Thanks, Mark, for pointing out the differences between Jamestown, as a predominantly commercial venture, and Plymouth being a religious venture. The Pilgrims very clearly identified themselves with the Israelites in The Bible. In fact, John Winthrop, in his famous address to the Pilgrims, "A Model Of Christian Charity," actually makes a distinction between the Israelites and the Canaanites, most likely in reference to the Native Indians they would encounter:
https://history.hanover.edu/texts/winthmod.htmlAnd while you are right that race mixing was seemingly non-existent--at least officially--among the Pilgrims, there were two sanctioned mix-race marriages in the Massachusetts Colony, which I found reference to. But that's only two in the first 150 years or so. Nonetheless, those two marriages are enough to pollute thousands of American bloodlines down through the years.
As far as Jamestown is concerned, I think I may have figured out where Swift got the false idea that Pocahontas was White; however, based on the facts, it's hard to imagine that he could possibly believe it.
Swift states that Pocahontas' father was actually "King Philip", a White Indian Chief. There was, in fact, an Indian Chief named Metacomet, who had adopted the English name "King Philip" because his father had had friendly relations with the Pilgrims in Plymouth. But there are two problems here--King Philip was born long after Pocahontas had died, and secondly, all available sources describe "King Philip" as a Indian savage, including the famous Captivity Narrative by Mary Rowlandson:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/851/851-h/851-h.htmFor anyone who still holds the romantic notions that the Native Indians were peace-loving hippies who lived in harmony with nature, I suggest you read the Rowlandson account--it is hair-raising and will leave you absolutely horrified at how these savages lived--not much different from Native Africans.
And one of the interesting take aways from the Rowlandson account is that she pejoratively referred to Indians converted to Christianity as "Praying Indians," clearly not taking seriously the idea that Indians could possibly be considered Christian. She repeatedly points out the savagery of these supposed "Praying Indians," and we can see how they are not different from the savage Negros and Mestizos today who are allegedly "Christian".
Below please see an artist's rendition of the "Praying Indian," Chief Geronimo Vicious and one of his CI followers:
"No Rothschild is English. No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians." -- Ezra Pound