This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.
"Says [a woman]:
At the time, I didn't want to think badly of David, so I decided to reserve judgement until I knew more. But I couldn't help being skeptical of his explanation for squandering that much money. If someone sincerely believed he had a way to beat the system, then why in God's name couldn't he figure out that his method was no good after placing many small bets and losing, say, $100? Or $200? Why did he have to spend $100,000 before he figured out his method was worthless? It just doesn't wash. And as Birdman points out, it was not his own money, it came from donations to his organization.
I have to say that I was suspicious of DD long before that. At an American Renaissance conference, I was sitting with Phil Rushton during a lecture, and David kept winking at me furiously. It was bizarre! I couldn't imagine why he would be flirting so blatantly and insistently with me, but it struck me as insincere. I wasn't devastatingly beautiful, and instinctively I felt he must be hoping to use me for some end. So I just ignored him.
Later on that same day, I talked to David, and he really is remarkably good looking and charismatic. But he said something to me (sotto voce) to indicate that he didn't really go for "all that religious stuff," but he pretended to believe it in order to get more supporters. I guess he thought this would score points with me because he knew I'm a researcher (therefore an atheist??) (big non sequitur) but my reaction was just the opposite -- I found it deeply disturbing. I didn't say anything at the time, but my feeling is that if he's an atheist, he should simply avoid talking about religion, but not pretend to be a Christian. I talked with him on the phone several times after that, and he sent me 2 large boxes of Jewish Supremicism to send to all my heretic friends, which I had no trouble giving out to people."
Teutonic wrote:If Duke believes that the Jews are the people of the Old Testament, then his profession of faith as a Christian is completely meaningless.
wmfinck wrote:However we did not see any serious academic work about the Bible or history in any of the common literature about Blake Sawyer on the internet. You would think that the guy that David Duke considers “a true and magnificent Biblical scholar” would have published some work somewhere that actually qualifies him as such a scholar. We are not going to see his life-saving information, because he wants $30 a year to subscribe to his website. [If I could get a mere $3 a year from each person who accesses Christogenea, I could live in a mansion on the beach rather than a double-wide in the back woods where I live now.]
Staropramen wrote:One year ago Davie Puke did a program with a judeo-clown scholar-tard called Blake Sawyer. Here is the intro to Puke's program;
http://christogenea.org/podcasts/david- ... ake-sawyer
Shortly thereafter Bill addressed the claims of this so-called "true and magnificent Christian scholar";
http://christogenea.org/system/files/au ... e_Jews.mp3
http://christogenea.org/podcasts/camp-saints-revisitedwmfinck wrote:However we did not see any serious academic work about the Bible or history in any of the common literature about Blake Sawyer on the internet. You would think that the guy that David Duke considers “a true and magnificent Biblical scholar” would have published some work somewhere that actually qualifies him as such a scholar. We are not going to see his life-saving information, because he wants $30 a year to subscribe to his website. [If I could get a mere $3 a year from each person who accesses Christogenea, I could live in a mansion on the beach rather than a double-wide in the back woods where I live now.]
Return to Christian Identity Directions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests