Nayto says:“I think those things you quoted about Hitler are myths.”
What did I say about Hitler that was a myth. I have admired Adolf Hitler since a child of nine when I begin reading about him. But Adolf Hitler is not Jesus Christ. He put his pants on the same way I do every morning. He was not perfect but sinned or missed the mark like I do every day. Like myself he made bad judgments throughout his life, too. Hitler did not see the “drop of blood” issue as CI. I believe he thought it could be breeded out. This was the only reason I can see of his exemptions of those of part jewish blood. Are we to ignore the truth that these exemptions exist and are signed by Adolf Hitler?
Concerning Milch, David Irving said in his book “GORING” p.131 & 132:
Deadliest of all was the file being built up on Milch by rivals like SA Oberführer
Theo Croneiss in Bavaria. Milch had bankrupted Theo’s little airline
in the twenties, and now Croneiss put it about that Milch’s father was a Jew.
The words flew around the Nazi hierarchy. Gauleiter Joseph Terboven told
his friend Göring, who tackled Milch that August as they were driving back
from the Obersalzberg, where they had just inspected the site for Göring’s new
luxury villa. Milch was shocked and investigated his own blood ancestry. By
October 4, when they met again to inspect the secret uniform being designed
for the new air force, he had established the facts. Milch handed to Göring
a letter written by his mother, establishing beyond doubt that his biological
father was not Anton Milch, but her own uncle. That he was the product
of incest was not pleasant, but for a Staatssekretär in Nazi Germany, it was
preferable to being a half-Jew. On October 14, Göring reprimanded Croneiss
for the slander. Two weeks later he discussed the letter with Hitler, Blomberg,
and Hess. ‘It’s all okay,’ Milch noted in his diary on November 1.
Versions of the story percolated around the air force for the next twelve
years. Lieutenant Colonel Erich Killinger told fellow officers that Milch’s
brother was still a Jew. ‘Milch,’ added Killinger, ‘proved – or claimed – and
his mother, who’s still alive, has confirmed it, that she had had an affair with
a Christian and that Erhard [Milch] was the product. So Milch,’ guffawed
Killinger, unaware of the awful truth, ‘branded his own mother a whore so
as to become a Christian.’
Göring shielded Milch against the slander and never revealed what he knew,
even years later under interrogation in the shadow of the gallows.
Note- “131 Croneiss: BDC file on Croneiss. In 1945 Croneiss was still cited in overheard
prisoners’ conversations as being the authority for Milch’s ‘Jewish’ descent. His
true parental background, of which I am aware, shows that Milch had no Jewish
blood.”
Nayto- Maybe he wasn’t jewish. Irving point’s out that delicate issue above.
Concerning Emil Maurice- this has been well known since the war and the jews don’t like to promote it as a example his Wikipedia page obcures it. I hope the below source will satisfy you:
http://mk.christogenea.org/content/emil ... ile-driverConcerning what is a Mischling and who is and who was:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MischlingMuch info on the net. Before you cut off the head of the messenger. And by the way I generally don’t trust wikipedia but this page has good reference material to continue your study.
Kentucky says about Riggs:“There is only one problem. He doesn't back it up, and he couldn't in most cases. He uses rare exemptions to distort the greater picture. The purpose of the book is likely this: Black propaganda i.e. false information and material that purports to be from a source on one side of a conflict, but is actually from the opposing side.”
Nonsense- One Hundred and twenty nine pages of source notes and probably 60% Bundsachive primary source material. There are several reproductions of said material such as Misching exempt papers in the book. This guy is the David Irving on source materials of the jews.
If we throw every source that is jewish under your bus we would be up the creek. All quotes of quotes from patriot news site and stories from the jewish news media could no longer be used.
Should any jewish book be banned for any quote use under your throw the baby out with the DIRTY bath water? No more Proticols -as it is from a jewish source for example.
Kentucky says – “So here we have an American jew and IDF volunteer who claims that of 210.000 remaining jews in Greater Germany” as many as 150,000 served in a military capacity.
I know he is a jew and we must be careful with his said material and review his sources. Do you think that 150,000 is a large number in a Army fielding 12.5 soldiers and the several more millions of RAD, Volkstrum and SS personal he includes in his overall numbers. He documents 400 jew soldiers in interviews. His high end number is still a drop in the bucket.
Secondly the problem is that Mischlings are counted separately and those of with a lesser degree of Jewish blood are not even counted in Reich censuses. If you lived in Germany in 1935 and had a drop of jewish blood, would you declare it? I am sure many were declaring themselves as Aryans.
Kentucky says-“The purpose of the book is likely this: Black propaganda i.e. false information and material that purports to be from a source on one side of a conflict, but is actually from the opposing side. It is typically used to vilify, embarrass or misrepresent the enemy. Black propaganda contrasts with grey propaganda, the source of which is not identified, and white propaganda (or White PR) in which the real source is declared and usually more accurate information is given, if also slanted or distorted. Black propaganda purports to emanate from a source other than the true source. This type of propaganda is associated with covert psychological operations (PSYOPs).”
How about the purpose of this book is to make a jew rich? Or how about the purpose of this book is to honor of bunch of jews? Do we have to label everything as a PSYOPs operation today?
G.S.