This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.

But It Can't Be "Hate" When WE Say It

Christian Israel Identity and Other Alternative Media

But It Can't Be "Hate" When WE Say It

Postby mouthypatricia » Thu May 20, 2010 1:20 pm

Paul Fromm is a free speech activist from Canada.

But It Can't Be "Hate" When WE Say It

The Canadian Jewish Congress, going back into the 1930s, has been the loudest voice pushing for legislation to throttle opinions of Canadians through "hate" legislation, aimed at silencing those critical of Jews or Israel or of massive Third World immigration, and, more recently, of the homosexual lobby. So, it's especially delightful that Bernie Farber, executive director of the Canadian Jewish Congress, who has seldom met a censorship measure he didn't like, is now in full howl because Toronto Police have investigated the use of the word "shiksa" as "hate."

"Shiksa" is a nasty Yiddish word for a non-Jewish female. It is strongly pejorative and contemptuous, carrying the notions of pig, slut, an exploitable woman who is not one of us: you can have sex with a shiksa, but you must marry a good Jewish girl. The National Post explains "And Jewish dating sites market themselves with the cheeky slogan 'Shiksas are for practice'" (National Post, May 17, 2010) The Urban Dictionary defines "shiksa" thus: "A Gentile girl or woman, especially one who has attracted a Jewish man. The term derives from the Hebrew word 'sheketz', meaning the flesh of an animal deemed taboo by the Torah. Since a Jewish man marrying a non-Jewish woman is taboo also, this word applies to her. Traditionally this is a derogatory term, though in modern times it has also been used more light-heartedly." Wikipedia adds that "shiksa" means "abomination", "impure," or "object of loathing, depending on the translator."

So, in other words, bad meat, loathsome, abominable -- not fit for a Jewish male to marry, but fine for sexual exploitation. Interestingly, while Jews are enjoined to marry their own -- and rightly and healthily so -- politically correct propaganda would have all the rest of us see no problem in miscegenation or mixed race coupling or marriages.

"A 'non-Jewish Shiksa' is now considered as a victim category in Toronto Police Service's latest hate crime study The Canadian Jewish Congress says the Toronto Police Service is pushing anti-hate law 'to its most absurd level' by listing 'non-Jewish Shiksa' as a victim category in its latest hate crime study. The statistical report reveals that officers investigated hate crimes in Toronto last year against such unusual victim groups as teachers, feminists, infidels, police, Nazis and pedophiles.
But it is the redundantly named category of 'non-Jewish Shiksa' -- a slur for a non-Jewish woman, from a Hebrew root meaning 'a detested thing' -- that has especially baffled the CJC, a prominent advocate for stronger hate crime laws. 'You just can't apply it to literally everything,'said CEO Bernie Farber.
The report, not yet released on the TPS website, shows an increase in 'hate/bias occurrences' over the year before, from 153 to 174, with 23 charges laid." (National Post, May 17, 2010)
So, if one calls a Negro a "nigger" or a Jew a "kike", that's a hate incident, but, according to Bernie Farber, calling a non-Jewish woman involved with a Jewish man a piece of tainted meat - "shiksa" -- is fine. This "anti-hate" world of censorship is so much fun.
Metro Toronto's Police certainly do not have much of a handle on the drug pushing violent Jamaican gangs who've been shooting up a storm these past few years. It's a waste of taxpayers' money bleeding off personnel to worry about names people call each other. So, in a whole year, there were 174 "hate/bias" occurrences and, get this, "by far the most common crime was mischief, usually graffiti." So, some kid writes "nigger" or "faggot" on a toilet stall and some busybody reports it. Now, we have another "hate/bias" occurrence to keep the "hate squad" in their easy jobs with plenty of Tim Horton's donuts and coffee.
mouthypatricia
 

Re: But It Can't Be "Hate" When WE Say It

Postby matthewott » Thu May 20, 2010 6:50 pm

Hmmmm....this certainly could not have been printed in the Toronto Tribune (sorry, just pulled a generic name out of the hat).

But OF COURSE that's overreaching! How dare they! Don't these silly govt. agents know that the Jews are the Chosen Ones and therefor not even subject to their own laws? What's wrong with a shiksa? Everyone should have one or ten. How about a few pretty blond haired blue eyed 8 year old little boys for sport? We need to top it all off with a thorough cleaning of a newborn's penis! What wrong with that? There is nothing sick, demented, twisted, or hateful about ANY of that!
For the Word of Yahweh is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Heb. 4:12
User avatar
matthewott
 
Posts: 788
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: Millersburg PA

Re: But It Can't Be "Hate" When WE Say It

Postby JamesTheJust » Thu May 20, 2010 11:02 pm

I must agree with the dogs on this. Any White woman who would touch a filthy, loathsome kike is a shiksa.
Ye chosen seed of Israel's race, ye ransomed from the fall, hail him who saves you by his grace, and crown him Lord of all. Hail him who saves you by his grace, and crown him Lord of all.
JamesTheJust
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:44 am
Location: Arizona


Return to Alternative Media

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron