Some people are just too dark to be pure White.

[Filidh]

There's a difference between a permanent, leathery suntan and being swarthy. Listen to Bill's podcast that he posted in this thread for proof. If you go in the sun without a shirt everyday for years on end, your skin will get extremely tanned and it will not go away in the wintertime, but that doesn't equate to having a muddy or moorish look. A lot of Spain, southern Italy, southern France, and especially Greece are obviously of mixed blood. Not denying that at all, just saying that it is very possible and not all that uncommon for Aryans to become extremely tanned and that to confuse those tanned Aryans with mongrels is wrong.

Solomon said: "I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon. Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother's children were angry with me..." Black in this context is a mistranslation obviously and doesn't mean negroidic or arabic in appearance, but heavily tanned.

Just compare the likes of the mongrel Golden Dawn leader to some who might have a tanned look about them. The mongrel will always be recognizable because of the black sheen and certain other features.

I wasn't saying that there isn't a problem with mongrels trying to pretend to be Aryans and sneaking into Nationalsocialistic movements, only that it is possible for Aryans to look tanned enough that some folks confuse them with non-Aryans because they're used to all Aryans having fairer skin due to the culture which promotes wearing clothes all the time, even while working in the sun. But again, facial features, nose, etc has to be taken into account as well, not just how tan they are.

[Staropramen]

"White Nationalism" is jewish plain and simple. The term came into vogue with the secularization of the Christian Patriot movement by Davey Puke and KKK groups being led by godless Don Black types. We are not White Nationalists, we are White Supremacists. That's what the bible teaches. They are not to be trusted. The reaction and banning that I got at jewfront after revealing my previous sin of race-mixing proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt. These are jews-between-the-ears that stand as guards at the door where repentant race-mixers might return to the fold and gleefully lock the door and give them the finger through the window. I will never work with or trust these people ever again. I'll focus my real world evangelizing on ordinary lost White folks. My brother told me many years ago when I first started becoming racially aware "I don't want you around my friends. You can't be trusted. When it comes down to pulling the trigger people like you will crack because of your dual allegiance". At the time I thought he was just being the asshole he's always been. Now I realize he's just a White Nationalist.

"If you act like a jew and work for the jew I'm going to treat you like one"
Dr. Wesley Swift

[bahr]

I don't like the expression "White Supremacist", because in the minds of White people, that expression means that we must rule over non-Whites, i.e. we must be imperialists or missionaries, which is certainly not the case!

We must be the light on the hill. The beasts live in the valleys. We are from above, they are from beneath. We must separate Light and darkness.

Maybe "White Exclusivists" would be more appropriate?

[Nayto]

"White harbingers of mud-race incineration."

[Joe]

Some WN see syrians, iranians and other arabs as White. I'm looking at the renegade crew. The TM crew has a similar agenda, they push satanism (jewish) and paganism, pretending they're hard and that CI is soft and jewish .
Mostly I got tired of the lame "Jesus was a jew" mantra ...even after being told otherwise many times, and priding themselves on debate, they still wouldn't stop with their childish mockery.

I put my faith in God, not in Men. They can keep their bravado, only God can save us ...and if they had the capacity to realise our True nature, they will join us. I agree with Staropraman, some of them are jewish shills who want to keep us away from Our real power ...you can talk about anything but Christ. Once you talk about CI, you are shunned. Who cares, I will not speak to a fool, lest he treat my wise words with contempt. Took me a while to learn that lesson. I have too much to learn to waste time with the clowns of WN, the Bible offers a lifetime of learning and the treasures only accumulate as you learn more and more.

For Nayto, very nice. An invincible Light Will absolutely obliterate the darkness.

[Kentucky]

I don't like the expression "White Supremacist", because in the minds of White people, that expression means that we must rule over non-Whites, i.e. we must be imperialists or missionaries, which is certainly not the case!

We must be the light on the hill. The beasts live in the valleys. We are from above, they are from beneath. We must separate Light and darkness.

Maybe "White Exclusivists" would be more appropriate?

Even if the enemy invents an expression like 'White Supremacist' that doesn't mean we have to accept any arbitrary definitions of what it means. The two words by themselves do not suggest ruling over non-Whites, but rather racial superiority. If we cave in on this, then it means we are either equal to or inferior to non-Whites. Taken to the next level, if they invent a term like Christian Supremacists, do we retreat from defending the faith as superior to all other religions? It's a clever psychological ploy to get our people to deny that God made a particular race above all other races upon the face of the earth (Deut. 7:60). We should be aware that one of the fortes' of the jew is to rape language.

Mark

[Staropramen]

I don't like the expression "White Supremacist", because in the minds of White people, that expression means that we must rule over non-Whites, i.e. we must be imperialists or missionaries, which is certainly not the case!

We must be the light on the hill. The beasts live in the valleys. We are from above, they are from beneath. We must separate Light and darkness.

Maybe "White Exclusivists" would be more appropriate?

We are to have dominion over the entire earth. That means that if there were to be a great awakening of our people prior to the second coming of Christ our homelands must be free from non-whites. But I also believe that it would be necessary to rule over the other races in their homelands rather than leave them to their own devices. This is what Wesley Swift taught and it makes sense to me. If I'm wrong about this could someone please explain?

[Filidh]

ruling over them has historically always led to mixing and then decline. america would be exhibit 'a' here, but also ancient endia, encient egypt, ancient persia, the tocharians, and so on.

we only have dominion over the things that yahweh created. because yahweh didn't create the other races, we don't have dominion over them. on the contrary, they're the eternal enemy and they should all be killed (not necessarily by us, since that would be against the government's rules ). but we should never rule over them because that very thing is part of what caused modern-day america. imagine this country today if we had never brought the niggers over here and just done the work ourselves. there'd be none of them here at all today.

[Kentucky]

We are to have dominion over the entire earth. That means that if there were to be a great awakening of our people prior to the second coming of Christ our homelands must be free from non-whites. But I also believe that it would be necessary to rule over the other races in their homelands rather than leave them to their own devices. This is what Wesley Swift taught and it makes sense to me. If I'm wrong about this could someone please explain?

This was the common thinking in CI about 20 years ago by some. However, there's just too many passages that talk about their destruction, rather than some sort of Kingdom colonialism. Obadiah not only talks about the eradication of Esau-Edom, but also the heathen i.e. non-Whites throughout the world... "as if they never were." God has always practiced a form of population control in nature; species become extinct. If the only reason for having non-Whites in the world was to be a rod of chastisement (pricks and thorns in your eyes) when Israel sinned, then I would think that the restoration of Paradise would not necessitate their presence. As all Israel being saved would have her eyes unencumbered.

Mark

[Joe]

Romans 9:21
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour? 22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known , endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction.

They only exist to serve us, until we are perfected. Judges 3 also.