forum.christogenea.org

I would advise these folks to get a test done independent of the BBC.

In saying this though it is my opinion Nick Griffin has made a mess of any chances the right did have in Britain. Another example that there is no political solution. His so-called legal team advised that they had no option but to amend the BNP constitution so that it was not race specific, when in reality they were simply agreeing to be judged under admiralty law jurisdiction (statutes), when the highest law in Great Britain (and the Commonwealth territories that have a Governor-General in place) is the law contained within the Scriptures by virtue of the British Monarch's oath to uphold the Word of God and the Gospels....and as we know, the Scriptures are all about race.

It could have been an interesting case....That is, put the questions of interpretation of the ancient Greek before the Privy Council (not that we need any Privy Council to tell us what is correct or not), and watch them try and squirm out of that. Would certainly have got some publicity, even if the Privy Council would have come up with some spurious reason (in true Talmudic fashion) not to agree that the correct renderring of the Greek will not uphold universalism. At the very least the BNP could have argued that they had a common law right to associate with whom they wished, and were not subject to any lower admiralty law statute. As we know the Scriptures include the laws for elections, ie, to elect captians over 1000s, etc. The heirarchy of jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, and the Commonwealth territories of Australia, Canada, and NZ, is firstly the Scriptures, then the law of equity, then common law, then lastly statute.


However, the lesson for the BNP and anyone else that uses an Inns of Court sworn advocate, is that he/she/it will always drag your argument into the lower jurisdiction of admiralty law (Babylonian Law). That being the admiralty law of the City of London Corporation, as the Inns of Court is a subsidairy corporation of the City, and domiciled within the City, and the advocate is sworn to work FIRSTLY for the Inns of Court (and that includes all advocates in the USA as well).

This following comment by Nick Griffin in 2002 I think says it all about the man and the BNP:

"I think there is a closer correlation between the interests of our party and the Jewish people than there is between the Jews and the multi-culturalists creating the conditions for an Islamic Britain in the future."
Statement by Nick Griffin (London Jewish News, April 26th 2002)

This Audio alone debunks the video above.



These DNA ancestry tests are often spurious and will be for decades to come. They match to samples of contemporary populations and are then extrapolated to the past--regardless of what racial changes have occurred in the population sample historically.

To say that someone's DNA matches middle eastern means he could be part Arab, or, he could have DNA from a European that lived among the population and had DNA in the samples, or an arab who was part european could have given a matching sample. If a community of whites lives in the middle east and your DNA matched one of their samples the testing company would say you were part middle eastern. The English had colonies all over the world, which is the most likely explanation why these people matched middle eastern and asian populations. It really does not prove anything about their racial makeup, but rather the ineptitude of researchers who cannot properly separate DNA data by race.

A DNA test is not a guarantee of proving anything racially. Your eyes are more accurate than a test tube. Last names are often a dead giveaway. In fact, a lot of the testing companies push the idea that lots and lots of white Americans are part Indian or part negro, when they are not. There are self-hating white people running around all over who claim to be "part cherokee." This claim is especially popular in the northeast, where of course, the cherokee never lived.

DNA science is overrated, as they still cannot regularly predict what your hair or eye color will be before you are born from a DNA sample. And you expect these pseudo-scientists to truthfully tell that white woman she is part mud?

Save your $300 and buy a hunting rifle or something useful.

vv
http://vandal.christogenea.org

Save your $300 and buy a hunting rifle or something useful.

I couldn't have said it better myself Vandal!

With or without DNA testing I very much doubt that Nick Griffin could trace his ancestry back to his own dad !.