brucebohn wrote:E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003
E. Michael Jones has written extensively on how the jews have historically used sexual liberation as a tool for political control. For those interested, I'd recommend his book on the subject,
Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control which I have in my library.
We need to be cautious with E. Michael Jones because he is a staunch Catholic, who despite his Harvard education, actually lends credibility to some the the alleged sightings of the Fatima, the bleeding/weeping statues of Mary.
Being a Catholic, Jones does not believe in the biological/racial reality of the jews. Rather, he believes that the jews have been rebellious from early times because the have rejected "Logos" or "The Word" of God. And all the jews, as a race, have to do to stop being so evil is to accept "Logos" or the divine order, and all order will be restored, with the Pope smiling happily in the Vatican.
Jones never really can come up with a plausible explanation as to
why the jews reject God's order over and over again; he just knows that they do, and that they must stop. As such, he believes in the power of baptism, and he truly believes that jews, historically, have successfully been converted into Christians. And, of course, Jones believes that the jews are descendants of
certain rebellious Hebrews/Israelites of the OT.
Despite all these non-CI ideas, E. Michael Jones does do his homework, and does it very well. His unique research is extensive and well-documented.
Libido Dominandi traces our cult of sexual liberation back to Adam Weishaupt and the Jesuits, but of course it goes back all the way to the Garden of Eden. When Jones argues for a Judeo-Masonic nexus behind the sexualization of our Christian culture, he seems to suggest that it isn't just the jews behind this nefarious movement, as it includes anyone who rejects God's Order such as Alfred Kinsey, a White man. Thus when reading Jones, one always needs to take care to see the jewish puppet masters behind the likes of Kinsey.
Ultimately Jones' thesis is correct, at least on the surface: that the sexual revolution made us slaves to our appetites, not free from our oppressors. Our oppressors gave us that freedom precisely in order to control and enslave us.
I would also recommend Jones' other major work,
The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact On World History, with the same caveats.
"No Rothschild is English. No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians." -- Ezra Pound