polygamy -right or wrong?

[MikeTheAdamite]

But I agree Mark,finding one decent woman is hard enough is this satanised world!

And Staroperaman,your right-would anybody really want 3(or more?)?

[Kentucky]

But would it not be better for 1 CI believer to have 3 women than for them to be shared amongst Judeo Christians, pagans or Athiests ?

The reason polygamy was acceptable in ancient Israel (IMHO) is because it was an agrarian society. The dynamics of that social construct no longer exist.

I'm not suggesting CI believers go out and get themselves additional wives/girlfriends but there is logic in the idea!

As I recall, there was a big debate in the early 1990's in the now defunct CI newspaper, The Jubilee. The advocate for polygamy was the CI musician Jonathan David Brown and I forget was the guy was that opposed it. But, it seemed to me that the justification for polygamy in this day and age lost the debate. Perhaps it was because Brown had two girlfriends at the time (LOL). I did hear about 2-3 years ago that Brown had renounced CI and went to Odinism... maybe they were more accepting of multiple wives. The whole affair, among many, many debates, appeared to be divisive and against the main focus of Christian Identity studies, the racial message of God's Word.

Mark

[NicoChristian]

The Israelites practiced polygamy because they were more often than not at war. This required a large male population; many of whom were killed in combat. Many men would have died unmarried and there would have been a shortage of men due to the constant warfare. The only way to maintain a large male population to fight during war would be with polygamous marriages. Obviously this is not the only reason for polygamy, but it certainly contributed to the need. Our societies for the most part have been peaceful for the past 70 years. Coupled with many other factors we do not have a high death-rate so as a result our birth-rate has also suffered. It may sound strange given our current degradation, but a high or relatively high death-rate is necessary for a younger healthier population. Those who are blessed with long-life will receive it, but the majority will die somewhat younger and a large birth-rate will replace the population and keep us younger and healthier as a population. This is how we have mostly been throughout history and only in our degraded age have people been having less children and living much longer as a whole. Many will say great: the average person can expect to live till 80-90 years old. Wrong, too many old people need taking care of; need looking after and take up too many resources while contributing little. Do these people deserve to be looked after because they've contributed all their lives? I say a good majority do not; why, because many of the baby-boomer generation and twenties generation are responsible for the mess we're in now. Many of them were selfish degenerates, who supported desegregation, supported homosexuality and liberalism, used contraceptives and did all manner of sins to put mine and younger generations in the mess we're in now. They screwed up and now they want us to look after them after they've ruined our society, after they allowed mass hordes of beasts to enter our countries. Yes, not all of those generations we're evil; but not enough of them stood up to evil and now younger people have been born into a thoroughly evil society. It's childish and irresponsible to screw up society for the following generation they expect the next generation to look after you after you've had your fun.

May be it's somewhat off topic, but valid points regardless.

[MikeTheAdamite]

I agree totally with those points Nico.The almost unanimous opposition to National Socialist Germany by our previous generations just shows how dumb they really were in political terms anyway.Unforgivable?? No,they must be forgiven as there is only one unforgivable sin-Race mixing.

[Catherine]

Nico,

As a baby boomer I do understand where you're coming from. I loathe what has happened to our country also and what you will have to deal with. I'll be 60 on my next birthday, a few months away. Please don't include me in the not wanting to help scenario if I get older. But, you're right, it was those spoiled hateful snotty brats of the 60s who helped usher in this mess.

Star: Yapping women. lolol. No kidding.

Now, to the question. Polygamy, yes or no? It's not the best solution, but I agree, if it was that or our race dying out I would say yes. I could easily see myself in the position of helping the younger white ladies raise their children, especially if we are talking about re-populating our numbers so the younger white women would have to have many more babies than they are now. Being passed child rearing age, I would gladly step up to do all I could to help the mothers get these babies raised in a Godly manner.

Cathy

[Catherine]

I've taught Sunday School and I was a substitute teacher for ten years, only had one year of college so I didn't have a teaching certificate. We older people could do such things. I also love gardening and could tend gardens, and yes, that means working in the fields. I would most definitely do this to help my white race.

[Joe]

Well good on you Cathy, bless you, I think you do set a good example to young white women by wanting to help raise children. I know selfish women your age who cannot get past feminism.

[wmfinck]

Well good on you Cathy, bless you, I think you do set a good example to young white women by wanting to help raise children. I know selfish women your age who cannot get past feminism.

Once upon a time grandparents had an important role in child-rearing. They were not merely babysitters while parents were working, tied to the TV and yelling at screaming kids.

Rather they were engaged with the children and through that engagement they transmitted down to their grandchildren the values and morals as well as the folk-tales and traditions of our culture.

Now our kids get all that from the jews on the electronic rabbis most families have in every room.

What a wonderful world they have created.

[Catherine]

Obviously, this thread has my interest.

Isa 4:1 And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.

About 30 years ago I read a book by a woman who had been raised in a Morman polygamist family. Her story was quite heart breaking. Her father had married about 7 women and he had many children. All their homes were on the same parcel of land and yet he spent most of his time with the barren wife. I can't help but think it was to not have to deal with the children so much. How sad. He also had married sisters, I think they were twins, and they had several children between the two of them. It was apparent to all the other children that these were, by far, his favorite children.

I was appalled needless to say. And, maybe the ONLY reason that polygamy doesn't scare me now is I'm passed child bearing days and wouldn't be affected AS MUCH. I would be effected somewhat because being human, I'd also have MY favorite younger wives to help and would be angry if he didn't care for their children the same way I did.

The entire situation could enlarge our numbers, but could it also do so much damage that our white babies could grow up resentful and hating all of us? Wow, even writing these words makes me angry at the jews for us even to have to consider such things to help our own.

Cathy

[wmfinck]

Obviously, this thread has my interest.

Isa 4:1 And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.
...
Cathy

Clifton Emahiser has recently discussed Isaiah 4:1 at length. Maybe it will be worth the look.

http://emahiser.christogenea.org/watchman-s-teaching-letter-199-november-2014

http://emahiser.christogenea.org/watchman-s-teaching-letter-200-december-2014