forum.christogenea.org

For anyone who is interested in a compelling argument for the authenticity of "The Protocols," I would highly recommend this short book, "The Jewish World Conspiracy: The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Before The Court In Berne," written by Karl Bergmeister in 1938.

Bergmeister presents compelling evidence that the Swiss court's decision that ruled the Protocols a "forgery" was fraudulent and had no legal basis. He also provides evidence of its original authorship and how it actually came into existence. It's written with prototypical German attention to detail and logic. A very compelling book on the subject.

https://ia800306.us.archive.org/12/item ... 938%29.pdf

Once you've read this book, you'll be able to answer any naysayer's charges as to its authenticity or its historical accuracy.

Wow, I am actually thinking about a Saturday series soon based upon a book written by a Russian and published in English in 1920 under the title The Protocols and World Revolution.

Thanks for this, perhaps it too will make for a good perspective.

And to add--Bergmeister addresses the oft-repeated claim that the Protocols were plagiarized from the fictional work, "Dialogue In Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu," by Maurice Joly, which can be read here:

http://www.notbored.org/dialogue-in-hell.html

As I mentioned to you before, Bill, there is no doubt that the Jewish author of the Protocols plagiarized, word for word in places, some of that work, to incorporate it into a much larger work. About the author of the Protocols, Bergmeister states:

"He committed an open plagiarism on Joly. This fact however cannot be taken as furnishing the least proof that the Protocols are an anti-Semitic forgery; for it is not a question of whether the text of the Protocols came into being partly through the misuse of the text of another book, but solely of whether the Protocols contain the programme of Jewish world domination, and were written by a Jew for the Jewish people. The fact that externally a plagiarism is at hand, is no proof that the contents are a forgery. The question of forgery would first arise when it could be proved that the Protocols had actually been composed by an Anti-Semite for the purpose of slandering Jewry."

Any show you do on the Protocols needs to address this issue--and put it to rest.