This Forum is now inactive and has been replaced by a new Christogenea Forum. You may browse here but there are no updated threads or new posts since January 1st 2017. Forum members please see THIS NOTICE for information concerning your account at the new forum.

Will the Literati awaken to the Illuminati? Probably Not.

Discussions about the mainstream media

Will the Literati awaken to the Illuminati? Probably Not.

Postby wmfinck » Wed Nov 05, 2014 3:20 pm

So a professor writes a book about elections and admits that they are practically meaningless in relation to actual gevernment policy. Of course, any sensible observer can figure that one out.

But there are people who are already seeing this article as some sort of panacea, thinking that the media is awakening to the International Jewish Conspiracy and the real powers in the shadows, which are indeed the dragon that animates the beast.

However that is not the case. In reality, the professor (Michael Glennon) is apparently asserting only that the perceived continuity in government policy from one administration to another can be attributed to "bureaucracy", and that even if they screw up, the "bureaucracy" itself is actually made up of decent people with the interests of the nation involved.

Wow, this man would be a clown, if he were not an insider! In truth, he himself has been a part of that bureaucracy, another tool in the hand of the unseen "masters of the universe" [sic]. Whose water do the bureaucrats carry? Why do the investments bankers always win?

The Boston Globe, the main outlet of just another Jewish-controlled major media company, is not going to be a harbinger for the Revelation of Truth to te masses. Like all major media, it is also a part of the problem. Christ and His Revelation are our only true harbinger.

So this is simply another great Rabbit Hole designed to trap the unwary into thinking a there is a human solution to our woes:

Vote all you want. The secret government won’t change.
The people we elect aren’t the ones calling the shots, says Tufts University’s Michael Glennon

The voters who put Barack Obama in office expected some big changes. From the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping to Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act, candidate Obama was a defender of civil liberties and privacy, promising a dramatically different approach from his predecessor.

But six years into his administration, the Obama version of national security looks almost indistinguishable from the one he inherited. Guantanamo Bay remains open. The NSA has, if anything, become more aggressive in monitoring Americans. Drone strikes have escalated. Most recently it was reported that the same president who won a Nobel Prize in part for promoting nuclear disarmament is spending up to $1 trillion modernizing and revitalizing America’s nuclear weapons.

Why did the face in the Oval Office change but the policies remain the same? Critics tend to focus on Obama himself, a leader who perhaps has shifted with politics to take a harder line. But Tufts University political scientist Michael J. Glennon has a more pessimistic answer: Obama couldn’t have changed policies much even if he tried.

Though it’s a bedrock American principle that citizens can steer their own government by electing new officials, Glennon suggests that in practice, much of our government no longer works that way. In a new book, “National Security and Double Government,” he catalogs the ways that the defense and national security apparatus is effectively self-governing, with virtually no accountability, transparency, or checks and balances of any kind. He uses the term “double government”: There’s the one we elect, and then there’s the one behind it, steering huge swaths of policy almost unchecked. Elected officials end up serving as mere cover for the real decisions made by the bureaucracy.

Read the rest at the Globe website:
If a jew is moving his lips, he's lying. If you see a rabbi, there has already been a crime!
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2775
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:09 am

Return to Media

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests