Propitiation is NOT Atonement!

[wmfinck]

This debate has come up around me several times this week, and I thought I'd share a few notes on the topic.

All definitions below are from either The American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd edition, or Liddell & Scott's Greek-English Lexicon, or The New College Latin & English Dictionary, depending on the language of the word being defined. They are abridged, and some of my own comments are added.

Propitiate: to conciliate, appease.

Propitiation: The act of propitiating. Latin propitius, a disposition of favor (one can think pro-pity, a setting forth of pity or mercy). The Greek word translated propitiation in the New Testament is hilasmos, which is a means of appeasing, a conciliation.

To appease: to bring peace or calm, to satisfy or relieve.

To atone: to make amends or reparations for an injury or wrongdoing, to expiate.

The only time we see the word "atonement" in the popular versions of the New Testament is at Romans 5:11, but the Greek word is katallasso, and it means reconciliation. It does not ever mean atonement, and it cannot mean atonement. Therefore, the word atonement does not appear in the New Testament, unless one is an advocate of "Church Greek", which is not the Greek of our Redeemer and His apostles who spoke and wrote Koine Greek..

Therefore the word atonement is not found in the New Testament. Christians confuse propitiation and atonement, however these are not the same, although the "Church Greek" devisors would like Christians to confuse them. The devisors of "Church Greek" want to confuse these terms, because they strive to eliminate the idea of Christ's propitiation as an act of conciliation between Israel and Yahweh our God, endeavouring to destroy the racial covenants between Israel and Yahweh. The matter of reconciliation stands in the way of the universalism of the "Church".

Christ is not our Atonement, He is our Propitiation, and there is a world of difference. We can never fully make our atonement, because we cannot ever repay Yahweh for our sins, national or personal. Yet under the New Covenant our reconciliation with Yahweh is effected upon our acceptance of the propitiation of Christ, but it was not done on the cross: He can be a propitiation for us, but He cannot make amends for us: our conciliation is achieved by our acceptance of His propitiation, if indeed He accepts us!

We all have some judaeo baggage to lose if we are ever going to come to a better knowledge of the truth.

Praise Yahweh!
William Finck
Christogenea.org

[Unnamed]

Yeah, this was an eye-opener for me last night for several reasons... the least of which is that apparently I still have a lot of unlearning to do. I can't believe I never put it together before now, but I had been taught in church all of my life that Christ's sacrifice was to atone for our sins. How could that be, when the crucifixion wasn't even on the Day of Atonement??? And if Yahweh's law demands we take responsibility for our sins through punishment, how could another die in our place? Yet that's what's taught...

Yashua's blood is the blood of the Passover Lamb, spread so that Yahweh's wrath won't visit us, and all we have to do is have faith like our forefathers did to take shelter under the blood.

In any case, good point, and apparently one that should be pushed more.

[wmfinck]

Your realization concerning the blood is excellent, and wholly correct!

It may be taken a step further: you must be OF the blood of the Lamb to receive that shelter!

[JamesTheJust]

Interesting Bill. Thanks. I had always used the two words interchangeably, but now I can see that there is a difference. Amazing how the universalists, always led by the enchanter race, has changed the meanings of word in both obvious and not so obvious ways.