This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.
9 But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.
aleajactaest wrote:See attachment first.
Which of the 2 biblical floods is the right one?
Ummmm, I am missing something, or this chart is not very comprehensive.
staropramen said
"Earth" is the Hebrew word "eratz" which means "the ground" and in common usage means "that land". The dove made three trips. We can see clearly in verse 12 that the ultimate destination of the dove was to part company with Noah for good. If this is so, and it is, why did the dove return to Noah the second time as recorded in verse 11? Why didn't the dove, upon discovering a place to rest the second time just stay there? Obviously the dove had an understanding that it had a job to do. How did the dove know this? There are only two possible explanations. Either Yahweh gave the dove supernatural understanding of the details of the mission or Noah had previously trained the dove. Can you say "homing pigeon"? In either scenario it would certainly be possible for the dove to understand that it's mission involved finding a dry place within the borders of the land in question and not just any old place to rest. Only a goofy judeochristian asshat would surmise a worldwide flood from Genesis 8:9. These buffoons will cite all sorts of data about different bird's ability to fly around the world and that's all fine and good but it has no relevance to this passage! These judeo-bozos have no faith in scripture and will gleefully twist it's meaning to preserve their homo-nigger loving jew-antiracist worldview!
aleajactaest wrote:Except for your details of the dove whereabouts, I am with you with the rest of your reply.
Question - Is it the raven or the dove?But ... about the raven ... the 40 days ... the 150 days?
According to some writers, there are only 3 places that a local flood could have happened:I cannot believe that the flood was universal; too many indications that it wasn't.
I admit that flood #1 is not that precise but flood #2 sufficiently is.Ummmm, I am missing something, or this chart is not very comprehensive.
Return to Old Testament Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests