Are the original fallen angels dead?

[wmfinck]

The LXX/MT chronology differences in a nutshell:
http://emahiser.christogenea.org/patriarchal-chronology

[Staropramen]

Oh, OK, I see what you're saying.
The first I heard it was from Bill, and I'll see if I can recall where that was.
Coming to CI from (mainly) KJV-using churches, I'd just never heard of this discrepancy before.

I spent what, 14 years in jew-lovin' churches and I don't think I ever heard the Septuagint referred to. I know it's mentioned in my Halley's bible handbook but I don't recall being motivated to research it deeper from what was in there. I'll have to check that out again.

[Gaius]

The LXX/MT chronology differences in a nutshell:
http://emahiser.christogenea.org/patriarchal-chronology

That's great, Bill.
Thanks.

Staro -- same for me.
It was only about six years ago I first heard of the LXX, and that was not from any "pastor", but my own online private enquiries into the Bible. I seem to remember that one of the first things I read about the LXX was that it didn't exist, was a fake etc ....
There is surely some organised deception out there ...

PS. This is to not even mention the nutcases; I was just now re-listening to some Pragmatic Genesis, including Bill's account of the sad eejit saying that Noah was a spaceman bringing vials with the seeds of all creatures to Earth in his spaceship .... This could be funny, but it's not really ....