forum.christogenea.org

I recently saw a documentary about the Lemba; a Negro tribe in South Africa who claim to be descended from the Israelites. Tudor Parfitt a biblical scholar believes he's proven their claims simply because 50% of their males share genetics with modern day Khazaric mamzers. The same scholar seems ready to consider Afghans, Japanese, Indians, American Indians even African Americans as possible Israelites. On the topic of Whites being Israelites, "impossible". The modern day Khazars also seem ready to accept anybody as Israelites bar Whites.

To me it also seems that the Khazars clearly don't take their claim to Israelite ancestry seriously if they're willing to give it out to any non-White. There clearly is an agenda against our Israelite heritage because any race bar Whites can claim it and get top scholars to investigate their claims.

Lastly, despite the Lemba having some genetic similarities with modern Cohens. No merit was given to the obvious difference that the Lemba are dark-skinned Negros. That just reinforced my doubts in DNA testing. Somehow light-skinned Khazars and dark-skinned Negros are blood brothers. Pure stupidity.

I wrote about this last year in 'An Identity Rebuttal to Jewish Voice Today' - Part Part 3, to wit:

"Even though JVT has a missionary arm of going into third world countries with medical freebies, their predecessors of White Protestant missionaries did not do what jews do by awarding aboriginal coloreds an honorary degree of being the long lost tribes of Israel. Whether perceived as literal descendants or gratuitously spiritualized, these primitive people don't have a clue from whence they came. The shallow claim that there is scientific evidence through DNA that tar black Nigerian, Ethiopian and Zimbabwean negroes, all having distinct genetic and thus ethnic differences, are somehow from the same racial stock as King David. David was Adamic and Adam means “to show blood (in the face) i.e. to flush or turn rosy” (Strong's Concordance, #H119). The only people in the world that blush are White people, because we have this built-in mechanism that physically identifies our race when we are embarrassed or have pangs of guilt or react to temperature etc. Have you ever seen a negro or oriental blush or have remorse? Of course not. David was never described as brown skinned or slant eyed. Quite the contrary from I Samuel 17:42 David is described as “ruddy and of a fair countenance,” which is the same Hebrew word (yapheh, yaw-feh #H3303) used to describe Sarah in Gen. 12:11, “a fair woman to look upon.” In the seventh Dead Sea Scroll, Sarah is extolled as “Her skin was pure white, she had long lovely hair.” The jew inspired universalist may argue that 'yapheh' only means beautiful or pleasant, because it can't mean both white and ruddy. But, as a White man I can tell you that we are not in a constant state of blushing, but our racial countenance is never ending. God said of His people, “You only have I known [loved, acknowledged] of all the families [races] of the earth” (Amos 3:2) and “For the Lord has chosen Jacob unto Himself, and Israel for His peculiar treasure” Ps. 135:4. Why would God choose the people that killed the Son of God and have rejected Him for the last 2000 years? Why would anybody believe that God loves jews, when it can be shown that their true identity is Esau-Edom (Malachi 1:3; Romans 9:13)?

JVT is especially proud to embrace the Bnei Menashe of India (who look oriental); the word Menashe having a slight resemblance to Manasseh is enough for Messianic jews to declare them Israelites. The jews have been so eager to prove the ancestry of these indians, that several DNA tests have been conducted and none of them prove haplotypes indicating Middle East origin. It is unscrupulous jews who have dubbed them this name, whom otherwise are known as the Mizo, Kuki and Chin, who all speak a Tibetan-Burmese language, not anything even remotely close to Hebrew, which the Welsh, Irish and Celtic languages most definitely do have an affinity with Hebrew. There are an estimated 9,000 Chin in India and only 350 were tested in one study and 414 in another and no evidence whatsoever was found among the men – all those tested indicated East or Southeast Asian; there were 50 women who showed traces of Middle Eastern. The BBC reported, “The Central Forensic Institute in Calcutta suggests that while the masculine side of the tribes bears no links to Israel, the feminine side suggests a genetic profile with Middle Eastern people that may have arisen through inter-marriage." That's a polite term for race mixing."

http://kinsmanredeemer.com/identity-reb ... day-part-3

Mark

NicoChristian wrote:To me it also seems that the Khazars clearly don't take their claim to Israelite ancestry seriously if they're willing to give it out to any non-White.

The jews don't take their Khazar ancestry seriously because they are no more Khazar than they are German, Russian, Polish, or any other ethnic group that they've lived parasitically among. The real motivation for the jews to promote the Khazar theory was to legitimate the jewish presence in Europe--to answer their antisemitic critics who claimed that the jews didn't belong in Europe because they had no original homeland on the continent. Arthur Koestler, the author of "The Thirteenth Tribe," admitted this was the reason he wrote the book.

The jews do have some Israelite ancestry, but that doesn't make them Israelites. But because the jews--and true Israelites--have race mixed all over the world, it should come as no surprise that those DNA markers show up everywhere.

And it's pretty obvious how "experts" have excluded the White race from having Israelite DNA. It's a shell game. They define "Israelite" as basically arab/jew admixture, which can be found in all non-Whites. And because most Whites don't have this admixture, they can't be Israelite. It's a tautology, a circular argument. The jews are the authors of confusion, especially the DNA question.

I didn't watch it because it is a jew, but I think the title says it all.

Joe, that Israeli jew is clearly mentally ill. He claims that jews are "White" and that black africans are the true Israelites of the Bible. He makes the absurd claim that American jews are populating Israel with jewish "white supremacists" to repress the real black ethiopian jews. He offers no evidence to support this, but the comment section is overwhelmingly supportive of his insane rant.

The supposed conspiracy behind the Bible is that Whites stole the identity of the jews from niggers, who are the true Israelites--and that White supremacists have deleted all references to black Israelites from the Bible, leaving only small clues behind. But it begs the question: if the black Israelites originally wrote the Bible, why are all their descendants illiterate? Why didn't the black Israelites in their dispersion record their true history? Reasoning with negros is completely futile.

If this video demonstrates anything it's how easy it is for jews to lie to negros. Contrary to what some Whites claim, there is no such thing as a truly jew-savvy nigger.

The lost tribe of Dan is ecstatic over the news;

"Yeah, we godz chosem. You gots a prollem wit dat?"