forum.christogenea.org

Merkel was born, Angela Dorothea Kasner... Polish / German.[ Jew]
This would explain much............


http://mindbodypolitic.com/2015/09/03/a ... -converso/

I saw that article, but honestly I wasn't very convinced that Merkel is part jewish. In reality, Kasner is a legitimate German name, though many ashkenazis adopted it, and by doing so made it sound more jewish than it really is.

As often happened with germanized Poles, Merkel's grandfather Ludwig Kaźmierczak changed his name to Kasner. And Kaźmierczak is also a legitimate ethnic Polish name, not a jewish one. The German and Polish languages have much more in common than people realize, and the changing of names is often rather easy.

And the argument that the name Kaźmierczak is derived from a word that is the name of the jewish ghetto in Krakow is a stretch. The jews in Poland appropriated Polish words and names just as they did in Germany.

The available photograph of Ludwig Kaźmierczak (Kasner) does not show him to be jewish, and the same goes for his wife, at least in my opinion. The border between Germany and Poland was fluid going back over a 1,000 years, and much of that part of Poland is very germanized. There are a lot of Germans who have Polish ancestors and vice versa. The idea that they are completely distinct ethnic groups is a romantic myth. Without knowing that Kaźmierczak was an ethnic Pole, I think he could easily be taken for being German, especially Bavarian.

That said, one need not be a jew to betray our people. The jews would not get anywhere toward their goals of domination if there weren't plenty of our own people who are more than willing to take their blood money and material incentives. I've seen this all too often in White nationalist circles--trying to find the jew in some judas goat's background to explain his--or hers in Merkel's case--betrayal.

EzraLB wrote:I saw that article, but honestly I wasn't very convinced that Merkel is part jewish. In reality, Kasner is a legitimate German name, though many ashkenazis adopted it, and by doing so made it sound more jewish than it really is.

As often happened with germanized Poles, Merkel's grandfather Ludwig Kaźmierczak changed his name to Kasner. And Kaźmierczak is also a legitimate ethnic Polish name, not a jewish one. The German and Polish languages have much more in common than people realize, and the changing of names is often rather easy.

And the argument that the name Kaźmierczak is derived from a word that is the name of the jewish ghetto in Krakow is a stretch. The jews in Poland appropriated Polish words and names just as they did in Germany.

The available photograph of Ludwig Kaźmierczak (Kasner) does not show him to be jewish, and the same goes for his wife, at least in my opinion. The border between Germany and Poland was fluid going back over a 1,000 years, and much of that part of Poland is very germanized. There are a lot of Germans who have Polish ancestors and vice versa. The idea that they are completely distinct ethnic groups is a romantic myth. Without knowing that Kaźmierczak was an ethnic Pole, I think he could easily be taken for being German, especially Bavarian.

That said, one need not be a jew to betray our people. The jews would not get anywhere toward their goals of domination if there weren't plenty of our own people who are more than willing to take their blood money and material incentives. I've seen this all too often in White nationalist circles--trying to find the jew in some judas goat's background to explain his--or hers in Merkel's case--betrayal.

Here is another site that says Merkel is a Jew:

http://www.mmnews.de/index.php/politik/12984-merkel2

It is a Polish site and I had to use a browser translator to read it. It claims Merkel is Jewish via her mother who was a Polish Jew from Galicia and that her grandfather fought against Germany in WWI. The article implies she is Communist.

EzraLB wrote:That said, one need not be a jew to betray our people. The jews would not get anywhere toward their goals of domination if there weren't plenty of our own people who are more than willing to take their blood money and material incentives.

How true this is.
The history of just the last 100 years is so full of this dross that it would be a task to name them all. They fill the Hall of Shame to bursting point ...

Meggie wrote:Here is another site that says Merkel is a Jew:

http://www.mmnews.de/index.php/politik/12984-merkel2

It is a Polish site and I had to use a browser translator to read it. It claims Merkel is Jewish via her mother who was a Polish Jew from Galicia and that her grandfather fought against Germany in WWI. The article implies she is Communist.

I looked at that article, but it was written in German, not Polish--I ran it through translator from three different websites and got three different translations saying slightly different things. But it did bring up words such as "supposed" and "rumored" and "unconfirmed".

While the article seems to allege that Merkel is part jewish through her mother, it offers no documented evidence to support that claim. Galicia is a buzzword often used by people who want to suggest jewishness because so many jews came from that area, though it was predominantly ethnically Polish.

That Merkel's Polish grandfather fought against Germany in WWI is irrelevant. The Poles have a long history of fighting against any invading forces. That certainly doesn't prove he must have been jewish.

The red flag in this article that should make you highly skeptical of its agenda is that it seems to repeat an unconfirmed rumor that Merkel is actually the illegitimate daughter of former German Chancellor, Helmut Kohl. This is the equivalent of those in the "patriot movement" who claimed that Bill Clinton was the illegitimate son of Lawrence Rockefeller.

One of the ironies of this whole controversy surrounding Merkel is that a number of her ancestors come from Poznań (Posen in German), whose patron saint is Paul of Tarsus.

EzraLB wrote:

Meggie wrote:Here is another site that says Merkel is a Jew:

http://www.mmnews.de/index.php/politik/12984-merkel2

It is a Polish site and I had to use a browser translator to read it. It claims Merkel is Jewish via her mother who was a Polish Jew from Galicia and that her grandfather fought against Germany in WWI. The article implies she is Communist.

I looked at that article, but it was written in German, not Polish--I ran it through translator from three different websites and got three different translations saying slightly different things. But it did bring up words such as "supposed" and "rumored" and "unconfirmed".

While the article seems to allege that Merkel is part jewish through her mother, it offers no documented evidence to support that claim. Galicia is a buzzword often used by people who want to suggest jewishness because so many jews came from that area, though it was predominantly ethnically Polish.

That Merkel's Polish grandfather fought against Germany in WWI is irrelevant. The Poles have a long history of fighting against any invading forces. That certainly doesn't prove he must have been jewish.

The red flag in this article that should make you highly skeptical of its agenda is that it seems to repeat an unconfirmed rumor that Merkel is actually the illegitimate daughter of former German Chancellor, Helmut Kohl. This is the equivalent of those in the "patriot movement" who claimed that Bill Clinton was the illegitimate son of Lawrence Rockefeller.

One of the ironies of this whole controversy surrounding Merkel is that a number of her ancestors come from Poznań (Posen in German), whose patron saint is Paul of Tarsus.

I don't know if Merkel is Jewish or not. I only know that she is acting in a way that would be considered Jewish in my way of thinking. Her actions are those of the Jew. She is purposely destroying true Judah. I know the Apostle Paul was a true Judahite, but was a Talmudic demon prior to his conversion. IMHO, regardless of whether Merkel is a Khazar or not, she would qualify as a Talmudic proselyte and two fold more a child of hell than a Khazar. This would, in my opinion make her worse than a demon Jew. BTW, I admit that when I see extreme Talmudic action coming from someone, I suspect a Khazarian lineage. Dont think that will change for me. I have a problem with people blaming everything on the Jew when the Word is clear that we are our own worst enemy and God is using those demons to bring about his promises on us for disobedience. It's us! Not them that's the problem!

If the jew could suddenly become 6,000,000 times more wicked than it already is it wouldn't matter one whip if White people simply obeyed Yahweh.

Staropramen wrote:If the jew could suddenly become 6,000,000 times more wicked than it already is it wouldn't matter one whip if White people simply obeyed Yahweh.

Staro, that's my point exactly, and I couldn't have said it better.

Meggie, i would caution you in using the term "Khazar", especially conceding it to the jews. The Khazars were originally White Israelites, not biological jews. To allow the jews to claim Khazar ancestry is no different from allowing them German ancestry. And even if many Khazars converted to judaism, that does not make them biological jews, any more than Paul of Tarsus became a biological jew by becoming a Pharisee.

Obviously, some White Khazars inter-married with jews, and their demon descendants were all forever jews. However, my guess is that most of the original Khazars were absorbed by the invading Rus and/or absorbed into the mongol/turk invaders. Some White Khazars probably moved west and were absorbed into the slavic nations.

Either way, the jews are not Khazars, regardless of what David Duke claims. They may have some Khazar blood, but then again many jews have Israelite blood inter-mingled with their ever-present blood of Cain.

EzraLB wrote:

Staropramen wrote:If the jew could suddenly become 6,000,000 times more wicked than it already is it wouldn't matter one whip if White people simply obeyed Yahweh.

Staro, that's my point exactly, and I couldn't have said it better.

Meggie, i would caution you in using the term "Khazar", especially conceding it to the jews. The Khazars were originally White Israelites, not biological jews. To allow the jews to claim Khazar ancestry is no different from allowing them German ancestry. And even if many Khazars converted to judaism, that does not make them biological jews, any more than Paul of Tarsus became a biological jew by becoming a Pharisee.

Obviously, some White Khazars inter-married with jews, and their demon descendants were all forever jews. However, my guess is that most of the original Khazars were absorbed by the invading Rus and/or absorbed into the mongol/turk invaders. Some White Khazars probably moved west and were absorbed into the slavic nations. BTW, Duke claims the Jews of today are the Jews of the Bible and not Khazars. BTW, DAvid Duke does not claim the Jews of today are the Khazars. He claims they are the Jews of the Bible.

Either way, the jews are not Khazars, regardless of what David Duke claims. They may have some Khazar blood, but then again many jews have Israelite blood inter-mingled with their ever-present blood of Cain.

Ezra,

I do not normally use that term. However, the Jews themselves claim to be Khazars. No whites I know of do. The term "Jew" is seen as "Judahite" by more "Christians." I understand I am on a CI list and I suppose I took for granted that those here understood what I was saying. The term "Jew"" is misleading and I wanted to distinguish between the demons of today known as "Jews" are not to be confused with the "Judahites." The term "Jew" in the Bible is misleading. So if I say Khazar, understand I mean the devils that call themselves Jews today and not the Judahites of the Bible.

BTW, David Duke does not say the Jews of today are Khazars. He says they are the Jews of the Bible.