A Jew Can Write About Jews in Porn

[wmfinck]

What are we ashamed of?

This brief overview and analysis of the role and motivations behind pornographers and performers is intended to shed light on a neglected topic in American Jewish popular culture. Little has been written about it. Books such as Howard M. Sachar’s A History of the Jews in America (New York: Knopf, 1992) simply ignore the topic. And you can bet that the 350th anniversary of the arrival of the Jews in the United States did not include any celebrations of Jewish innovation in this field. Even the usually tolerant Time Out New York has been too prim to deal with it, although the more iconoclastic Heeb plans an issue on it. In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.

http://www.jewishquarterly.org/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

Of course, when White Christians point these things out, they are "anti-semites". Maybe Abrams should write about Jewish hypocrisy, but then again, he would expose himself as well.

[Teutonic]

I point out this connection all the time, only to be told that I blame the Jews for everything. To which I often reply: "Yes! And you know who else blamed the Jews for everything? -Hitler. And you know what happened when he got rid of them? - all kinds of wonderful things, like getting rid of anti-Christian filth like pornography!"

Whenever something partakes of the dishonorable and base, trust that there be a Jew behind it.

[brucebohn]

As Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner put it (E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003), ‘Jewish rebellion has broken out on several levels’, one being ‘the prominent role of Jews as advocates to sexual experimentation’. Overall, then, porn performers are a group of people who praise rebellion, self-fulfilment and promiscuity.

What are we ashamed of?



A "Sex Cult" that has been attacking the DNA of Adamic man
since the Garden. The rebellion has always been with us, and
it shall end for them with a Bang, or in honor of Jeremy, we
shall call it a "bang along".. Another big , in your face, and
from the Jewish quarterly no less....
Mainstream will never follow up.

[EzraLB]

E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003

E. Michael Jones has written extensively on how the jews have historically used sexual liberation as a tool for political control. For those interested, I'd recommend his book on the subject, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control which I have in my library.

We need to be cautious with E. Michael Jones because he is a staunch Catholic, who despite his Harvard education, actually lends credibility to some the the alleged sightings of the Fatima, the bleeding/weeping statues of Mary.

Being a Catholic, Jones does not believe in the biological/racial reality of the jews. Rather, he believes that the jews have been rebellious from early times because the have rejected "Logos" or "The Word" of God. And all the jews, as a race, have to do to stop being so evil is to accept "Logos" or the divine order, and all order will be restored, with the Pope smiling happily in the Vatican.

Jones never really can come up with a plausible explanation as to why the jews reject God's order over and over again; he just knows that they do, and that they must stop. As such, he believes in the power of baptism, and he truly believes that jews, historically, have successfully been converted into Christians. And, of course, Jones believes that the jews are descendants of certain rebellious Hebrews/Israelites of the OT.

Despite all these non-CI ideas, E. Michael Jones does do his homework, and does it very well. His unique research is extensive and well-documented. Libido Dominandi traces our cult of sexual liberation back to Adam Weishaupt and the Jesuits, but of course it goes back all the way to the Garden of Eden. When Jones argues for a Judeo-Masonic nexus behind the sexualization of our Christian culture, he seems to suggest that it isn't just the jews behind this nefarious movement, as it includes anyone who rejects God's Order such as Alfred Kinsey, a White man. Thus when reading Jones, one always needs to take care to see the jewish puppet masters behind the likes of Kinsey.

Ultimately Jones' thesis is correct, at least on the surface: that the sexual revolution made us slaves to our appetites, not free from our oppressors. Our oppressors gave us that freedom precisely in order to control and enslave us.

I would also recommend Jones' other major work, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact On World History, with the same caveats.