What to reject and what to keep?

[wmfinck]

Nico, I am happy that you clarified your position. I was not trying to lump you with Eli, however there are a myriad of CI Pastors yesterday and today who subscribe to a form of "Dominion Theology", nearly all predicated upon an unjust reading of Genesis 1:26-28 (and then they turn around and claim that they are descended from the "other" Adam of Genesis 2:7, what clowns they are). They claim that Adam was to rule over the "other races" with God's Word, and civilize them. There is absolutely no license for such an assertion anywhere in Scripture. From your original post, I was afraid that you were persuaded by them. I thank Yahweh God you are not!

The name of this thread is "What to reject and what to keep?" The first things that must go are a tendency towards sacramentalism, which leads to the dominance of a priesthood of mercenary babblers, and the idea that we should ever have any sort of relationship with non-Whites. "Come out from among them, and touch not the unclean..."

[Filidh]

Filidh says

remember that obediance thru fear lasts only a short while, while obediance thru love lasts forever. father isn't up there tapping his toes saying "when are they gonna get it right". he's up there weeping for our folk, yearning for our obediance thru love. that's why paul relayed his message of putting away the spirit of fear and putting on the spirit of love.

I will remember that, nice thoughts and words.
You misspelled obedience however and didn't capitalize Father or Paul, as usual. lol

didn't see your edit before.

i understand the wondering-why of the reason for what may seem to be a lack of grammatical knowledge. i spell obediance that way because i pronounce it as 'o-bee-dee-ans', rather than 'o-bee-dee-ens'.

it's a short-but-sturdy step towards spelling things how they sound and not how dictionarywriters and jewish professors want them to be spelled, and by implementing their antiphonetic spellings they drive the broad masses to illiteracy - and this they did on purpose.

and i spell as this for the purpose of the bringing-about of a commonspeech, in the same way as the koine-greek was the slang and street language, and not the language of the atticist elitists, thus enabling the newtestament to be spread, and also paralleled with vulgarlatin, that a new effectiveness might be reached in the coming years in the establishment of a commonspeech to replace literary-english, similarly but not exactly as the way the nationalsocialists began reconquering the germanlanguage and were subsequently criticized by all of the german literary-elitists, and yet who in the end were victorious.

such is the purpose.

edit for clarity. also, i'm not meaning to jump on you, but figure i owe an explanation for the speechstyle i'm using as opposed to literary-english, and now's as good a time as any.