Joe wrote:I guess I don't really understand, you seem to be very independently minded and very much an intellectual. A gentleman and a scholar
. So even if you didn't know about CI, I can't imagine you, a man who writes as you do, being a true-believer in the convention of the day. I suppose it is curious to me.
Joe, I'll try to explain this a little better--you're right, prior to CI was a very independently minded, but I had no intellectual framework by which to consistently judge whatever knowledge I was accumulating. I knew enough to know that something was terribly wrong, but all that made me was an iconoclast in some ways.
CI grounded me and put everything I knew--or thought I knew--in its proper perspective and context. It essentially made all the information rolling around in my head useful--and purposeful.
As Mark has said many times, "If it ain't Christian Identity, it ain't squat." And I think that applies not just to the study of Christianity and History but also to any intellectual endeavor--it puts everything in its right context.