Scofield and Untermeyer

[EzraLB]

It's naive to think that a Dispensationalist Bible would never have been published had it not been for the work of Cyrus Scofield. He was just one of a huge group at the time advocating this ideology. In 1878, the heavyweights of the American Dispensationalist Movement met at a conference in Niagara Falls, including Socfield, James H. Brooks, Charles Erdman, James Hudson Taylor, William Eugene Blackstone, and many others. There they presented the "Niagara Creed," their agenda and beliefs as follows:

“We believe that the world will not be converted during the present dispensation, but is fast ripening for judgment, while there will be a fearful apostasy in the professing Christian body; and hence that the Lord Jesus will come in person to introduce the millennial age, when Israel shall be restored to their own land, and the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord; and that this personal and premillennial advent is the blessed hope set before us in the Gospel for which we should be constantly looking.”

It's not hard to see how the Jews sought to exploit the statement, "...Israel shall be restored to their own land." And I'm sure it was through the editorial slight of hand at Oxford University Press that it morphed over time into "The Jews shall be restored to Palestine" along with many other deceptions.

Cyrus Scolfield, like many of his fellow dispensationalists, was a very ambitious man, and I'm sure he was flattered by the attention that such a powerful man as Samuel Untermyer paid him--and never gave a second thought as to why this Jew, one of "The Chosen," was so interested in this Christian ideology.

The idea of publishing a Reference Bible to support dispensationalism was probably not original to Scofield, but he was the one with the vanity and ambition to take on such a project. Given the right financial inducements, I'm sure it wasn't difficult for Untermyer to get Scofield to do his bidding, including, and most importantly, signing over the copyright ownership to Oxford so that they would have ultimate control over the book and the movement long after the useful idiot was out of the picture.

[Staropramen]

It's no coincidence that in the 1970's Samuel Untermyer's estate became a breeding ground for satanic cults including the group responsible for the Son of Sam shootings.

http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/untermyer-park

[EzraLB]

Yeah, Staro, apparently the Jew, David Berkowitz, aka The Son Of Sam, spent a lot of time in the Untermyer Gardens. Of course, while in prison Berkowitz claimed to convert to Christianity after reading Psalm 34:6. If only he had read Matthew 15:24, he would have realized his conversion was pointless.

The most pathetic part of his conversion is that a number of Judeo-Christian church groups have supported Berkowitz monetarily and promoted his bogus memoirs. He claimed that he was no longer the "Son of Sam" but now "The Son Of Hope". And these ignorant Christians continue to work hard trying to get him paroled, which is exactly why he converted in the first place.

[wmfinck]

It's naive to think that a Dispensationalist Bible would never have been published had it not been for the work of Cyrus Scofield. He was just one of a huge group at the time advocating this ideology. In 1878, the heavyweights of the American Dispensationalist Movement met at a conference in Niagara Falls, including Socfield, James H. Brooks, Charles Erdman, James Hudson Taylor, William Eugene Blackstone, and many others....

This is absolutely true.

However, America would have gotten into the first world war without the sinking of the Lusitania, and would also have had war with Japan without Pearl Harbor.

So we must point out that Scofield's theology is not in bookstores for a hundred years because it is legitimate, or because it was popular, but rather because it is friendly to the Jews. And I would say the same thing about Bullinger, or any of the others.

Scofield and Bullinger are just two among many, but the fat targets are generally the easiest ones to hit when you need to make a point.

[EzraLB]

However, America would have gotten into the first world war without the sinking of the Lusitania, and would also have had war with Japan without Pearl Harbor.

Both points are true. The Jews would have cooked up another false flag operation if the Lusitania hadn't worked--and if you remember, it didn't work at first. And many people think that if Hitler hadn't made a defense treaty with Japan, the U.S. couldn't have entered the war against Germany. This is naive. Again, they would have figured out another way to do it, and they would have done it, no matter what, international law be damned.

The other issue that people fail to realize is that even if Germany had managed to extend the war even 6 months more, the Jews would have dropped nuclear bombs all over Germany. Those Jewish Hell Bombs were not being developed to drop on the Yellow Man--they were intended for Germany. And I'm sure it was a great disappointment to the Jews that they didn't get an opportunity to use their coup de grace on their hated enemy.

I somehow feel that Yahweh knew this was planned, and He cut the war in Europe short, so that those weapons could be used only against the Yellow Man, the race he never loved in the first place, and spare the seed of Judah from near annihilation.