forum.christogenea.org

I did post an introduction, but it wasn't very good. I will work on a better one, or PM me if you want to know more.

Hello Ethelwulf, and greetings.

I will be right up front with you. Attempted refutations of or arguments over Christian truths will not be permitted here, period. It is a Christian forum FIRST, and Christianity has no concord with liberal democracy and other mainly jewish ideas. On the other hand, objective input concerning history, anthropology, etc. is welcomed so long as it remains objective.

If you have listened to my podcasts, you will find that I support the idea that other races were here before the White Adamic race, and I also believe that if there were "fallen angels" here - and indeed there were if one wants to accept the Biblical term as describing a rebellious race of people, which I do - then it follows for me that they originally had to be White (or they could not have been angels). Yet evolution must be rejected as not only anti-Christian, but to me, anti-common-sense, and this is not the place for arguments concerning that. Predecessors are not necessarily ancestors, regardless of suppositions over DNA, and I will leave it at that.

Hope this helps,
Bill

wmfinck wrote:If you have listened to my podcasts, you will find that I support the idea that other races were here before the White Adamic race, and I also believe that if there were "fallen angels" here - and indeed there were if one wants to accept the Biblical term as describing a rebellious race of people, which I do - then it follows for me that they originally had to be White (or they could not have been angels). Yet evolution must be rejected as not only anti-Christian, but to me, anti-common-sense, and this is not the place for arguments concerning that. Predecessors are not necessarily ancestors, regardless of suppositions over DNA, and I will leave it at that.

Hi thanks for the reply and welcome.

Where can i post a thread or question about the ''sons of God'' and ''daughters of man'' (Gen. 6: 1-4). Does Christogenea have a position on this?

I've not yet listened to any podcasts. I've just recently discovered the christogenea youtube video audio talks (or are those the same things just uploaded)?

What also is the CI/Christogenea view about non-believers in CI but who are white racialists? Do you believe there is salvation for non-believers?

My paper on the events of Genesis Chapter 6:
The Problem With Genesis 6:1-4

Salvation is by race, period. If you have the Spirit of God bestowed upon all White men, you cannot "unsave" yourself. Reward is by how one has treated one's brethren.

The Christogenea videos on Youtube are unofficial. I do not make them, nor can I be responsible for them, except to say that from what I have seen, the guy who is posting them is doing a good job. But I do not even know who he is.

The official podcasts are on my own website, of course. See http://christogenea.org/Radio OR see http://christogenea.org/content/interne ... ives-topic

wmfinck wrote:My paper on the events of Genesis Chapter 6:
The Problem With Genesis 6:1-4

I'll take a look, thanks.

There is a useful chart on the following website, regarding ancient sources -

Early Jewish & Christian Identifications of the ‘Sons of God’http://www.robibrad.demon.co.uk/Chapter5.htm

My own view is that the ''sons of God'' are non-adamites, i presume CI also holds this view.

In a nutshell, my paper demonstrates how the phrase "Sons of God" in Genesis 6 in the AV should say "sons of Heaven" and refers to the "fallen angels" and their offspring. The Enoch literature of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Alexandrian manuscript of the Septuagint, as well as the obvious Scriptural conflict with the terminology in the AV, are used to confirm this.