Hitler encompassed

[Joe]

From some garbage website reporting on the new edition of Mein Kampf that includes 'academic notes':

“We firmly connect Hitler’s text with our comments, so that both are always on the same double page. I could describe it in martial terms as a battle of annihilation — we are encircling Hitler with our annotations.

“Our principle was that there should be no page with Hitler’s text without critical annotations. Hitler is being interrupted, he is being criticised, he is being refuted if necessary.”

Psalm 118
11 They compassed me about ; yea, they compassed me about : but in the name of the LORD I will destroy them. 12 They compassed me about like bees; they are quenched as the fire of thorns: for in the name of the LORD I will destroy them. 13 Thou hast thrust sore at me that I might fall : but the LORD helped me. 14 The LORD is my strength and song, and is become my salvation.

I am sure Hitler will prevail no matter how hard they try to slander him.

[Fenwick]

Ha, that's brilliant Joe. Sometimes I wonder if they do these stupid wordplays deliberately, or if devils are always prone to coming into conflict with scripture.


For all the good their annotations do. Who buys a new edition of Mein Kampf? People have been reading it online for decades, and anyone who was really interested in Hitler's views wouldn't bother to buy some expensive scribbled on version.

[Teutonic]

Hitler suffered enough while he was alive, enduring poverty and war, as well as having to witness everything he had worked so hard for vanish into thin air as the Bolsheviks captured Berlin.

To think that he continues to be persecuted even after his death.

[Staropramen]

So in other words they have "Scofield-ized" Mein Kampf. How original. Of course Christogenea is already three steps ahead of them with The Mein Kampf Project;

http://mk.christogenea.org/

[EzraLB]

As Mark has pointed out here in the forum many times, the jews obsessively have to control the conversation about everything, and they poison the language to steer people away from ever understanding an issue the jews want obfuscated.

That said, here's review of "Mein Kampf" from 1940 by none other than George Orwell, author of "1984". This is the first review I've ever read that does NOT mention the jews even once. Yes, he takes many obligatory shots at Hitler, but reading between the lines, there also seems to be some begrudging admiration of the man:

http://boingboing.net/2014/08/17/orwell ... kampf.html

[Fenwick]

That said, here's review of "Mein Kampf" from 1940 by none other than George Orwell, author of "1984". This is the first review I've ever read that does NOT mention the jews even once. Yes, he takes many obligatory shots at Hitler, but reading between the lines, there also seems to be some begrudging admiration of the man:

http://boingboing.net/2014/08/17/orwell ... kampf.html

Interesting that he touches on the issue of hedonism offering security and entertainment, but nothing to struggle or strive for.

I've often thought that that's the main benefit of Christian society. If you follow the laws of God properly, you have a society of wealth, plenty and uplifting activities. But it all takes hard work, and that gives people the challenges that they crave, without the need for war or crime to use up their energy.


Hitler needed some war rhetoric because he needed to rally his people to throw off their oppressors. Had he succeeded in the long term, I doubt that he would have had much interest in trying to maintain a war-frenzy indefinitely.

[Kentucky]

That said, here's review of "Mein Kampf" from 1940 by none other than George Orwell, author of "1984". This is the first review I've ever read that does NOT mention the jews even once. Yes, he takes many obligatory shots at Hitler, but reading between the lines, there also seems to be some begrudging admiration of the man

This is just my opinion, but Orwell's 1984 was cloaking his criticism of jewish communism. Evidently, he was scared of the jew, should he overtly expose their machinations. He probably well understood their murderous and deceiveable means to an end. The actual year 1984 hadn't quite matched the novel, but 2015 is nearing fulfillment.

Mark

[EzraLB]

This is just my opinion, but Orwell's 1984 was cloaking his criticism of jewish communism. Evidently, he was scared of the jew, should he overtly expose their machinations. He probably well understood their murderous and deceiveable means to an end.

I don't think you're going out on a limb here, Mark. After all, the "counter-revolutionist" in "1984" is a character named Emmanuel Goldstein, and Orwell not so subtly modeled him after Leon Trotsky, who wrote the book The Revolution Betrayed, which is a diatribe against the Soviet "Big Brother" Joseph Stalin.

Like many writers and artists of his generation, Orwell early in life was an idealist who was firmly on the Left politically, and actually went to Spain to fight against the "Fascists". While in Spain, he experienced first hand the insanity, contradictions, and brutality of the communists when they labeled Orwell himself a fascist, even though he was fighting on their side. It was this experience in Spain that probably provided the material for revolutionary "double speak".

Like any self-respecting White man, Orwell obviously showed that he was repulsed by jews at different times in his life. In fact, he once pointed out that during the German bombing raids in London, the cowardly jews were notorious for safely hiding in the subway tunnels. At the same time, as a writer he was beholden to the jews who promoted his career--and was friends with many jews, so many in fact, that the presence of jews at his funeral was impossible to not notice.

His essay, "AntiSemitism In Britain" was actually published in a jewish journal, and it's worth reading to better understand his conflicted views on jews. He rightly points out how prior to WWII, antisemitism was an accepted part of polite English society and literary tradition:

http://www.george-orwell.org/AntiSemiti ... ian/0.html

Predictably, the jews can't make their mind up about Orwell's antisemitism. Their admire him for being a caustic critic of society and yet can't entirely forgive him for his unsavory observations about jews at times.

And it's the ultimate irony that the jews, in their blind self-love, fail to understand that had it not been for their own brutal revolutionary double-mindedness and hypocrisy, which Orwell witnessed with his own eyes during the Spanish Revolution, "1984" could never have been written. Here we see how the jews pathetically attempt to turn Orwell into a "kosher" antisemite:

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/was- ... e-1.455763

At the end of the day, in writing "1984" Orwell did, in fact, perhaps unwittingly, expose jewish treachery and double-mindedness. With that in mind, it's not difficult to fathom why his review of "Mein Kampf" wasn't exactly as scathing as the jews would have preferred.

[Fenwick]

This is just my opinion, but Orwell's 1984 was cloaking his criticism of jewish communism. Evidently, he was scared of the jew, should he overtly expose their machinations. He probably well understood their murderous and deceiveable means to an end. The actual year 1984 hadn't quite matched the novel, but 2015 is nearing fulfillment.

Mark

I don't know if he was consciously anti-jewish, but in is writings he always seems like a man who can't make his emotions match his ideology. He was contracted to write The Road to Wigan Pier as a piece of red agitprop, which he did, but then proceeded to write exactly why socialism was failing:

“One sometimes gets the impression that the mere words ‘Socialism’ and ‘Communism’ draw towards them with magnetic force every fruit-juice drinker, nudist, sandal-wearer, sex-maniac, Quaker, ‘Nature Cure’ quack, pacifist, and feminist in England.”

1984, from a British perspective (the book is full of allusions to British politics of the 30s and 40s) is more specifically a cautionary tale of how socialism can go wrong when the Parliamentary Labour party took it's early success and turns towards the politics of subversion and cultural revolution.

Since the Labour party did go on to do this in the 50s and 60s, with all the marxist plots we know of today, it seems Orwell was well aware of the practices of the forces behind the left, though if he was aware of the jew specifically, he never said so directly.

Animal Farm was his more basic criticism of Russian communism as a whole, at a time when most leftists were praising Stalin.


Personally, I'd say the rise of Tharcherism in the 70s was what stalled the purist leftists in Britain, although given that it merely replaced the leftist consensus with a sort of new capitalism, the end result was just as useful to the jew.