Ethelwulf wrote:Would any of you believe in evolution if you never read the Bible?
Before I ever read the Bible, I read Sagan's Cosmos twice (at the time I liked his history of the development of modern science), a few chunks of Hawking (i.e., the beginning chapters of A Brief History of Time), and a host of clowns like them. All of this was in my teens and early 20's (the 1970's and early 1980's). But I never accepted their religion. Yes, Evolution is a religion. It is not a science, because its processes cannot be scientifically explained or duplicated. And please, do not confuse theoretical sophistry with scientific explanation. Scientific explanation describes a known process, such as photosynthesis or animal reproduction, step-by-step in detail. A belief in Evolution is a belief in something not seen.
So I could not ever accept Evolution even though I had never read the Bible, and being raised in Catholic schools I typically knew little-to-nothing about it. I first read the Bible in the later months of 1997.
Ethelwulf wrote:Evolution (chemical, biological etc) is a process only.
Confusion confusion, the jew is the author of confusion. Evolution is a process which has never been observed in Nature, and therefore it is actually not a process at all. The labeling of the ocurrences of variation among species as Evolution is a modern insistence which confuses the original issue.
Originally Evolution described the idea that higher species developed from constant and incremental minor changes which occured over presumably long periods of time among lower species. This is what my Catholic schools taught as "Evolution" and as "Science" in the 1960's and 1970's for the few years I suffered them.
But the labeling of species variation as Evolution (or "Micro Evolution", et al.) is a sleight-of-hand trick concocted so that the idea of Evolution as a concept can more easily be kept in the public arena. It is just as readily admitted that all species have an ability to variate within certain boundaries, and that ability was created along with any particular species which manifests it. The holy grail, so to speak, of Evolution is the changing of what is perceived as one species into what is perceived as another species, and this has never happened. Yahweh God created everything as He said, kind (species) after kind (species), although the labeling by man of what constitutes a species is also demonstrably imperfect.
So in conclusion, just because the jews and their atheist bag-holders wish to define the terms which we use, does not mean that I am going to play along with their games. Species variation is not Evolution just because some kike bastards claim that it should be labeled as such.
So now you know why I use "Evolution" as what you maintain is too general a term. I will not desist.