It is interesting how Daniel Johns immediately goes to attacking William Finck and James Wickstrom. Finck and Wickstrom had nothing to do with the posting of this thread. I posted this thread. I did not consult with Finck and Wickstrom and ask them if I should post it. I could instantly see Dan for what he is, which of course got me some flack. I call it like I see it, and because of people like Daniel Johns, we who believe in truth are made to look silly.
I was not surprised by Dan's comments. I knew he would go to attacking the character of people who had nothing to do with exposing him. I knew he would preach a gospel of racially blended solidarity. Dan is beyond repentance, because the spirit he follows is not the spirit of our Father.
Daniel never answered my email asking him to explain the pictures. Here is the email:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Subject: Regarding Your Facebook Photos and Halloween Party
Pastor Daniel Johns,
I recently was made aware of some photos on your facebook profile in which you were celebrating at a Halloween party in costume.
It is apparent from the photos that you were in the company of non-whites and people of perhaps South American or Mexican heritage. I even viewed a partly negro woman in one dance scene in which you are present.
Being that you have represented yourself as a Christian Identity pastor and teacher of dual-seedline theology, and a white separatist, I would like you to explain your attendance at that party which by the photo notes occurred in 2010.
I have pointed out your photos to others who share my feelings of surprise, shock, and dismay for they veritably portray you association and behavior that is clearly in conflict with the scriptural requirements of Christ's shepherds, and seriously out of line for anyone claiming to champion the cause of the white man in this age of sodomite race-mixing. I am left with no other conclusion to make other than you disregard Yahweh's law to be separate from the strangers who hate Him, and were setting an abominable example for one claiming leadership of a flock.
Perhaps there is some explanation. If you could explain to me how my perceptions are mistaken?
Thank you for your time in this matter,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It is my conclusion that Dan will not separate himself because he is already among his own people. He has declared them to be his people out of his own mouth. He has called them good, righteous people. He wants them on his side in a "shooting war" that he insists is coming. He has not studied history to see that we have the ability to seize state power without a shooting war, IF WE REPENT AND CALL ON YAHWEH. I agree that at this time there is no political solution. But I disagree with the idea that through repentance, we could not eventually exercise full political dominion over our own land. The Greeks have shown they can get much of the police and military on the side of a nationalist party that the establishment hates. They did this without violence. Nehemiah raised a tumult among the people to stop the mortgages and impoverishment by the ruling class. He did it without violence. If we repent, it may not be long before many police and low-level officials see our example and repent, too. I saw the truth and desired the straight and narrow way. To presume others won't do the same in time is short-sighted. We are to be a light to men, not a muzzle flash. Dan is not teaching repentance, so in his mind the way to power is only through insurrection, or the flesh. Do not buy into such violent rhetoric. It is premature pandering to the wannabe hero complex. If violence ever becomes necessary, it will not be a topic of ideological discussion. It would just be necessary for self-defense. Most of our people still CONSENT to this system, so you can't overthrow by violence what 95 percent of your brethren want. They'll just put you down.
Then, as I pointed out earlier, Dan vomited out his ideology of impending doom and violence in which we will need the help of niggers, spics, and other animals while in our "foxhole" supposedly shooting it out with the so-called enemy. This is not scriptural. The fall of Babylon is not going to happen in the false manner Dan seems to promote. Babylon is going to fall in a day. Events, rather than a pre-emptive army, are going to lead to the cleansing of our land. Dan believes these mamzers are his fellow troops. That is Talmudic. The troops he has allied himself with are the flood from the Dragon's mouth in Revelation. This is what is in Dan's heart. Out of the mouth proceed the things of the heart.
We are not the ones promoting unnecessary violence. People like Dan Johns and Eli James promote violence against the innocent, then turn around and call us "exterminationists." Meanwhile, the Jews, Spics, Nigs, Arabs, Chinks, are in fact exterminating us slowly through crime, social policy, miscegenation, and forcing us into a low birth rate situation. Dan has admitted he sides with them. He has admitted he wants them in his "foxhole." Yet he has no idea what Yahweh is sending down the pike to shake things up. Those "good, righteous people" that Dan loves and wants in his foxhole, will eat him when they get hungry.
These strangers are eating my Posterity's substance, and Dan wants them in his foxhole. He wants them to engage in violence against people like me, who believe in being separate.