Catherine wrote:Obviously, this thread has my interest.
It was apparent to all the other children that these were, by far, his favorite children.
I was appalled needless to say. And, maybe the ONLY reason that polygamy doesn't scare me now is I'm passed child bearing days and wouldn't be affected AS MUCH. I would be effected somewhat because being human, I'd also have MY favorite younger wives to help and would be angry if he didn't care for their children the same way I did.
The entire situation could enlarge our numbers, but could it also do so much damage that our white babies could grow up resentful and hating all of us? Wow, even writing these words makes me angry at the jews for us even to have to consider such things to help our own.
Cathy
Cathy, I'm not sure how it would enlarge our numbers to be honest. I'd rather see white communities in an ecclesiastical situation where elders are the literal local government (which is how the ekklesia was set up in the Old Testament and how it is supposed to operate - and has at times operated - in the New Testament).
But you are right, in that the jealousy and feeling of not being preferred would get to some of the kids. Look at our very inceptions as a nation - right back to Jacob Israel. He has four wives (two are handmaidens of Leah and Rachel), and of course Joseph is the favorite son, because Joseph was from Jacob's favorite wife. Now, how Jacob came to have more than one wife, we can really blame on Grandpa Laban for being a manipulative punk, and conning Jacob into it. However, Jacob was not evidently wise enough to keep his feelings of preference to himself. I can't imagine myself in those shoes, and wouldn't want to be in them at all. I think this was a weakness in many of the Adamic nations that came and went throughout history, especially as it pertained to royalty. If this one king takes 200 wives, well, there's roughly 200 of the king's brethren that don't get to marry. That's real considerate of your kinsmen there, your highness.