This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.

"Ape" men

Re: "Ape" men

Postby Staropramen » Sun Jun 01, 2014 12:41 pm

MikeTheAdamite wrote:I just had a thought that Id like to share-I've not read anywhere of any of the fallen angels being female.all the references to them that I know of in the apocryphal books or elsewhere have them only mentioned as male.This might help explain why the fallen angels (cro magnon?)mated with animals because there were no females to breed with.
This might seem a trivial point but I thought it worth mentioning.I might be wrong as I've obviously not read most of the literature right through.


I've wondered about this too. Bill has suggested the fallen angels, once embodied were White. They were creations of Yahweh so that is reasonable. If there were embodied, female fallen angels that procreated with the males of their race that might explain the existence of pre-Adamic White people that some carbon dating has suggested. I'm not sure if what is believed to be Whites from before 7,400 years ago includes both male and female remains.
"If God is a Jew then the only thing left for us to do is commit suicide"
-Dr. Wesley A. Swift
Historical Recordings of interest to Christians;
http://historicalrecordings.net/
User avatar
Staropramen
 
Posts: 2026
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:58 pm

Re: "Ape" men

Postby MikeTheAdamite » Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:00 pm

Well,to back my point up,genesis 6:1 and 6:4 only talk about taking wives of the daughters of men,no mention of Any females seducing men and marrying them!so before Adam and eve came along and their adamic offspring,there may not have been any females to mate with.
MikeTheAdamite
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:38 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Re: "Ape" men

Postby MikeTheAdamite » Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:53 pm

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 78663.html

I'm not sure if this is common knowledge here but this seems to have been a widely publicized study from 2006 which shows that even evolutionary scientists were coming to an understanding that some early 'men' had interbred with apes and created hybrids.
MikeTheAdamite
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:38 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Re: "Ape" men

Postby Lang » Fri Jun 06, 2014 9:51 pm

Based on the facts science has and what we understand through CI, it seems that there were early men who are possibly the native, original population of the earth, and may be included in the beastly creation, or may be a result of hybridity. While Adamkind would be a superior form of life, made in God's image (dna?), and what would differ us from these native men is that we got the spirit or dna, and therefore we are godlike, so the dominion of the earth was given into us. So, in order to keep this status of a master race, we must preserve this godlike dna. And when we mix it with beastly, native dna, we get down in the ladder, losing our status and falling like the fallen angels, while the beast gets up in the ladder at our expense, but obviously can never reach the master level. That is how I understand it.
"Give a hammer to a white, and he will build civilization;
Give a hammer to an asian, and he will build other hammers;
Give a hammer to an arab, and he will kill his wife;
Give a hammer to a nigger, and he will kill whites;
Give a hammer to a jew, and he will sell it to niggers.
"

J.M.
User avatar
Lang
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:30 pm
Location: Southern Brazil

Re: "Ape" men

Postby MikeTheAdamite » Sat Jun 07, 2014 10:41 am

Yes I go along with the idea that these early 'people' that inhabited the world before Adam were hybrids resulting from the fallen angels (cro magnon?)copulating with apes/monkeys.The fallen angels then copulated with these hybrids creating a less ape like hybrid and so on until there were offspring that could be called 'people',appearing more man like than ape but ALWAYS carrying those ape genes no matter how diluted.
These evolutionary scientists seem at least to be on the right track but still a long way from the truth if they refuse to reject evolution completely as I did several years ago.it should be strikingly obvious that civilisation appeared suddenly around 7,000 years ago and didn't slowly develop over many hundreds of thousands of years as you would have to expect with their understanding.
MikeTheAdamite
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:38 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Re: "Ape" men

Postby Lang » Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:56 pm

There is a missing link between the earlier men and today's white men. There is no possibly way those guys evolved to a point that they became us. Dogs jumping in the water don't evolve into fishes and crocodiles moving on the ground don't evolve into dogs. There is a missing link. Also, scientists say the "human being" i in the world since 200.000 years ago, but civilization definetly started around 10.000 years ago as you pointed out. This can only mean that a new species joined the world, but it also makes me wonder if those early civilizations that were enemies of Israel, like Babylon, Assyria, etc, were actually white.

Hitler had interest in searching these civilizations, specially Sumeria and India. India, however, was indeed controled by a white caste, and some authors claim the whole hindu religion developed around this.
"Give a hammer to a white, and he will build civilization;
Give a hammer to an asian, and he will build other hammers;
Give a hammer to an arab, and he will kill his wife;
Give a hammer to a nigger, and he will kill whites;
Give a hammer to a jew, and he will sell it to niggers.
"

J.M.
User avatar
Lang
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:30 pm
Location: Southern Brazil

Re: "Ape" men

Postby MikeTheAdamite » Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:31 am

I think it is quite possible that Babylon and Assyria had been infiltrated (and therefore influenced)by canaanites from early on.that would explain their nature but I'm not sure that can be proven from scripture.We know Egypt had been infiltrated from the time of Moses so quite likely that they had too!

'infiltrated' is probably not the right word to use as the canaanites would not be strictly speaking infiltrators as there was no law forbidding their acceptance in those nations but I think they should be classed as such as adamic people were instructed from the begining not to eat from the tree of good and evil.
MikeTheAdamite
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:38 am
Location: Lancashire UK

Previous

Return to Creationism vs Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron