Terrorist Mandela Dead

[Kentucky]

“There is nothing sacred or inherently superior about non-violent methods of struggle.”
—Nelson Mandela

Published on December 6th, 2013 by Dr. Joel McDurmon

With the media gushing about the greatness of Nelson Mandela now on the day after his death, a counterpoint with the rest of the story is badly needed. Below are a few video interviews of South African missionary Peter Hammond, who tells the real truth about Mandela.
Portrayed as a liberator by the media, Mandela was a Marxist and convicted terrorist. Hammond relates of Mandela:

He admitted in open court—pleaded “guilty”—and remember, he was trained as a lawyer—he pleaded “guilty” to 156 acts of public violence and terrorism. He was the head of the revolutionary terrorist wing of the ANC [African National Congress] “Umkhonto we Sizwe.” And he was behind so many different operations: from the plotting of bombs in the railway station (which killed women and children, which crippled people), bombs in shopping centers, attacks on farmers, . . . so many acts of violence.

He goes on to say that modern portrayals make Mandela out to be a saint, but never mention why he was in prison to begin with. It was for good and just reason. “Not even the Amnesty International would take his case, because they said he wasn’t a political prisoner. He had had a fair trial and a reasonable sentence. He had his day in court. He was not a political prisoner. He was in jail for acts of violence.”

He relates that the crimes for which Mandela was given life imprisonment in South Africa, he would have received the death penalty in the U.S. or Britain at the time. It was the political climate that later got him released, and leftist revisionism that has whitewashed his early life of violence. If anything, Mandela’s legacy is an argument in favor of the death penalty. When such criminals are not disposed of, there is always a chance future political powers may be corrupt enough to release them—perhaps even into positions of power.

In light of the truth about Mandela, Hammond can say, “I’m astounded that so many in the west idolize Nelson Mandela and lift him up as a messianic figure, because they obviously don’t know what he teaches, what he believes, or what he does, or his support for some of the most radical Marxist dictatorships on the planet.”

This includes many Christians: “A lot of Christians out there idolize Nelson Mandela just because they’ve only been given false, misleading, and incomplete information.”

When Mandela fell ill a year ago, the media began to prepare for the very hagiography which it is now publishing about the fallen terrorist. Barack Obama seized the opportunity to tour South Africa, speaking on human rights everywhere he went, invoking the name of Mandela at every stop and praising his work.

A liberal NPR commentator could not contain himself this morning. He lamented the fact that during Obama’s visit to the country, Mandela was too ill for a photo-op: “The first black president of the United States standing beside the first black president of South Africa would’ve made for a powerful moment.”
Or he might have said: “One crypto-communist friend of terrorists standing beside a known communist and convicted terrorist would’ve made for a revealing moment.”

In the wake of the Boston bombings, Obama stated that the acts would be investigated as acts of terrorism, because, “Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terror.”
“Any time. . . .”

Yet this morning, when addressing the death of Mandela only a few months later, the same president said, “We’ve lost one of the most influential, courageous, and profoundly good human beings that any of us will share time with on this earth.”

There is indeed a disconnect in the public discourse.

And yes, even, many Christians will be confused and cornered. Many will find themselves trapped by the perceived dilemma created by the whitewashed narrative of Mandela. If opponents openly criticize him, they risk being publicly associated a friends of apartheid and racism (just as supporters of states’ rights in the U.S. today get associated unduly with slavery and racism). Give Mandela a pass, however, and you give a pass to his Marxist ideology and terrorism. It sounds a lot like many other lesser-of-two-evils decisions presented to us.

If you’d like to learn more about Mandela’s communism, just read the book he himself wrote, and which was part of the loads of evidence used against him in his trial: How to Be a Good Communist.


Mark

[learningaboutCI]

Poor deluded television watchers. They will be snowed under with the sight of this creature, and all similars leaping about.

The truth of his activities has no resonance anyway. White people have come to a point where they believe their televisions. Whatever signs and wonders emerge from it, why, that must be the truth to be obeyed and worshiped.

[Kentucky]

Poor deluded television watchers. They will be snowed under with the sight of this creature, and all similars leaping about.

The truth of his activities has no resonance anyway. White people have come to a point where they believe their televisions. Whatever signs and wonders emerge from it, why, that must be the truth to be obeyed and worshiped.

If it's on TV, it must be true LOL

Mark

[Lang]

Poor deluded television watchers. They will be snowed under with the sight of this creature, and all similars leaping about.

The truth of his activities has no resonance anyway. White people have come to a point where they believe their televisions. Whatever signs and wonders emerge from it, why, that must be the truth to be obeyed and worshiped.

If it's on TV, it must be true LOL

Mark

Exactly. The common belief is that the truth is related to who is saying that, instead of logical thinking or historical facts. Story X is true because the Y guy is saying its true. Something like, "oh, if the guy of the news said this happened, this must be happened, otherwise they would not say it on the news!". And no matter how hard you try to show to someone a historical fact, if nobody talks about it on television, people will not give credibility to it because "if its not being transmitted on TV, theres something wrong with it!".

[Staropramen]

He should have been executed after his conviction.