by EzraLB » Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:20 pm
And to add--Bergmeister addresses the oft-repeated claim that the Protocols were plagiarized from the fictional work, "Dialogue In Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu," by Maurice Joly, which can be read here:
http://www.notbored.org/dialogue-in-hell.htmlAs I mentioned to you before, Bill, there is no doubt that the Jewish author of the Protocols plagiarized, word for word in places, some of that work, to incorporate it into a much larger work. About the author of the Protocols, Bergmeister states:
"He committed an open plagiarism on Joly. This fact however cannot be taken as furnishing the least proof that the Protocols are an anti-Semitic forgery; for it is not a question of whether the text of the Protocols came into being partly through the misuse of the text of another book, but solely of whether the Protocols contain the programme of Jewish world domination, and were written by a Jew for the Jewish people. The fact that externally a plagiarism is at hand, is no proof that the contents are a forgery. The question of forgery would first arise when it could be proved that the Protocols had actually been composed by an Anti-Semite for the purpose of slandering Jewry."
Any show you do on the Protocols needs to address this issue--and put it to rest.
"No Rothschild is English. No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians." -- Ezra Pound