This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Discussions about ancient history or the Bible

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Postby wmfinck » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:33 am

The not quite documented claims of a couple of years ago are being admitted in the mainstream.

Won't Calypso Louie be upset that the Egyptian pharaohs were not Mandingo warriors after all.

[It can be discovered that Tut came from a line of pharaohs that had intermarried with the Hittites, so we may consider them to have been Mischlings.]

This was posted August 1st 2015:

http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE7704OR20110801?irpc=932

LONDON (Reuters) - Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.

The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.

"It was very interesting to discover that he belonged to a genetic group in Europe -- there were many possible groups in Egypt that the DNA could have belonged to," said Roman Scholz, director of the iGENEA Centre.

Around 70 percent of Spanish and 60 percent of French men also belong to the genetic group of the Pharaoh who ruled Egypt more than 3,000 years ago.

"We think the common ancestor lived in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago," Scholz told Reuters.

It is estimated that the earliest migration of haplogroup R1b1a2 into Europe began with the spread of agriculture in 7,000 BC, according to iGENEA.

However, the geneticists were not sure how Tutankhamun's paternal lineage came to Egypt from its region of origin.

The centre is now using DNA testing to search for the closest living relatives of "King Tut."

"The offer has only been publicised for three days but we have already seen a lot of interest," Scholz told Reuters.
Image
If a jew is moving his lips, he's lying. If you see a rabbi, there has already been a crime!
User avatar
wmfinck
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Postby EzraLB » Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:32 pm

The article states,

"We think the common ancestor lived in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago," Scholz told Reuters. It is estimated that the earliest migration of haplogroup R1b1a2 into Europe began with the spread of agriculture in 7,000 BC, according to iGENEA. However, the geneticists were not sure how Tutankhamun's paternal lineage came to Egypt from its region of origin."

It's amazing how hard they try to deny that Whites originated in Mesopotamia. Instead they come up with the absurd idea that Whites originated in the Caucasus and migrated to Egypt. Or originated in Africa, moved to the Caucasus, then moved to Egypt. :roll:

How did King Tut and White Europeans have a common ancestor in the Caucasus 9,500 years ago if, according to the article, Whites didn't migrate into that region until 9,000 years ago?

No real surprise here--iGenea, the company that did the DNA analysis of Tut was founded by a Jew:
http://www.igenea.com/en/team

And apparently, iGenea has a pseudo-scientific test to prove if you're a Jew or not--and they claim that they can prove if you're a Jew descended from the ancient Israelites:
http://www.igenea.com/en/jews
"No Rothschild is English. No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians." -- Ezra Pound
User avatar
EzraLB
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:32 am

Re: Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Postby Fenwick » Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:30 pm

EzraLB wrote:It's amazing how hard they try to deny that Whites originated in Mesopotamia. Instead they come up with the absurd idea that Whites originated in the Caucasus and migrated to Egypt. Or originated in Africa, moved to the Caucasus, then moved to Egypt. :roll:

Well in real terms I don't suppose the Caucasus is very far from Mesopotamia anyway. But you're right, it is a mealy way for them to word it.
User avatar
Fenwick
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:21 am

Re: Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Postby MichaelAllen » Thu Aug 13, 2015 6:40 pm

Whoa whoa wait wait hold on here... I bet I can guess what the takeaway point is... we're all niggers, right?
MichaelAllen
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:35 pm


Return to Ancient and Biblical History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests