nicht empfanget etwas von ihren Plagen!

Denn ihre Sünden reichen bis in den Himmel, und Gott denkt an ihren Frevel.


Judentum ist Verbrechertum!

Heute ist Deutschland die größte Weltmacht! - Der Führer 30 Januar 1940
User avatar
SwordBrethren
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:58 pm

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Nayto » Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:55 am

Stormfront's lack of understanding of gender roles never ceases to amaze me. It blows my mind that they can't understand these basic things.

Once again it's testament to the fact that Stormfront can't be taken seriously. Just a distraction...
Nayto
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:06 am

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Fenwick » Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:56 pm

They have this libertarian outlook of leaving everything to the individual choice, and merely trying to influence that choice through propaganda. Alcoholism and loutishness are scarcely even seen as vices, as if they were lifestyle choices or hobbies.

I'll never forget how dumbfounded they were when I suggested miscegenation ought to be illegal. It seemed like some of the women on SF did not like the idea of men restricting their sexual choices, which would surely only be a restriction if you were planning on racemixing beforehand. Some of the men aren't much better, as we see from Dan Johns with his "you live your way and I live mine". There is but one Way, and God is not a libertarian.
User avatar
Fenwick
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:21 am

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Staropramen » Thu Jul 03, 2014 12:37 am

Recently I got very drunk and did some very stupid things that I'm not proud of. As a result I have given up drinking alcohol entirely. I pray this German woman comes to the same conclusion.
"If God is a Jew then the only thing left for us to do is commit suicide"
-Dr. Wesley A. Swift
Historical Recordings of interest to Christians;
http://historicalrecordings.net/
User avatar
Staropramen
 
Posts: 2026
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:58 pm

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Lang » Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:44 am

Feminism is the attempt of women to be like men. As they can't be, we end up having men on one side, and inferior men on another. The slightest insinuation that a woman can't do a certain thing men do, and they bring apocalipse in earth. Ironically, almost everyone there will say a man can't dress like women, act like queers, etc, they will say how men got emasculated and how its a jewish trap, but at the same time they freak out if you say a woman can't have male behavior and adopt masculine traits. Everyone seeing a man gossiping to a woman, crying watching silly novellas, choosing to cook and clean instead of playing football or some martial arts, starting getting too sensible, etc, will say he is degenerated and need to grow some balls, because its female traits and he's a man. Now, being agressive, pursuing a career, dominating the household, etc, will be forever male traits, but we don't see people telling women they can't do this because they are woman, and its not feminine to do such things.

The problem with Stormfront is that in an attemp to attract women at all costs, they lowered all their standards regarding feminism. Its such a bad logic. Why a political movement need women? Hitler was lowering the party standards to attract women? Once you have won, women will come. Gender diversity will not bring any better chances of success. The women who choose to join for option are more advanced than the others of their gender, as long as she is not there to be courted or bring feminism. But lowering all the standards to attract women is as stupid as a liberal saying the police force needs more women.

Most people there thing the struggle for our race is merely defeating multiculturalism. I spent more than a month talking to a hardcore feminist there, trying to teach her, and eventually I gave up. She was by far the stupidiest person Ive ever talked to. Hell, I knew niggers that were smarter than her. She had no idea about what a white nationalist movement really is, knew nothing about the III Reich, hadnt read any books about any pro white author. All she knew is she didn't like blacks, and "men can't opress women".

In fact, just like some hardcore Jesus freaks can't be converted because their loyalty is forever with the church, not with the race, 80% of women there have their loyalties with "liberation of women" logics, not with the race. And just like one can't follow the church and the race at the same time, they also can't follow liberation of women and their race at the same time, one is the opposite of the other.

I even dare to say, women pursuing careers instead of family, and this brainwashed "Im not your slave" complex is a bigger problem than race-mixing propaganda and immigration.
Last edited by Lang on Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:56 am, edited 3 times in total.
"Give a hammer to a white, and he will build civilization;
Give a hammer to an asian, and he will build other hammers;
Give a hammer to an arab, and he will kill his wife;
Give a hammer to a nigger, and he will kill whites;
Give a hammer to a jew, and he will sell it to niggers.
"

J.M.
User avatar
Lang
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:30 pm
Location: Southern Brazil

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Lang » Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:46 am

This is the best article Ive ever read regarding the problem. I will share it with you:

The Woman Question in White Nationalism

by Greg Johnson

The perennial question is back: Why are there so few women in the White Nationalist movement?

Before venturing an analysis of this question, I need to say a few words about what White Nationalism is. White Nationalism is about preserving the biological integrity of the white race by making our race’s survival and flourishing the number one political priority. White Nationalists represent the genetic interests of all whites, men and women, adults and children.

But preserving our race’s biological integrity requires more than defeating multiculturalism and multiracialism. It also requires the defeat of feminism and emasculation (male infantilization) and the restoration of sexual roles that are not just traditional but also biological: men as protectors and providers, women as nurturers.

These sex roles are norms, meaning ideals. Realistically, not every man or woman will be able to function according to these norms. (That’s what makes them ideals!) But a White Nationalist society needs to maintain these ideals as norms nevertheless, for even in a racially homogeneous society like Japan, feminism and male infantilization are causes of personal and social misery and below-replacement birthrates, particularly among the educated and intelligent who should be reproducing more rather than less.

Many men who genuinely wish to become husbands and fathers shy away from marriage because every man knows another man who has been emotionally and financially savaged by the punitive feminist biases now codified in laws governing marriage, divorce, and child custody. White Nationalists will change that.

Many women who genuinely wish to become wives and mothers nevertheless feel forced to pursue a career first because of a lack of men who wish to assume the protector and provider role. They want a Prince Charming, but all they see are Peter Pans. White Nationalists will change that as well.

The restoration of traditional and biological sexual norms will affect men as well as women. Indeed, it will be harder for men than for women. In a White Nationalist society, men will no longer be allowed to prolong their adolescence into their thirties and forties. They will be expected, encouraged, and enabled to take on adult responsibilities as soon as they are able. They will become husbands and fathers, providers and protectors for their families. White Nationalism will demand that men “man up” so women do not have to.

White Nationalism promises women a society in which they are free from the fear of the black and brown predators who commit the overwhelming majority of rapes. Nobody will stop women who wish to remain single and childless to pursue their careers. But the overwhelming majority of women who wish to marry and raise families will be able to find husbands who can support them and their children in stable, monogamous marriages. No matter what their income, they will be able to live in safe, homogeneously white neighborhoods. No matter what their income, they will be able to send their children to safe, homogeneously white schools. In a White Nationalist society, no mother will need to fear that her children’s livelihoods will be lost because of affirmative action, non-white immigration, or shipping jobs overseas. In a White Nationalist society, no mother need fear that her children will die on battlefields to serve the interests of other races. In short, White Nationalism has a great deal to offer to women.

So again, why are there so few women in the White Nationalist movement?

My answer is simple: Most women see politics as a largely masculine enterprise. They are correct in this. Thus women are waiting for men to build a White Nationalist movement that credibly advances the interests of our race. When we accomplish that, the women will come, and they have an important role to play as natural networkers, nurturers, and multi-taskers.

So White Nationalist men need to focus first and foremost on advancing our cause: building community and raising consciousness, honing our message and developing new ways of communicating it, organizing to pursue aims in the social and political realms. If we take care of those things, the woman question will take care of itself.

As for the few women who are already in our cause: that is to their credit. They are in the vanguard of their sex as well as the vanguard of our race.

The last thing the movement should do is soften our message or compromise the pursuit of our ultimate aims simply in order to court women.

First of all, we have to ask: Is the lack of women in the movement even a problem? Yes, of course, we need all the people and resources we can get. But is the existence of overwhelmingly or exclusively male groups by its very nature a problem? Yes, by all means, let’s bring women into the movement. But does that mean that all groups need to be open to women or have “gender parity”? Is our struggle against racial diversity strengthened by sexual diversity? Are we feminists, then? Are we nuts?

Michael Walker’s otherwise excellent speech at the 2008 American Renaissance conference was marred by his claim that he would like to see every other seat filled with a woman. That would, of course, be excellent advice if we were a ballroom dancing society. But it was not so long ago that politics was an exclusively male thing. Armies and police and fire departments were also exclusively male. Were these organizations less able to look out for the interests of women when they were exclusively male?

The truth is that sexual diversity in an organizational context, like racial diversity in all contexts, is often a source of division, conflict, and weakness – particularly if the organization is involved in something quintessentially male like fighting and self-sacrifice for the common good. Thus all-male police and fire departments were probably more effective at protecting the interests of women than today’s integrated forces.

We have to ask ourselves if this might not also be true of some White Nationalist organizations. And might some White Nationalist groups be more effective if they were all female? See Amanda Bradley’s excellent review of Women of the Far Right, which deals largely with women-only organizations. We need a lot more of such groups.

If sexual diversity is a source of weakness for all other political movements, shouldn’t White Nationalists – who can’t afford to pass up any tiny advantage – be eager to experiment with sexually homogeneous organizations? If our enemies are slowing themselves down by tying themselves to women in three-legged races, why should we be eager to adopt their handicaps instead of sprinting unencumbered for the finish line?

I am all for pluralism. White Nationalists need to recruit the full diversity of whites in order to reach the full diversity of whites. We need to have people from all different groups and walks of life adapting and delivering our message. We need a whole range of different organizations and strategies. Some of those organizations might be exclusively male. Others might be exclusively female. Still others will be mixed. But there is no apriori reason to think that something is wrong if a White Nationalist group or the movement as a whole does not have a 50/50 male/female ratio.

The main reason why men want more women at White Nationalist meetings is they wish to find ideologically compatible mates. But as our community grows we will be able to separate political gatherings from purely social ones, and some of those political organizations might function better by being sexually segregated. (Every normal society tends organically toward having at least some sexually segregated organizations.)

The White Nationalist community is often characterized as “misogynist.” Many White Nationalists are so afraid of that label that they will actually censor, shun, and betray other White Nationalists who are accused of misogyny. Just how cowardly and contemptible this is should be obvious.

“Hate” is the stock accusation of the enemy. Even if you offer up the most sober, scientific accounts of racial differences, you will be labeled a race hater. Oppose multiculturalism and you are a race hater. Offer up the same sort of accounts of sexual differences and you will be called a woman hater. Oppose feminism and emasculation and you are a woman hater.

The enemy controls the media and status system in this society. Of course they are going to use harsh words to stigmatize us. And that is just for starters. But if someone is able to stand up to the first accusation, he should be able to stand up to the second. The inability to do so strikes me as the sign of scandalous intellectual confusion and moral weakness.

That said, just as there are White Nationalists who are race haters by any reasonable definition of the term, there are genuine woman haters. They are not found everywhere, but they have their bastions. They are not the majority, but they are a sizable and vocal enough minority that the movement as a whole has been characterized as misogynist. (There are also passionate man-haters, but like women in general, they are few in number.)

But why the intense mutual hatred between the sexes? Such hatred is not natural and healthy. It is the product of a sick social order.

White Nationalists hold that racial hatred is an inevitable result of breaking down racial boundaries and introducing racial competition within the same realms. Diversity and integration are not cures for racial hatred, they are causes of it.

Hatred between the sexes is also a product of the breakdown of natural and traditional sexual roles and competition within the same realms. Feminism has brought women into formerly male bastions, creating enormous resentment from men. Feminism and its corollary, male infantilization, have caused untold conflict and suffering for both sexes. Feminism in the legal system has made life hell for countless divorced husbands and fathers. Feminism is not a cure for misogyny, it is a cause of it.

So what do we do about misogynists in our ranks? I vote we do nothing. In the appropriate venues, we need to let their voices be heard, in spite of frequent crudity and excesses. Also, remember: much of what is stigmatized as misogyny is simply salutary “sex realism” and the absolutely necessary project of restoring traditional/biological sex roles.

White men are the victims of a pincer movement. We are victimized as whites and as men. How can our movement claim any moral credibility and leadership if we demand that our racial brothers who are often in extreme pain be censored, whether the motives be feminism or misplaced conservative chivalry?

I understand that this sort of atmosphere makes female vanguardists uncomfortable, but I will simply ask you, as a personal sacrifice to the greater good, to be tolerant and understanding. Honest communication even about unpleasant things is one of the things that sets our movement apart. And cultivating this kind of openness is absolutely necessary if we are to establish an intellectually sound vision of society and a strategically and tactically sound path of achieving it.

One false explanation for why there are so few women in the movement is the presence of weird men: curmudgeons, cranks, nerds, people who have been locked in mental institutions, and so forth. This would, of course, explain the relative absence of normal women. But there are plenty of weird women out there. And the reason they are not White Nationalists is that they are waiting for their weird male counterparts to make some progress before they will hop on board. In that, at least, they are perfectly normal.

Savitri Devi once said that she could never love a man who loved her more than he loved his ideals. What makes a man worthy of respect is his ability to look above himself and his personal interests to serve the common good. This is what Evola called Uranian masculinity. The best women respect that. They are right to despise a man who compromises his principles in order to court their favor.

The same principle applies to our movement. Women will become White Nationalism’s most fanatical and devoted supporters once we demonstrate that we are truly able to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. If we neglect that end, soften our message, and split our camp with needless witch-hunts and finger-pointing, all in the name of catering to the ignorant and foolish, the best women will hold us in well-deserved contempt as we listen to the sirens singing our race to its doom.
"Give a hammer to a white, and he will build civilization;
Give a hammer to an asian, and he will build other hammers;
Give a hammer to an arab, and he will kill his wife;
Give a hammer to a nigger, and he will kill whites;
Give a hammer to a jew, and he will sell it to niggers.
"

J.M.
User avatar
Lang
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:30 pm
Location: Southern Brazil

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby Joe » Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:17 am

From Lang's post.
The restoration of traditional and biological sexual norms will affect men as well as women. Indeed, it will be harder for men than for women. In a White Nationalist society, men will no longer be allowed to prolong their adolescence into their thirties and forties. They will be expected, encouraged, and enabled to take on adult responsibilities as soon as they are able. They will become husbands and fathers, providers and protectors for their families. White Nationalism will demand that men “man up” so women do not have to.


Yep, they all want to worship superman and watch T.V and look at women in bikinis and watch sports while drinking beer. Teenagers. Lang said similar things but this was well articulated.

Adam was not deceived. Adam compromised. Men go along with it because they are not thinking with their heads.

If you do that, she will never fear you (Ephesians 5:33); and then how can you love her. How can God love those who do not fear Him, I am not equating man with God, just using the example given to us in the Holy Bible. You will never have anything good, just like all the others, giving in marriage without realizing it. It is better to discipline her and not worry about the outcome. If she repents... that is good. :lol:

Savitri Devi once said that she could never love a man who loved her more than he loved his ideals. What makes a man worthy of respect is his ability to look above himself and his personal interests to serve the common good. This is what Evola called Uranian masculinity. The best women respect that. They are right to despise a man who compromises his principles in order to court their favor.
...and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
User avatar
Joe
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 1:23 pm

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby SwordBrethren » Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:11 am

Lang wrote:This is the best article Ive ever read regarding the problem. I will share it with you:

The Woman Question in White Nationalism

by Greg Johnson

The perennial question is back: Why are there so few women in the White Nationalist movement?




There are so few women in White Nationalism because it is a marginalized movement comprised mostly of low-income nobodies who sit around and moan and groan that the Jews have kept them from living their dream, getting a job that pays decent money, etc. Women aren't attracted to me who have no power, no status, no influence, and very little in the way of resources, and who sit around blaming others [even if the others are to blame] for their setbacks and failures.

Okay, sure, yes, Jews and International finance capitalists are ruining the world and basically dominate the economies of the world, you can either capitulate and do nothing except sitting around bitching about it all day and let your life pass you by, or you can learn the rules of the system they have imposed and make something of your self by working within the system, gaming the system, or doing an end-run around the system. But you have to know the rules of the game/system before you do any of that... Or you can just sit in the trailer park, drink another beer, and talk about how you've accomplished something for the White race by getting another Nazi tattoo and how Hitler would be proud of the $3,000 you just spent to get a massive Swastika on your back.

People on SF are not only content to sit around and bitch while achieving nothing, they are dedicated to trying to pull down anybody who is trying to make something of himself, like how crabs will pull down any crab that is trying to climb out of the bucket.

I could go on Stormfront and find a thousand posts from several hundred different members all of them moaning and groaning about how the "jewish system" has kept them from becoming rich and how they are "certain" they could have become rich in a "real Aryan" system, or at least live comfortably, yet they harshly criticize people who are involved in medicine or law as being in "jew dominated fields" and they scoff at people who study engineering because "half of your co-workers will be Chinese or Indians" and they encourage young white men to shun college and become truck drivers, welders, lumberjacks [all respectable trades but trades that will never yield any influence, power, or status], and other jobs that will never pay more than $50,000 pear year. They also encourage White people to drop what they are doing and move to North Dakota for the illusory salary of $80,000 to $90,000 per year driving short-haul trucks or working in an oil field, or $15 per hour at McDonald's in western North Dakota, failing to mention that a studio apartment is about $2,000 per month, a one room rental in somebody's house is $1,200 per month, a gallon of milk is about $8 dollars, and it is basically what you would expect in a typical boom-town, sky-high prices and crime, so that $80,000 per year driving trucks evaporates pretty quickly when 30% goes for taxes and 60% goes for room/food/board/expenses.

In short, the people on Stormfront are largely losers who are not going anywhere in life, they have minimal skills, they detest higher education [you should see how they treat the few people on that site who openly admit to having a PhD], they have an answer for everything, in regards to why "that field" won't work. Medicine is a "Jewish field" the same as "Law" and when it comes to Computers/IT those fields are denounced as "too Asian." Instead of thinking of what they can do and why something is a good idea, they think up instant excuses for why something "won't work."

They are basically naysayers. So they wind up with menial blue collar jobs making $12 dollars an hour and then they wonder why they have trouble landing women and why they can only afford one or two kids. Just like with regular poor white trash in the real world it never ceases to amaze/amuse me that you can find plenty of people on SF crying about how poor they are and how they cannot afford to live in a better area, drive a better vehicle, or buy an AR-15, yet they will admit they have 10-15 tattoos [the more intricate/colored ones can easily run $1500+ dollars]. In short, they are people who are stuck with a mentality of poverty and a culture of poverty, they will spend their money on alcohol and tattoos and continue living a marginal existence without ever achieving or accomplishing anything of note.

National Socialism and Fascism were largely middle class and upper middle class movements, with most of the rank and file members being small business owners, urban professionals, land-owners, military officers, senior enlisted personnel, etc. This is all verifiable, you can look up information on the first several thousand members of the NSDAP and look up demographic information on their primary supporters throughout the 1920s and early 1930s, the same for Mussolini's party in Italy. National Socialism/fascism absolutely requires the mass involvement of the middle class. Essentially the middle classes in Germany and Italy saw their prospects and future opportunities being blocked by social democracy, liberal democracy, and the threat of communism, and they rallied to National Socialism and Fascism. Huge numbers of the Fascists in Italy were out of work engineers, out of work lawyers, professional people who would actually be going somewhere in life, etc, in short people who could easily have had better prospects if the leftists/liberal democrats were not wrecking Italy's economy.

I've seen some young males on SF post about how they are pursuing a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, and the inevitable deluge of criticism comes down upon them as 20-30 other guys pile on them to declare some variation of the theme "you are wasting your money" until the original poster explains he has a scholarship and a grant and it is not costing him anything, then the chorus switches to a theme of "you are wasting your time" and they go on to guarantee that he will be miserable working alongside Indians and Chinese. So I suppose he would be happier driving trucks and being away from home 27 days per month to make $40,000 dollars per year, as opposed to having a family and making $90,000 to $140,000 but having to work alongside several Indians and Chinese?

The simple truth is that most of the people on Stormfront lack the requisite intelligence, skills, abilities, discipline, and drive, to successfully study and practice medicine, law, engineering, computer science, and other similar high status fields. The entire movement in the Western world has morphed from a movement that in the 1920s-1930s was largely comprised of the middle class with ideology, doctrine, and leadership set by a professional/intellectual class, to a movement largely comprised of the lower class with an ideology set by the upper rungs of the lower class or the lower rungs of the middle class. The Klan in the 1920s was able to count amongst its members, lawyers, doctors, engineers, state legislators, several US Senators, several US representatives, at least one US President, and several Supreme Court justices, compare that with the Klan today and try not to laugh at the gaggle of Jerry Springer rejects that comprise the organization claiming descent from that once highly regarded fraternal brotherhood.


*Back to women*

When all you have to offer women is the truth and validity of a sincere conviction and a historically and spiritually validated/correct worldview, 99.8% of women are going to reject that because women are social creatures based around conformity and harmony, rather than right/wrong. Women will go along to get along and they are very much concerned with appearances and what their community thinks of them. This is largely why modern whorish/slut behavior would have been unthinkable in the 1950s even though it would have been legal, women could have gotten drunk and had lots of promiscuous sex in the 1950s, but it would have been socially devastating to their reputation and their marriage/career/life prospects. Today it is still legal, just as legal as it was in the 1950s, but virtually all social pressure to refrain from such conduct has been removed and replaced with social pressure to engage in such conduct, hence our society is an open cess-pit.


By and large the White movement today is comprised of losers, miscreants, misfits, and social rejects, people going nowhere in life who have limited earning power, no status, and no influence. Women don't wake up in the morning yearning to get involved in a movement of marginalized losers. Hitler's NSDAP was only able to gain the support of large numbers of women after they had tens of thousands of men and were actually earning some seats in the Reichstag, once he was able to get a measure of power and to show some status/success/influence, women were able to attach themselves to the NSDAP and vigorously support it. Women won't bet on the losing horse, even if the losing horse is telling the truth, because nobody [especially women] likes a loser, nobody [women in particular] wants to be on the losing side.

Win a handful of seats in a state legislature and you will see women coming to the movement. Women are attracted to success and will support a marginalized idea/movement if it shows signs of having a real chance at victory.

Win a free case of beer at the trailer park bar, well that's not exactly the sort of success women are attracted to...
Revelation 18:
Und ich hörte eine andere Stimme vom Himmel, die sprach: Gehet aus von ihr, mein Volk, daß ihr nicht teilhaftig werdet ihrer Sünden, auf daß ihr nicht empfanget etwas von ihren Plagen!

Denn ihre Sünden reichen bis in den Himmel, und Gott denkt an ihren Frevel.


Judentum ist Verbrechertum!

Heute ist Deutschland die größte Weltmacht! - Der Führer 30 Januar 1940
User avatar
SwordBrethren
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:58 pm

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby SwordBrethren » Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:22 am

Compare Stormfront with Identity, many of the people in CI are or were small business owners, many are or were professional workers, and many [if not most] were college educated or seriously self-taught in hardcore fields.

I have yet to encounter anybody on SF who is self-taught in anything meaningful.

Bill taught himself COIN Greek and programming, why can't people on SF teach themselves something useful that helps themselves personally/professionally and helps the cause?

Stormfront is overpopulated by poor trash who are content to remain mired in poverty because they embrace the culture of poverty as evidenced by their disdain for professional occupations, their nearly incessant class agitation against the upper classes, their promotion of tattoos [and other hallmarks of the lower classes], their acceptance of slutty and lower class behavior [as evidenced by their approval of a German so-called Princess stripping naked and attacking medical technicians, this is shameful low class trash behavior and only similarly situated low class trash could approve of it], and their overall hostility towards anybody who is above them in status.

They rage against that which they can never obtain.


There are a few small and medium sized business owners on Stormfront, there are a few lawyers and doctors on the site, but most of them keep it pretty quiet because [aside from the obvious reasons of protecting their career] they will be met with near universal condemnation from a movement comprised of poor trash dedicated to the pursuit of anti-intellectualism. I am convinced that if the SF movement were around during the Renaissance they would have killed Da Vinci [or at least ostracized him] because he is "busy painting and inventing in his ivory tower and he won't come down into the streets and fight."

They've been around 20 years, what tangible achievements have they made? Other than being useful for networking and picking out that person who is one out of one thousand who has some real potential and guiding them along to better sites, there is no real purpose for SF.
Revelation 18:
Und ich hörte eine andere Stimme vom Himmel, die sprach: Gehet aus von ihr, mein Volk, daß ihr nicht teilhaftig werdet ihrer Sünden, auf daß ihr nicht empfanget etwas von ihren Plagen!

Denn ihre Sünden reichen bis in den Himmel, und Gott denkt an ihren Frevel.


Judentum ist Verbrechertum!

Heute ist Deutschland die größte Weltmacht! - Der Führer 30 Januar 1940
User avatar
SwordBrethren
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:58 pm

Re: More Stormfront Feminism [From Male Posters]

Postby SwordBrethren » Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:54 pm

Another amateur historian at Stormfront who declares the Luftwaffe was not part of the Wehrmacht...


https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t10494 ... st12201162


Oh dear, someone didn't do their homework at the Daily Mail. Other than the man in the picture obviously being in the Luftwaffe and not the Wehrmacht, the man is likely Heinrich, Ludwig's brother.



It is embarrassing to be the one who is actually mistaken when declaring somebody else did not do their homework...




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wehrmacht

The Wehrmacht (German pronunciation: [ˈveːɐ̯maxt] ( listen) (Defence Force)—from German: wehren, to defend and Macht, power, force, cognate to English might) was the unified armed forces of Germany from 1935 to 1945. It consisted of the Heer (army), the Kriegsmarine (navy) and the Luftwaffe (air force).
Revelation 18:
Und ich hörte eine andere Stimme vom Himmel, die sprach: Gehet aus von ihr, mein Volk, daß ihr nicht teilhaftig werdet ihrer Sünden, auf daß ihr nicht empfanget etwas von ihren Plagen!

Denn ihre Sünden reichen bis in den Himmel, und Gott denkt an ihren Frevel.


Judentum ist Verbrechertum!

Heute ist Deutschland die größte Weltmacht! - Der Führer 30 Januar 1940
User avatar
SwordBrethren
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:58 pm

Next

Return to Miscellaneous Banter

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron